Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03261661

Improving Response to Intervention in Students With or at Risk of Reading Disabilities

The purpose of the proposed studies is to examine a reading intervention for fourth grade students with reading difficulties that integrate work in mindset (beliefs about whether abilities are innate or can be developed) with the academic component of reading. Specifically, the investigators will examine the extent to which integrating mindset intervention improves student response to reading intervention. The investigators will use previous research in intensive reading intervention for students with reading difficulties in the upper elementary grades to examine an intervention that addresses reading skill deficits, while also providing mindset training along with (Study 1) or embedded in (Study 2) the reading intervention. It is hypothesized that students in the reading intervention with mindset conditions will improve their reading outcomes more than students in the reading intervention only and business as usual groups.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Age range

9 year–11 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

The purpose of the proposed studies is to examine a reading intervention for fourth grade students with RD that integrates the psychosocial component of mindset with the academic component of reading. Specifically, the investigators will examine the extent to which integrating mindset intervention improves student response to reading intervention. The investigators will use previous research in intensive reading intervention for students with RD in the upper elementary grades to examine an intervention that addresses reading skill deficits, while providing mindset training along with (Study 1) or embedded in (Study 2) the reading intervention.

Specific Aim 1. To determine the effects of intensive reading intervention with mindset training (Reading Intervention Plus Mindset) relative to reading intervention alone and business as usual comparison on the academic outcomes of fourth grade students with or at-risk for reading disabilities. The proposed study will target students with or at-risk for reading disabilities in fourth grade to examine the effects of reading intervention with mindset training relative to reading intervention alone and business as usual comparison on students' mindset, general academic achievement, phonological awareness, word reading, fluency, and reading comprehension outcomes. Students will be randomly assigned to condition with students in the Reading Intervention Plus Mindset condition receiving the mindset training along with their reading intervention. Students assigned to the Reading Intervention will receive the same reading intervention but without the mindset training. Students in the Business as Usual condition will continue to receive their typical school services which will be carefully documented. It is hypothesized that students in the Reading Intervention Plus Mindset condition will improve their reading outcomes more than students in the Reading Intervention only and Business as Usual groups by continuing to develop a growth mindset to work through the challenges in their reading development and, thus, being able to progress more efficiently in the reading intervention.

Specific Aim 2. To determine the effects of embedding mindset training in an intensive reading intervention on the mindset and academic outcomes of fourth grade students with or at-risk for reading disabilities. The proposed study will use the results from Specific Aim 1 to further examine the effects of an intensive reading intervention with mindset embedded in the content with a new cohort of fourth grade students with or at-risk for reading disabilities. Embedding mindset practices directly in the content area of difficulty for students with learning difficulties could be more powerful than separate mindset training. Students will be randomly assigned to one of two conditions (Embedded or Business as Usual). The investigators will examine the effects of intervention on students' mindset, word reading, fluency, and reading comprehension measures. It is hypothesized that embedding mindset training directly in the reading content will further improve student reading outcomes by allowing students to directly apply a growth mindset to their work in the area of difficulty, reading.

Specific Aim 3. To link student characteristics to response to intervention. The proposed study will link students' initial reading achievement, initial mindset, vocabulary ability, behavior/attention as well as race, sex, socioeconomic status, and parents' educational background to student response to intervention. It is hypothesized that students with lower initial reading achievement, higher initial levels of fixed mindset, higher vocabulary, lower parent educational background or socioeconomic status, and/or higher levels of problem behavior/attention initially will benefit more from the mindset intervention, particularly the embedded mindset intervention. It is hypothesized that no differences based on gender or race.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Fourth grader Identified with reading difficulty

-

Exclusion criteria

Identified vision, hearing, or intellectual disability

-

Treatment and study plan

Reading

Behavioral

Students are taught the processes involved in hearing, seeing, and feeling sounds as well as differences between sounds in words. New knowledge is built on previous knowledge in a step-by-step manner. Sounds build to letter-sound relationships to reading of words and syllables. Students learn the connection between reading of words (decoding) and writing/spelling words (encoding) building from simple words to multisyllabic words to text reading with fluency and understanding.

MINDSET

Behavioral

Blended learning program with online and teacher-directed activities related to how the brain functions, learns, and remembers, and how it changes in a physical way when we exercise it. Instruction in how students are in control of their brain and its development, and how to apply this to their schoolwork with practical strategies for tackling academic challenges.

Reading Embedded with Mindset

Behavioral

Mindset training explicitly linked to the reading content through lesson openers, feedback prompts, and self-monitoring of mindset during reading work.

Business as usual

Behavioral

Reading interventions already provided to students with reading difficulties as per typical procedures at the participating school

Other names: Typical Instruction

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Cloze Reading Comprehension

    Time frame: baseline, within 3 weeks of intervention completion

    Students are instructed to read a short passage and identify a missing key word that would make sense

  2. Change in Passage Reading Comprehension Study 1 only

    Time frame: baseline, within 3 weeks of intervention completion

    The comprehension assessment consists of expository and narrative passages that increase in length, followed by multiple choice questions.

  3. Change in Word Reading

    Time frame: baseline, within 3 weeks of intervention completion

    Students reads a list of real words

  4. Change in Decoding

    Time frame: baseline, within 3 weeks of intervention completion

    Student reads a list of nonsense words

  5. Change in Reading Fluency

    Time frame: baseline, within 3 weeks of intervention completion

    Students read three passages aloud for 1 min. The total number of correct words is counted.

  6. Change in Phonological Processing Blending Study 1 only

    Time frame: baseline, within 3 weeks of intervention completion

    Blending requires the students to listen to a series of real words spoken in segments and earn a point for each word they blend correctly.

  7. Change in Phonological Processing Deletion Study 1 only

    Time frame: baseline, within 3 weeks of intervention completion

    Elision requires a student to listen to a segmented word and then pronounce the word without a segment.

  8. Change in Word Reading Fluency

    Time frame: baseline, within 3 weeks of intervention completion

    Students reads a list of real words. The number of words read in 45 seconds is counted

  9. Change in Decoding Fluency

    Time frame: baseline, within 3 weeks of intervention completion

    Student reads a list of nonsense words. The number of words read in 45 seconds is counted

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mindset

    Time frame: baseline, within 3 weeks of intervention completion

    Ratings of how student thinks about learning and the brain

  2. Change in Math Problem Solving Study 1 only

    Time frame: baseline, within 3 weeks of intervention completion

    Students analyze and solve math problems

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Vanderbilt University

Other

Collaborators

  • Florida State University
  • Southern Methodist University

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Aug 25, 2017
Registry last updated
Aug 4, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.