Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05162820

Impact of Solarplast® on Immunity in Active Smokers and Non-smokers

The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of Solarplast treatment on measures of oxidative stress, immune function, skin appearance, and associated measures in 60 men and women, consisting of both cigarette smokers and nonsmokers. The hypothesis is that the Solarplast treatment will reduce oxidative stress biomarkers and favorably impact immune measures and both perceived and quantifiable measures of skin health, in both smokers and non-smokers, with a greater impact observed in smokers. Photographic analyses like the Pear Plus 3D system have been developed for clinical use for monitoring skin health.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

30 year–60 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Center for Nutraceutical and Dietary Supplement Research

Memphis, Tennessee, 38152, United States

About this study

Deerland Probiotics and Enzymes has developed a dietary supplement called Solarplast®, which is an organic spinach extract, currently being sold on the market (Solarplast - Deerland Probiotics and Enzymes). It contains a unique mixture of antioxidant enzymes and single antioxidant molecules that work to attack reactive oxygen species (ROS) through chaperone activity. These chaperones are naturally occurring proteins that provide protection from stress, such as ROS, heat, and infection, and can lead to reduced inflammation and alteration in immune function.

Spinach is rich in select vitamins and minerals, such as iron, vitamin A, riboflavin, and lutein-a carotenoid that acts as a natural antioxidant, protecting the body from toxins and ROS. Solarplast is thought to exhibit antioxidant protection against ROS, while also containing photosynthetic complexes with high concentrations of ATP, NADPH, ADP, AMP, NADP, niacin, B12, adenine, and ribose. Therefore, it may provide the components required to scavenge free radicals and mitigate ensuing damage from ROS.

In living cells, ROS such as singlet oxygen (·O), superoxide radical (O2· -), and hydroxyl radical (·OH) are continuously formed as a consequence of normal cellular metabolism and are increased under conditions of environmental stress. Production of ROS in quantities that overwhelm the endogenous antioxidant defense system leads to oxidative stress, and this oxidative stress is strongly linked to the pathogenesis of numerous diseases, including diabetes, cancer, and cardiovascular disease.

Oxidative stress leads to increases in proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-1B and TNF-alpha. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) can induce ROS and proinflammatory cytokines. Antioxidants present in spinach may provide some protection against LPS actions.

It is well known that cigarette smoking exacerbates ROS formation and poses a significant pro-oxidant stress in vivo. In one puff of a cigarette, the smoker is exposed to >1015 free radicals in the gas phase alone, with additional exposure in the tar phase equal to >1017 free radicals·g-1. This direct exposure represents only a fraction of the total oxidative stress experienced, as cigarette smoke contributes to further endogenous ROS production mediated through inflammatory and immune processes. ROS formation due to cigarette smoking is thought to contribute to premature skin aging . Carotenoids like lutein in spinach, are believed to help protect skin from this ROS damage. Therefore, treating smokers with antioxidant therapy may not only alter immune function and measures of oxidative stress, but also prove helpful to both perceptions and measures of skin health.

Antioxidant supplementation can also reduce oxidative stress, which is linked to cognitive/mental health. Those who are exposed to high levels of oxidants and who are in a chronic state of oxidative stress (e.g., smokers) may be more susceptible to impaired mental health.

A previous clinical research trial evaluating Solarplast titled "Efficacy of Solarplast for Health and Oxidative Stress, A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study" noted improved antioxidant defense and immunity, as well as improved subjective feelings of health (e.g., decreased irritability, decreased tension and anxiety), and improved self-reported skin health in a sample of smokers and non-smokers. The present study seeks to extend these findings in a larger sample of smokers.

The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of Solarplast treatment on measures of oxidative stress, immune function, skin appearance, and associated measures in 60 men and women, consisting of both cigarette smokers and nonsmokers. We hypothesize that the Solarplast treatment will reduce oxidative stress biomarkers and favorably impact immune measures and both perceived and quantifiable measures of skin health, in both smokers and non-smokers, with a greater impact observed in smokers. Smoking, causes a decrease in blood flow to skin and dryness along with other adverse effects that can prematurely age skin. As quantifiable measures provide more sound evidence than personal perceptions when evaluating skin treatments, there has been a greater push for more analytical methods in the assessment of skin regimens which include topographical, pigmentation, color, as well as other measures that will be employed in this study via photographical image analysis of subject's facial skin. Photographic analyses like the Pear Plus 3D system have been developed for clinical use for monitoring skin health.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • body mass index (BMI) between 18-40 kg/m2 (not morbidly obese)
  • if a smoker, smokes at least 5 cigarettes per day for the past 12 months
  • if a smoker, experience occasional mild skin irritations (e.g., rash, dryness, redness, itching, etc.)
  • if non-smoker, not have used tobacco products or any smoked product (e.g., marijuana, cigar, pipe) in the past 12 months
  • if non-smoker, not exposed to regular second-hand smoke (e.g., lives with or works in close proximity to a smoker)
  • no consumption of alcohol-containing beverages within 48 hours of testing
  • no consumption of caffeine-containing beverages within 24 hours of testing
  • without active infection or illness of any kind
  • if female, not be pregnant
  • able to fast overnight (10-12 hours)
  • Not have doctor prescribed immune function or antioxidant nutritional supplements, over the counter medications, or prescription drugs that might impact outcomes (e.g. Vitamin-C, elderberry, ginger, turmeric, quercetin, supplements with "Immun" or have immunity on their label, Immunosuppressives: prednisolone, Azathioprine, Mycophenolate mofetil, Monoclonal antibodies - of which there are many ending in "mab", such as bevacizumab, rituximab and trastuzumab, Anti-TNF drugs such as etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab and golimumab, Methotrexate, Ciclosporin, Tacrolimus, Sirolimus, Cyclophosphamide, Leflunomide, Immunotherapies: Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors, Adoptive Cell Therapies, Monoclonal Antibodies, Oncolytic Virus Therapy, Immune System Modulators, etc.)
  • be willing to stop non-prescribed immune function or antioxidant nutritional supplements and over the counter medications (e.g. Vitamin-C, elderberry, ginger, turmeric, quercetin, supplements with "Immun" or have immunity on their label, etc.) one month prior to and through the duration of the study

