Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04846660

Impact of Production Pressure in the Block Room on Patient Safety

This randomized, single blinded simulation based study investigates the impact that production pressure can have on the safety of patients undergoing regional anesthesia. We created a high fidelity scenario where anesthesiologists and trainees were to perform a single shot infraclavicular ultrasound guided block. Participants were randomly assigned to the intervention or control group. Participants assigned to the intervention group were exposed to various production pressure generating interventions. The goal of this study was to look at the impact of production pressure on patient safety by scoring anesthesiologists' and trainees' performance and examining the differences between the two groups.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Hopital Maisonneuve-Rosemont

Montreal, Quebec, H1T 2M4, Canada

About this study

Sample size:

To our knowledge, no studies were performed to evaluate the impact of production pressure on anesthesiologists nor on how to emulate production pressure in a simulated environment. Although it is known that production pressure affects negatively healthcare workers' performance, it remains difficult to predict its impact on a scoring system such as the RAPS assessment tool. Therefore, we used a convenience sample based on the number of residents and staffs anesthesiologists who agreed to participate. Using the t value and the degrees-of-freedom of the unpaired t-test, the investigators calculated the effect size (r) to characterize the magnitude of the effect and evaluate if the sample size is enough to answer the research hypothesis. An r value of around 0.2 was considered a "weak" effect, 0.5 "medium", and 0.8 "strong". We intend to recruit between 10 to 20 participants in each group.

Scenario:

Participants were asked to obtain consent and perform a single shot infraclavicular ultrasound guided block on a 50 year old woman with mild COPD. The simulation took place in situ in a regional anesthesia block room. Upon entering the room, the anesthesiology evaluation was already completed. A CAE infraclavicular block simulator was installed on a simulated patient. A simulated anesthesiology nurse was also present to assist only. All preparation steps and safety measures had to be initiated by the participant. Participants in the intervention group were exposed to 4 standardized pre-recorded audio interventions, encouraging them to proceed faster. The choice of these interventions was based on articles and surveys detailing the common sources of production pressure for the anesthesiologist.

Data collection:

Performances were filmed in order to be reviewed by three regional anesthesia experts. Participants were then asked to fulfill a questionnaire in another room. This form included a validated task load index grid (NASA) to quantify the amount of stress experienced, demographic data and a realism score.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • To be a certified anesthesiologist or anesthesiology resident
  • To have performed at least 10 regional anesthesia techniques including 5 infraclavicular blocks
  • To consent to the study

Exclusion criteria

  • To refuse to participate

Treatment and study plan

Production pressure

Other

Participant exposed to production pressure

Primary outcomes

  1. RAPS score

    Time frame: Through scenario completion (approximatively 25 minutes)

    Score obtained from regional anesthesia experts using the RAPS assessment tool, a validated tool to measure performance of a regional anesthesia technique (see reference)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to complete the task

    Time frame: Through scenario completion (approximatively 25 minutes)

    Time between skin asepsis and needle withdrawal

  2. Stress level experienced

    Time frame: Through scenario completion (approximatively 25 minutes)

    As measured by the NASA task load index, a validated tool to measure mental and physical stress experience during a task.

    The participant has to rate each 6 category on a continous scale of 21 points as shown below.

    Mental Demand From very low to very high Physical Demand From very low to very high Temporal demand From very low to very high Performance From perfect to failure (This scale in interpreted in a reverse way) Effort From very low to very high Frustration From very low to very high The next step for the participant is to do a pairwise comparison of each category by selection the most contributive.

    Results are presented with transformation of the 21 points to a 100 points scale as a rating from 0 to 100 ( Low to high task load) By using pairwise comparison, a weighted global result is also presented with a score from 0 to 100 (Low to high task load)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Ciusss de L'Est de l'Île de Montréal

Other

Collaborators

  • Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital
  • Université de Montréal

Registry information

Official study title

Examining the Impact of Production Pressure in the Regional Anesthesia Block Room on Patient Safety, a Randomized Single Blind Study in a High Fidelity Simulation Environment

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Apr 15, 2021
Registry last updated
Aug 20, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.