Amira Attia
Al Mansurah, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT06976866
Background: In recent years, there has been a rise in the use of immediate loading protocols; however, the complex anatomy of the posterior maxilla presents challenges. Currently, there is a lack of comparative studies assessing the effects of hyaluronic acid and atorvastatin gel on enhancing bone density in this region in conjunction with immediate loading. This study aimed to compare the effect of topical application of atorvastatin gel versus hyaluronic acid around immediately loaded dental implant that replacing missed maxillary posterior teeth.
Patients and methods: twenty one patients were chosen from the Outpatient Clinic in the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University seeking implant placement. Patients were divided randomly and equally into three groups: group I (control group): 7 patients received implants without coating by any materials. Group II [Hyaluronic acid (HA) group]: 7 patients received implants coated with HA gel .Group III [atorvastatin (ATV) group]: 7 patients received implants coated with ATV gel. Clinical evaluation of implant stability was performed at the time of implant insertion and after 3 and 6 months postoperative. Also, peri-implant pocket depth (PPD) and modified sulcus bleeding index (mSBI) were evaluated. Radiographical evaluation of bone density (BD) was performed immediately and after 6 months postoperatively of implant loading using CBCT. All clinical and radiographic data were subjected to statistical analysis.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year–45 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Al Mansurah, Egypt
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
-
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
surgery
Other names: hyaluronic acid around implant, atorvastatin around implant
Time frame: 6 months
Clinical evaluation of implant stability was performed at the time of implant insertion and after 3 and 6 months postoperative.
Time frame: 6 months
Clinical evaluation of implant stability was performed at the time of implant insertion and after 3 and 6 months postoperative. Also, peri-implant pocket depth (PPD) and modified sulcus bleeding index (mSBI) were evaluated.
Time frame: 6 months
peri-implant pocket depth (PPD) around the implant at 3 months and 6 months after loading
Time frame: 6 months
Radiographical evaluation of bone density (BD) was performed immediately and after 6 months postoperatively of implant loading using CBCT
Time frame: 6 months
modified sulcus bleeding index (mSBI) were evaluated at 3 months and 6 months after loading
Amira attia
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07551128
Dental Implant Stability
Alexandria, Azarita, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT06989684
Dental Implant Stability
Rohtak, Haryana, India
View Trial DetailsNCT06967649
Dental Implant Stability, Implant Survival Using Immediate Loading Protocol
Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
View Trial DetailsNCT06148064
Dental Implant Stability
Alexandria, Egypt
View Trial Details