Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06989684

Implant Stability Changes Using Underdrilling Versus Osseodensification Protocols for Posterior Dental Implants

This clinical trial aims to compare two drilling protocols Underdrilling and Osseodensification for placing dental implants in patients with low bone density. The purpose is to compare which technique provides better primary and secondary implant stability in the posterior regions of the jaw with low bone density. The hypothesis is that there is no significant difference in implant stability between the two protocols.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

PGIDS

Rohtak, Haryana, 124001, India

About this study

Achieving sufficient primary stability becomes difficult in areas with low bone density. One technique commonly used is Underdrilling protocol.With the Underdrilling technique, the final osteotomy is smaller than the diameter of the implant to be placed.A relatively new Osseodensification protocol, introduced by Huwais in 2013, employs specially designed bur that smoothly compact the bone as they expand an osteotomy. This may prove to be particularly helpful in cases with low bone quality.This clinical trial aims to compare the implant stability using these drilling protocols

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient partially edentulous ridge after extraction of more than 6 months and with low bone density.
  • Systemically healthy patients ≥18 years of age.

Exclusion criteria

  • Smokers.
  • Pregnant or lactating females.
  • Uncontrolled systemic disease like diabetes, hypertension, hormonal therapy and hematologic diseases.
  • History of Maxillary sinus pathology.

Treatment and study plan

Osseodensification

Procedure

Osseodensification uses specially designed burs to densify osteotomy site

Underdrilling

Procedure

In underdrilling the osteotomy is smaller than implant diameter to be placed

Primary outcomes

  1. Implant stability

    Time frame: 12-18 months

    It compares Primary stability and Secondary stability after implant placement. Primary stability is recorded by insertion torque values from manual torque wrench. Secondary stability is recorded by resonance frequency analysis.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Chain Shilpa, MDS

CONTACT

[email protected]

+91 9814272797

Dr.Sanjay Tewari, MDS

CONTACT

[email protected]

01262-297876

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences Rohtak

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Implant Stability And Changes In Ridge Width Using Underdrilling Versus Osseodensification Protocols For Posterior Dental Implant- A Randomized Clinical Trial

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2027
First posted
May 25, 2025
Registry last updated
May 25, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.