Exclusion criteria

-

Treatment and study plan

100 mg Solarplast

Dietary Supplement

100 mg Solarplast delivered in capsules with the carrier of rice dextrin and medium chain triglycerides consumed daily at breakfast for 60 days

Placebo

Dietary Supplement

rice dextrin and medium chain triglycerides in capsules consumed daily at breakfast for 60 days

Primary outcomes

  1. Plasma Cytokine Panel

    Time frame: baseline

    Cytokines analyzed from plasma for IL-1beta, IL-6, IL-10, and TNF-alpha

  2. Plasma Cytokine Panel

    Time frame: after 30 days of treatment

    Plasma analyzed for IL-1beta, IL-6, IL-10, and TNF-alpha

  3. Plasma Cytokine Panel

    Time frame: after 60 days of treatment

    Plasama analyzed for IL-1beta, IL-6, IL-10, and TNF-alpha

  4. Plasma Cytokine Panel on LPS treated whole blood

    Time frame: baseline

    LPS treated whole blood analyzed for IL-1beta, IL-6, IL-10, and TNF-alpha

  5. Plasma Cytokine Panel on LPS treated whole blood

    Time frame: after 30 days of treatment

    LPS treated whole blood analyzed for IL-1beta, IL-6, IL-10, and TNF-alpha

  6. Plasma Cytokine Panel on LPS treated whole blood

    Time frame: after 60 days of treatment

    LPS treated whole blood analyzed for IL-1beta, IL-6, IL-10, and TNF-alpha

  7. Protein oxidation

    Time frame: baseline

    Blood sample analyzed for protein oxidation

  8. Protein oxidation

    Time frame: after 30 days of treatment

    Blood sample analyzed for protein oxidation

  9. Protein oxidation

    Time frame: after 60 days of treatment

    Blood sample analyzed for protein oxidation

  10. Lipid peroxidation

    Time frame: baseline

    Blood sample analyzed for lipid peroxidation

  11. Lipid peroxidation

    Time frame: after 30 days of treatment

    Blood sample analyzed for lipid peroxidation

  12. Lipid peroxidation

    Time frame: after 60 days of treatment

    Blood sample analyzed for lipid peroxidation

  13. Subjects' perceived mental health

    Time frame: baseline

    Subject's self-report different measures of mental health using a questionnaire with a scale of 1 (None of the time) to 5 (All of the time)

  14. Subjects' perceived mental health

    Time frame: 1 week of treatment

    Subject's self-report different measures of mental health using a questionnaire with a scale of 1 (None of the time) to 5 (All of the time)

  15. Subjects' perceived mental health

    Time frame: 2 weeks of treatment

    Subject's self-report different measures of mental health using a questionnaire with a scale of 1 (None of the time) to 5 (All of the time)

  16. Subjects' perceived mental health

    Time frame: 3 weeks of treatment

    Subject's self-report different measures of mental health using a questionnaire with a scale of 1 (None of the time) to 5 (All of the time)

  17. Subjects' perceived mental health

    Time frame: 4 weeks of treatment

    Subject's self-report different measures of mental health using a questionnaire with a scale of 1 (None of the time) to 5 (All of the time)

  18. Subjects' perceived mental health

    Time frame: 5 weeks of treatment

    Subject's self-report different measures of mental health using a questionnaire with a scale of 1 (None of the time) to 5 (All of the time)

  19. Subjects' perceived mental health

    Time frame: 6 weeks of treatment

    Subject's self-report different measures of mental health using a questionnaire with a scale of 1 (None of the time) to 5 (All of the time)

  20. Subjects' perceived mental health

    Time frame: 7 weeks of treatment

    Subject's self-report different measures of mental health using a questionnaire with a scale of 1 (None of the time) to 5 (All of the time)

  21. Subjects' perceived mental health

    Time frame: 8 weeks of treatment

    Subject's self-report different measures of mental health using a questionnaire with a scale of 1 (None of the time) to 5 (All of the time)

