Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00173719

Influence of Assistive Device Use While Performing Dual Task in Patients With Stroke

The primary purposes of the this three-year research proposal are to investigate the influence of assistive device use on dynamic balance and the associated attentional demands during standing and walking in patients with stroke

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

50 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

School and Graduate Institute of Physical Therapy College of Medicine, National Taiwan University

Taipei, 100, Taiwan

About this study

Research has shown the effectiveness of using ambulatory assistive devices to increase standing stability of patients with stroke in clinical practice (Maeda et al., 2001). However, literature has also suggested that manipulation of ambulatory assistive devices in dynamic motor tasks, such as walking, inevitably requires additional attention, even in healthy adults (Wright & Kemp, 1992). Given that the majority of patients with stroke suffer from balance control difficulty, which subsequently increases their attentional demands associated with maintaining balance (Brown et al., 2002), it remains an important question as to whether the use of ambulatory assistive devices would take away some attentional resources that would otherwise be used for maintaining balance.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Healthy adults

  • between 50 and 75 years old
  • having no neuromuscular or musculoskeletal disorders that would jeopardize their balance control abilities
  • being willing to sign an informed consent approved by the Human Subjects Committee of the National Taiwan University Hospital

Stroke patients

  • between 50 and 75 years old
  • hemiplegic or hemiparetic as a result of a single cerebral vascular accident
  • medically stable with no ongoing complications
  • independently walking without using any assistive device for at least 10 meters, and have the exercise endurance for at least 30 minutes
  • having no serious hemianopsia, hemi-inattention or any obvious cognitive problems as evaluated with the Mini-Mental State examination
  • being willing to sign an informed consent approved by the Human Subjects Committee of the National Taiwan University Hospital

Exclusion criteria

  • unable to follow the order of the experimenters, and having serious comprehension and expression impairment

Treatment and study plan

Standard cane

Device

Primary outcomes

  1. To investigate the voice reaction time and response accuracy while simultaneously performing the dual task with or without using assistive devices for healthy adults and stroke patients

    Time frame: 2003-2004

Secondary outcomes

  1. To investigate the related gait parameters(ex. walking speed, stride length, gait cycle time, and foot pressure etc.)while simultaneously performing the dual task with or without using assistive devices for healthy adults and stroke patients

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

National Taiwan University Hospital

Other

Collaborators

  • National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan

Registry information

Official study title

Influence of Assistive Device Use on Dynamic Balance and the Associated Attentional Demands During Standing and Walking in Patients With Stroke

Important dates

Study start
2003
Primary completion
2004
Study completion
2004
First posted
Sep 15, 2005
Registry last updated
Aug 28, 2013

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.