Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06974500

Implementation of an Efferent Loop Stimulation Protocol Prior to Ileostomy Closure at La Paz University Hospital

Stoma creation is a common surgical procedure, employed in certain contexts within general surgery, particularly in colorectal and emergency surgery. Although stoma formation is a life-saving technique, the diversion of intestinal contents has pathophysiological, aesthetic, and psychological repercussions on patients' lives. Stomas may be either permanent or temporary. In temporary cases, a second intervention is required to perform ileostomy closure and restore normal intestinal transit.

Several studies indicate that stimulation of the efferent loop prior to ileostomy closure yields benefits in patients' postoperative outcomes. Currently, there is no established protocol for this intervention at Hospital Universitario La Paz. However, implementing such a protocol-given that it is a simple, inexpensive, and accessible intervention-could offer significant cost-effectiveness. It may reduce complications and hospital stay, improve patients' quality of life, and represent a valuable contribution to the General Surgery Departmen

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Hospital Universitario La Paz

Madrid, Spain

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Luis Dr.Asensio Gómez, Consultant

CONTACT

[email protected]

+34 650675894

About this study

Implementation of a Protocol for Efferent Limb Stimulation Prior to Ileostomy Closure at Hospital Universitario La Paz

The formation of stomas is a common surgical procedure, used in specific scenarios within general surgery, particularly in colorectal and emergency settings. While the creation of a stoma is often life-saving, the diversion of intestinal contents carries significant pathophysiological, aesthetic, and psychological repercussions for patients. Stomas may be permanent or temporary. In cases of temporary stomas, a second surgical procedure is required to close the ileostomy and re-establish normal intestinal continuity.

Several studies, as reviewed in this work, suggest that stimulation of the efferent limb prior to ileostomy closure provides measurable benefits in terms of patients' postoperative recovery. At present, however, there is no established protocol for this intervention at Hospital Universitario La Paz. This is despite its simplicity, low cost, and minimal risk, and its potential to improve patient outcomes, reduce postoperative complications, and shorten hospital stays. Implementing such a protocol could not only enhance patient care but also represent a meaningful quality improvement for the Department of General and Digestive Surgery.

The rationale behind this study is to demonstrate the clinical advantages of efferent limb stimulation before ileostomy closure and to establish a formal protocol for its use. This protocol would apply to patients with an ileostomy, regardless of the underlying condition, who are scheduled for intestinal reconstruction at Hospital Universitario La Paz. Complications following ileostomy closure are known to be common, often leading to prolonged hospitalisation. These complications result in increased direct costs from longer admissions, as well as additional use of healthcare resources through potential reoperations or pharmacological treatments.

Given these challenges, our objective is to reduce the duration of hospital stay and the incidence of complications by introducing a preoperative intervention that is both accessible and clinically effective. Efferent limb stimulation, conducted prior to closure, may provide an opportunity to mitigate common postoperative problems and improve overall patient recovery.

Our hypothesis is that stimulation of the efferent limb in patients with an ileostomy-using saline solution and thickening agents-administered between two and four weeks before intestinal reconstruction surgery, promotes faster recovery of bowel function, reduces length of hospital stay, and decreases postoperative complications. The primary outcome of interest is the reduction in the number of inpatient days, specifically measured from surgery to discharge.

Secondary objectives include evaluating the impact of the intervention on the incidence of postoperative paralytic ileus, diarrhoea, surgical site infections, and inflammatory response as indicated by C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. Additionally, the study will assess the feasibility and adherence to the newly implemented protocol.

The study is designed as a prospective cohort study with historical controls. The study population will consist of patients over the age of 18 with an ileostomy, regardless of the underlying pathology, who are scheduled for surgical restoration of intestinal continuity. Two groups will be analysed. The case group will include prospective patients who receive daily efferent limb stimulation with saline solution and a thickening agent for at least two weeks prior to surgery. The control group will consist of retrospective data from patients who underwent ileostomy closure prior to the implementation of this protocol and did not receive any form of preoperative stimulation.

Once enrolled, patients in the intervention group will follow the usual standards of care with the addition of the efferent limb stimulation protocol. All procedures and follow-up visits will be designed to ensure patient safety and will not introduce additional clinical risk

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

IInclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects must be able to understand the purpose and risks of the study, provide informed consent, and authorise the use of confidential health information.
  • Patients over 18 years of age who, regardless of the underlying cause, have an ileostomy and a medical indication for intestinal transit reconstruction by a general surgeon.
  • Subjects who are able and willing to participate and to comply with follow-up for the duration of the study.

Exclusion criteria

  • Subjects with an ileostomy who do not wish to undergo intestinal reconstruction.
  • Subjects who are unable to complete at least two weeks of efferent loop stimulation prior to reconstruction surgery.
  • Subjects who do not provide consent to participate in the study.

Treatment and study plan

Daily efferent limb stimulation for at least two weeks prior to surgery using saline solution and a thickering agent

Procedure

Participants in the intervention group will undergo daily stimulation of the efferent limb for a minimum of two weeks prior to ileostomy closure. The procedure involves the instillation of a solution composed of saline and a thickening agent through the efferent limb of the ileostomy via the inactive orifice. This is performed by the patient at home following specific training and instructions provided during a preoperative consultation.

The stimulation begins the day after the pre-anaesthesia consultation and is carried out once per day. Patients are supported with a structured follow-up, including one physical consultation in the stoma clinic, telephone contact with the research team every 48 hours, and access to an email address for queries. The objective of the intervention is to recondition the excluded colon before the restoration of intestinal continuity in order to reduce postoperative complications.

Primary outcomes

  1. LOS

    Time frame: 30 days after reconstructive surgery

    Difference in mean number of days of hospital stay between control and case group

Secondary outcomes

  1. Paralytic Ileus

    Time frame: Postoperative hospital stay (up to 15 days after surgery or until discharge, whichever occurs first)

    Percentage of patients diagnosed with paralytic ileus during admission in the case group compared to the control group

  2. Diarrhoea

    Time frame: Postoperative hospital stay (up to 15 days after surgery or until discharge, whichever occurs first)

    Percentage of patients diagnosed with diarrhoea during admission in the case group compared to the control group

  3. ISS

    Time frame: Postoperative hospital stay (up to 15 days after surgery or until discharge, whichever occurs first)

    Percentage of patients diagnosed with surgical wound infection 30 days after surgery in the case group compared to the control group

  4. Protocol

    Time frame: through study completion, an average 2 years

    Percentage of the number of patients included in the protocol compared to the total number of ileostomies reconstructed since the protocol was implemented

  5. CRP

    Time frame: Postoperative hospital stay (up to 15 days after surgery or until discharge, whichever occurs first)

    Percentage of the mean blood CRP value on the second and fourth day of patients undergoing EAE compared to the mean blood CRP value on the second and fourth day of patients without EAE.

  6. PCT

    Time frame: Postoperative hospital stay (up to 15 days after surgery or until discharge, whichever occurs first)

    Percentage of the mean blood PCT value on the second and fourth posoperative day

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Luis Dr. Asensio Gómez, Consultant

CONTACT

[email protected]

+34 650675894

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Hospital Universitario La Paz

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
May 16, 2025
Registry last updated
May 16, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.