  22. Subject's perceived general health and well-being

    Time frame: baseline

    ubject's self-report different aspects of general health and well-being using a questionnaire with a scale of 1 (None) to 5 (Severe)

  23. Subject's perceived general health and well-being

    Time frame: 1 week of treatment

    ubject's self-report different aspects of general health and well-being using a questionnaire with a scale of 1 (None) to 5 (Severe)

  24. Subject's perceived general health and well-being

    Time frame: 2 weeks of treatment

    ubject's self-report different aspects of general health and well-being using a questionnaire with a scale of 1 (None) to 5 (Severe)

  25. Subject's perceived general health and well-being

    Time frame: 3 weeks of treatment

    ubject's self-report different aspects of general health and well-being using a questionnaire with a scale of 1 (None) to 5 (Severe)

  26. Subject's perceived general health and well-being

    Time frame: 4 weeks of treatment

    ubject's self-report different aspects of general health and well-being using a questionnaire with a scale of 1 (None) to 5 (Severe)

  27. Subject's perceived general health and well-being

    Time frame: 5 weeks of treatment

    ubject's self-report different aspects of general health and well-being using a questionnaire with a scale of 1 (None) to 5 (Severe)

  28. Subject's perceived general health and well-being

    Time frame: 6 weeks of treatment

    ubject's self-report different aspects of general health and well-being using a questionnaire with a scale of 1 (None) to 5 (Severe)

  29. Subject's perceived general health and well-being

    Time frame: 7 weeks of treatment

    ubject's self-report different aspects of general health and well-being using a questionnaire with a scale of 1 (None) to 5 (Severe)

  30. Subject's perceived general health and well-being

    Time frame: 8 weeks of treatment

    ubject's self-report different aspects of general health and well-being using a questionnaire with a scale of 1 (None) to 5 (Severe)

  31. Subject's perceived skin health

    Time frame: baseline

    ubject's self-report their perception of their skin health for different skin qualities using a questionnaire with a scale of 1 (Very Bad) to 5 (Very Good)

  32. Subject's perceived skin health

    Time frame: 1 week of treatment

    ubject's self-report their perception of their skin health for different skin qualities using a questionnaire with a scale of 1 (Very Bad) to 5 (Very Good)

  33. Subject's perceived skin health

    Time frame: 2 weeks of treatment

    ubject's self-report their perception of their skin health for different skin qualities using a questionnaire with a scale of 1 (Very Bad) to 5 (Very Good)

  34. Subject's perceived skin health

    Time frame: 3 weeks of treatment

    ubject's self-report their perception of their skin health for different skin qualities using a questionnaire with a scale of 1 (Very Bad) to 5 (Very Good)

  35. Subject's perceived skin health

    Time frame: 4 weeks of treatment

    ubject's self-report their perception of their skin health for different skin qualities using a questionnaire with a scale of 1 (Very Bad) to 5 (Very Good)

  36. Subject's perceived skin health

    Time frame: 5 weeks of treatment

    ubject's self-report their perception of their skin health for different skin qualities using a questionnaire with a scale of 1 (Very Bad) to 5 (Very Good)

  37. Subject's perceived skin health

    Time frame: 6 weeks of treatment

    ubject's self-report their perception of their skin health for different skin qualities using a questionnaire with a scale of 1 (Very Bad) to 5 (Very Good)

  38. Subject's perceived skin health

    Time frame: 7 weeks of treatment

    ubject's self-report their perception of their skin health for different skin qualities using a questionnaire with a scale of 1 (Very Bad) to 5 (Very Good)

  39. Subject's perceived skin health

    Time frame: 8 weeks of treatment

    ubject's self-report their perception of their skin health for different skin qualities using a questionnaire with a scale of 1 (Very Bad) to 5 (Very Good)

  40. Quantitative Skin measures

    Time frame: baseline

    A skin report will generated using the 3D Pear Plus system

  41. Quantitative Skin measures

    Time frame: 30 days of treatment

    A skin report will generated using the 3D Pear Plus system

  42. Quantitative Skin measures

    Time frame: 60 days of treatment

    A skin report will generated using the 3D Pear Plus system

Secondary outcomes

  1. Food Logs

    Time frame: baseline

    Dietary intake will be reported for the 5 days prior to the study visit

  2. Food Logs

    Time frame: 30 days of treatment

    Dietary intake will be reported for the 5 days prior to the study visit

  3. Food Logs

    Time frame: 60 days of treatment

    Dietary intake will be reported for the 5 days prior to the study visit

  4. Resting blood pressure

    Time frame: baseline

    Blood pressure will be measured following a 10 minute rest

  5. Resting blood pressure

    Time frame: 30 days of treatment

    Blood pressure will be measured following a 10 minute rest

  6. Resting blood pressure

    Time frame: 60 days of treatment

    Blood pressure will be measured following a 10 minute rest

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Memphis

Other

Collaborators

  • Deerland Probiotics and Enzymes

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Dec 17, 2021
Registry last updated
Sep 26, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.