Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00804700

Impact of Two Methods of Listening to Music During Exercise on Perceived Exertion and Overall Physical Activity

The purpose of the study is to compare two different methods of listening to music while performing aerobic exercise: synchronous music listening vs. asynchronous music listening. Synchronous music listening while exercising is a learned activity where the participant moves his or her body in synchrony with the beat of the music, similar to dancing or to participating in a group exercise (aerobics) class. Our hypothesis is that synchronous music listening reduces the level of perceived exertion to the exercise and motivates the subject to exercise more often. This study randomly assigns 46 subjects, age 20-55 years old to either a control group of listening to their own favorite music in an asynchronous fashion or to an intervention group of listening to prepared music in a synchronous fashion over a six week period.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

20 year–55 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Georgetown University

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007, United States

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult employees of Georgetown University (age 20-55) who listen to music while exercising.

Exclusion criteria

:

  • A major medical condition that would prevent the participant from undertaking regular exercise
  • The use of beta blocker medication
  • Participation in varsity sports

Treatment and study plan

Active teaching in synchronous listening to music while exercising

Behavioral

Subjects will be instructed to exercise while listening to four audio tutorials that are stored on their MP-3 player. These tutorials guide the subject on how to synchronize his or her body movements to the beat of the music.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) from baseline to final test at 6 weeks intervention

    Time frame: 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Difference in exercise-related energy expenditure over six weeks between to intervention and control groups

    Time frame: 6 weeks

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Georgetown University

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2008
Primary completion
2009
Study completion
2009
First posted
Dec 9, 2008
Registry last updated
Apr 23, 2010

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.