University of Alberta
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Ross Tsuyuki, BScPharm, PharmD, MSc.
CONTACT
Stephanie Gysel, BScPharm, PharmD
CONTACT
NCT Number: NCT07339852
As of 2024, nine percent of Albertans are living with Type 2 diabetes, which increases their risk for cardiovascular disease, stroke, blindness, and kidney failure. Unfortunately, less than half of patients have controlled Type 2 diabetes. We are well aware of the factors which lead to worsening diabetes, but need to give people more support to help them manage their diabetes. Pharmacists are respected health care professionals who are often easier to see that doctors and can help people with diabetes to stay as healthy as possible.
This research project aims to see whether a pharmacist service can help improve diabetes management in people with type 2 diabetes compared to usual care from their family physician or nurse practitionner. The potential impact of this project is to empower people with type 2 diabetes to understand their condition, it's management, and to achieve target blood sugar levels, which will ultimately reduce the risk of diabetes-related complications.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Location status: Recruiting
Ross Tsuyuki, BScPharm, PharmD, MSc.
CONTACT
Stephanie Gysel, BScPharm, PharmD
CONTACT
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
articipants in the intervention arm will receive the care using a shared decision-making pharmacist care pathway approach designed to guide type 2 diabetes management to achieve target A1C levels and reduce the risk of diabetes-related complications. The pharmacist care pathway is modelled after the Canadian Diabetes Association Guidelines22. This pathway (tool) will be built into a computer web-based program and include step-by-step, algorithm-guided patient assessment to achieve target A1C levels and reduce the risk of diabetes-related complications. This will occur through follow-ups every 6 weeks for six months duration.
Time frame: Up to 6 months
The primary outcome is the difference in change in A1C calculated from baseline to the end of the study (up to six months) between the intervention and control groups.
Time frame: Up to 6 months.
The primary outcome is the difference in change in estimated CV risk from baseline to the end of the study (up to six months) between the intervention and control groups.
Time frame: Up to 6 months.
The difference in change in blood pressure from baseline to the end of the study (up to six months) between the intervention and control groups.
Time frame: Up to 6 months.
The difference in change in serum LDL-cholesterol concentration from baseline to the end of the study (up to six months) between the intervention and control groups
Time frame: Up to 6 months.
The difference in the proportion of participants who receive their influenza vaccination from baseline to the end of the study (up to six months) between the intervention and control groups.
Time frame: Up to 6 months
The difference in the proportion of participants who receive their pneumococcal vaccination from baseline to the end of the study (up to six months) between the intervention and control groups.
Time frame: Up to 6 months
The difference in the proportion of participants who complete foot exams from baseline to the end of the study (up to six months) between the intervention and control groups.
Time frame: Up to 6 months.
The difference in the proportion of participants who complete eye exams from baseline to the end of the study (up to six months) between the intervention and control groups.
Time frame: Up to 6 months.
The difference in the proportion of participants who complete renal function screening (glomerular filtraion rate, albumin to creatinine ratio) from baseline to the end of the study (up to six months) between the intervention and control groups.
Time frame: Up to 6 months.
The difference in the proportion of participants who have guideline-based vascular protection in place from baseline to the end of the study (up to six months) between the intervention and control groups.
Time frame: Up to 6 months.
Pharmacist prescribing or changing the dose of medications from baseline to the end of the study (up to six months) between the intervention and control groups.
Time frame: Up to 6 months
Education on lifestyle factors (tobacco cessation, diet, exercise) from baseline to the end of the study (up to six months) between the intervention and control groups.
Time frame: Up to 6 months
Pharmacist intervention of providing education on medications and importance of adherence from baseline to the end of the study (up to six months) between the intervention and control groups.
Time frame: Up to 6 months.
The difference in the proportion of participants who attend the laboratory for routine monitoring from baseline to the end of the study (up to six months) between the intervention and control groups.
Time frame: Up to 6 months.
The difference in the proportion of participants who use continuous glucose monitoring devices from baseline to the end of the study (up to six months) between the intervention and control groups.
Time frame: Up to 6 months.
The yield from each enrolment approach used (active case-finding approach vs. passive approaches such as when the patient attends the pharmacy to collect a prescription medication or through patient self-identification).
Time frame: Up to 6 months.
Yield of enrollment by clinic or non-clinic pharmacy type.
Time frame: Up to 6 months.
Extent to which shared decision making was achieved in the intervention as measured by the validated Shared Decision Making 9-item Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) tool. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 45, where a higher score indicates a greater subjective level of shared decision making.
Time frame: Up to 6 months.
Patient satisfaction as measured by the diabetes treatment satisfaction questionnaire standard (DTSQs). The standard version of the DTSQ consists of eight questions on a 0-6 Likert scale (where 0 is very dissatisfied and 6 is very satisfied). Minimum score = 0, maximum score = 48.
Time frame: Up to 6 months.
Patient satisfaction as measured by the diabetes treatment satisfaction questionnaire change (DTSQc). It is designed to overcome ceiling effects, where satisfaction is already high, by allowing for more precise reporting of improvements or declines, and thus must be used alongside the DTSQs to understand both the absolute satisfaction level and the change over time.
The change version of the DTSQ consists of eight questions on a 0-6 Likert scale (where 0 is very dissatisfied and 6 is very satisfied). Minimum score = 0, maximum score = 48.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Ross Tsuyuki, BScPharm, PharmD, MSc
CONTACT
Stephanie Gysel, BScPharm, PharmD
CONTACT
University of Alberta
Other
Implementation and Evaluation of a Pharmacist-led Diabetes Care Pathway in Alberta Community Pharmacies.
Acronym: D-PATH
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07025980
Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus
Šibenik, Croatia
View Trial DetailsNCT06615609
Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus
Ürümqi, Xinjiang, China
View Trial DetailsNCT06694012
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Sakai, Osaka, Japan
View Trial DetailsNCT05820295
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
New York, United States
View Trial Details