University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55414, United States
NCT Number: NCT02004977
The goals of this intervention study are to implement best practice strategies to expand and promote the school breakfast program and test the impact upon student participation rates among a) all 10th and 11th grade students and among a randomly selected cohort of 800 students b) total diet and body mass index and percent body fat inin 16 rural Minnesota school districts.
School-wide Primary Aim: Improve participation in the school breakfast program among high school students. Hypothesis: School-wide school breakfast program participation will be higher in the intervention versus comparison group.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeAll sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55414, United States
We will accomplish the following secondary aims using a random subsample of 800 incoming 10th and11th grade students.
Student-level Secondary Aims Secondary Aim 1: High school students in the intervention condition will decrease their rate of weight gain relative to height gain as measured by change in body mass index and percent body fat compared to students in the control condition. Hypothesis: Body mass index and percent body fat will be maintained or reduced in the treatment versus control group.
Secondary Aim 2: High school students in the intervention condition will maintain or decrease their energy intake while improving dietary intakes of low fat dairy, whole grains and fresh fruits compared to the control students.
Hypothesis: Energy intake (measured by 3, 24-hour recalls) will be maintained or reduced and intakes of low fat dairy, whole grains and fresh fruits will increase more in the intervention groups.
Secondary Aim 3: Compared to students in the control condition, high school students in the intervention condition will report receiving more support to eat school breakfast. Support will be social (increased peer and school support) or related to the school environment (satisfaction with serving locations and times, eating locations, foods and increased availability of low fat dairy, fruits and whole grains for breakfast).
Hypothesis: The treatment group will report receiving more social and school environment support for eating school breakfast than the comparison group (measured by a student survey).
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Must be in 10th or 11th grade in school year 2013-14 Must have access to the internet Must have access to a phone
Exclusion criteria
for the Cohort:
Unable to read English Unable to speak English Pregnant Plan to move out of the school district within school year Not in school most mornings Eat breakfast 4 or more days a week
Access to the school breakfast program is defined as implementation of a grab-n-go cart outside of the school cafeteria, policy change allowing students to eat in the hallway and marketing of the program. in rural high schools.
Other names: improve access to school breakfast
Time frame: Change from baseline (SY1) in average school year school-level breakfast participation at the end of one school year (SY2).
Change in participation in the reimbursable school breakfast program will be evaluated from school provided objective participation data from baseline (SY1) to the end of one school year (SY2)
Time frame: Change from baseline (SY1) in student body mass index at the end of one school year (SY2).
Change from baseline to the end of one school year (SY2) in body mass index.
Time frame: Change from baseline in student body fat at the end of the school year (SY2)
Student percent body fat will be measured by trained research staff
Time frame: Change from baseline in Healthy Eating Index at the end of the school year (SY2).
Change in the total Healthy Eating Index score from baseline to SY2. The Healthy Eating Index (HEI) score is a measure of diet quality. HEI scores can range from 0 to 100, with 0 representing the least overall healthy diet, and 100 representing the most overall healthy diet
Time frame: Change in perceived support from baseline at the end of the school year (SY2)
Change in social support from baseline to SY2. Assessment of social support for breakfast was measured by asking the students to consider a typical month and record how often the following people encouraged them to eat or continue to eat breakfast at school: (1) parent/guardian, (2) friend, (3) other kids at my school, (4) teacher, and (5) other school staff. A 4-point Likert-type scale (disagree to agree, 0-4) for each of the categories was used. The total scale summed the five categories. The scale ranged from 0-20, a higher score indicates more social support.
University of Minnesota
Other
Acronym: breakFAST!
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05742165
Behavior, Body Weight
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05882045
Body Weight, Cardiovascular Diseases
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05929079
Apnea, Body Weight
Anniston, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00342732
Body Weight, Nutrition Disorders
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details