Service diététique Hôpital Marin d'Hendaye- AP-HP
Hendaye, 64701, France
NCT Number: NCT05249998
Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) is a rare and complex genetic disease characterized by hypothalamic-pituitary axis dysfunction combining eating disorders associated with hyperphagia and satiety deficiency, mild intellectual deficit and behavioral disorders. This disease requires continuous management through specific therapeutic education to prevent metabolic and cardiorespiratory complications related to obesity. Physical activity must therefore be regular, adapted to the disability, taking into account cognitive deficits and behavioral disorders.
The Unit of Care and Rehabilitation, of the Hôpital Marin d'Hendaye, receives patients with PWS or other obesity from rare causes, at a rate of 1 to 2 annual stays of 1 to 2 months, which allow the regulation of somatic disorders and the initiation of weight loss. However, the difficulty is to keep a stable weight curve between stays. Only 20% of patients over the last 2 years managed to stabilize or decrease their BMI during the 6 months following their hospitalization.
The proposed study aims to evaluate an innovative and individualized care program combining Physical activity, Nutrition and therapeutic education for adults with PWS who will be admitted to the hospital for 5 weeks.
We hypothesize that this program will allow to stabilize or decrease the BMI of patients at 6 months after hospitalization by inducing a behavioral change in terms of physical activity and eating behavior.
We will conduct a randomized controlled trial on 128 patients who will participate in this program, or will benefit from standard care.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–60 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Hendaye, 64701, France
Main objective :
Evaluate the effectiveness at 6 months of an intensified and individualised care programme combining theoretical and practical therapeutic education workshops on adapted physical activity, nutrition and eating behaviour (i.e. intervention) during hospitalisation, compared to usual care (i.e. control).
The assessment will be done by comparing the proportion of patients stabilizing or decreasing their BMI at 6 months after the end of the stay (M7) in the 2 groups (intervention/control).
Secondary objectives:
During hospitalization:
To evaluate, compared to the usual care, the impact of the intervention on :
At 3 and 6 months after hospitalization :
Evaluate the impact of the intervention on :
At 6 months after hospitalization:
Evaluate, in comparison with the usual management, the impact of the intervention on the evolution of metabolic criteria and metabolic and cardio-respiratory risk factors during a consultation at the hospital in their reference center.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Patients will benefit from the activities already proposed as part of the usual practice and in addition a multidisciplinary staff will take place in order to interpret the assessments of the patients included and to direct the patients according to their phenotypic profile towards the different programmes of adapted physical activity.
Time frame: week 4
Time frame: week 7
Time frame: week 4
Time frame: baseline and week 4
Time frame: baseline and week 4
Time frame: baseline and week 4
Weight in kilograms, Height in meters to calculate Body Mass Index (BMI) in kg/m^2
Time frame: baseline and week 4
CRP measured before and after Adapted Physical Activity Program : difference between these two dosages
Time frame: baseline and week 4
Glycated hemoglobin (Hba1C) measured before and after Adapted Physical Activity Program : difference between these two dosages
Time frame: baseline and week 4
fasting blood glucose level measured before and after Adapted Physical Activity Program : difference between these two dosages
Time frame: baseline and week 4
Cholesterol measured before and after Adapted Physical Activity Program : difference between these two dosages
Time frame: baseline and week 4
Glycemy measured before and after Adapted Physical Activity Program : difference between these two dosages
Time frame: baseline and week 4
Transaminases measured before and after Adapted Physical Activity Program : difference between these two dosages
Time frame: baseline and week 4
Gamma GT measured before and after Adapted Physical Activity Program : difference between these two dosages
Time frame: baseline and week 4
Alkaline phosphatase measured before and after Adapted Physical Activity Program : difference between these two dosages
Time frame: baseline and week 4
Urea measured before and after Adapted Physical Activity Program : difference between these two dosages
Time frame: baseline and week 4
creatinine measured before and after Adapted Physical Activity Program : difference between these two dosages
Time frame: baseline and week 4
albumin measured before and after Adapted Physical Activity Program : difference between these two dosages
Time frame: baseline and week 4
This score is devided in 3 under-scores which are:
Time frame: baseline and week 4
This score is devided in 2 scores which are :
"adhesion" on a scale of 0 to 2 "motivation" on a scale of 0 to 2
The final score is the addition of them on a scale of 0 to 4. The minimum and worst score is 0. The maximum and best score is 4.
Time frame: baseline, Month 4, Month 7
This score is on a scale of 0 to 45, 0 is the minimum and worst score and 45 the maximum and worst score of physical activity.
Score under 18 means "inactive" Score between 18 and 35 means "active" Score superior to 35 means "very active"
Time frame: baseline, Month 4, Month 7
This score is devided in 3 under-scores which are :
Time frame: baseline, Month 4, Month 7
Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) is a method for writting personalized evaluation scales in order to quantify progress towards defined goals.
The GAS methodology consists of:
A five point scale is used :
" -2 " is the baseline ; " -1 " represents progression to the goal without goal attainment ; " 0 " is the expected level after intervention ; " +1 " is represent a better outcome than expected ; " +2 " is the best possible outcometha t could have been expected to the goal
Scores between " 0 " and " +2 " indicate that the patient has achieved the objective
Time frame: Month 2, Month 3, Month 4, Month 5, Month 6, Month 7
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Other
Acronym: APHYNET
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05657860
Aberrant Motor Behavior in Dementia, Abnormalities, Multiple
Brooklyn, New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05541003
Abnormalities, Multiple, Body Weight
New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01818921
Abnormalities, Multiple, Body Weight
Gainesville, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00375089
Abnormalities, Multiple, Body Weight
Orange, California, United States
View Trial Details