Simulation-based training
OtherAs described under group descriptions
NCT Number: NCT03105544
Detection of growth restricted fetuses relies primarily on abdominal ultrasound examinations during pregnancy. Many clinicians, however, have not received systematic training and may therefore perform inadequately. We wish to examine, whether systematic, simulation-based training can improve diagnostic accuracy of estimated fetal weight by ultrasound at different levels of clinical experience.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeAll sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
Participants are physicians working at obstetric departments. Participant characteristics (age, experience in years and number of monthly scans) are recorded. Participants perform two abdominal growth scans prior to randomization and estimated fetal weight is compared to birth weight. Mean absolute percentage error is calculated as a measure of diagnostic accuracy.
Participants are then randomized to either control (no intervention) or intervention. The latter group receives training on the Metaphor Scantrainer trans abdominal ultrasound simulator until they pass a previously validated test. After completing the training the participants use a mannikin to practice systematic approach and 'knobology'.
All participants then perform another two growth scans. Diagnostic accuracy before and after the intervention or control period is compared.
We wish to examine the effect of systematic training on the diagnostic accuracy of estimated fetal weight by ultrasound across different levels of clinical experience.
If an effect can be found in the inexperienced participants, simulation-based training in obstetric ultrasound could be implemented as a part of basic obstetric training and/or as a means of maintaining skills.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
As described under group descriptions
Time frame: 1 month
percentage error of fell weight estimate compared to actual fetal weight
Time frame: 1 month
Images are rated using the image-scoring method by Salomon et al. (Salomon et al. Feasibility and reproducibility of an image-scoring method for quality control of fetal biometry in the second trimester. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;27;34-40) The images are scores on the number of landmarks, correct caliper placement and image optimization. A minimum of 0 and a maximum of 16 points can be given (best possible score).
Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05774236
Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Barcelona, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT05576207
Anemia of Pregnancy, Birth Weight
Rangpur City, Bangladesh
View Trial DetailsNCT07193381
Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Izmir, Bayrakli, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06039319
Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Knoxville, Tennessee, United States
View Trial Details