Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04619264

Impact of Minimally Invasive Restorative Techniques on Pregnant Women Oral Health Related Quality of Life

Aim of the study was to compare the effect of chemo-mechanical caries removal methods using Papacarie-Duo and alternative restorative treatment (ART) on the Oral Health Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) of pregnant women.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Quality of Life Dental Caries Stomatognathic Diseases Tooth Demineralization Tooth Diseases

Age range

18 year–45 year

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Family Health Centers

Alexandria, 21527, Egypt

About this study

A randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted in 2019 and included 162 pregnant women visiting family health centers in Alexandria, Egypt with mild to moderate dental pain due to caries. Participants were randomly assigned into Papacarie-Dup group (n=82) and ART group (n=80). The outcome variable was percent change in OHRQoL measured by OHIP-14.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Having at least one carious lesion involving dentine with lesion accessible to hand instruments (International Caries Detection and Assessment System score= 5 or 6).
  • Suffering from at least mild dental pain as identified by a score of at least 5mm on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) 100-mm-long.

Exclusion criteria

  • Pregnant women with acute pulpitis, swelling or fistula.
  • Uncooperative patients and those who refused to participate.

Treatment and study plan

Papacarie

Drug

First, tooth was cleaned with a wet cotton pellet. The gel was inserted using disposable syringe tip into the cavity and its color changed from clear to cloudy indicating the presence of infected tissues. After 40 seconds, the softened carious tissue was removed using excavator by gentle pressure. The remaining gel was removed with a cotton pellet. The procedure was repeated until there was no change in the gel color indicating that there was no more infected tissue.

Other names: Papacarie-Duo

Atraumatic Restorative Treatment

Procedure

The tooth was cleaned with a wet cotton pellet to remove debris and plaque and then isolated with cotton rolls to promote a dry environment. Caries was removed using a sharp excavator and the cavity was cleaned using a small wet cotton pellet and dried with a dry cotton pellet.

Other names: ART

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Oral Health Related Quality of Life

    Time frame: up to 6 months

    This was assessed by measuring changes between the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14). The OHIP-14 includes 14 questions in seven dimensions with two questions for each dimension: functional limitation, physical pain, psychological discomfort, physical disability, psychological disability, social disability and handicap. Responses to the OHIP-14 items were measured on a 5-pont Likert scale ranging from never = 0; hardly ever = 1; occasionally = 2; fairly often = 3; to very often = 4. The OHIP-14 score is the sum of the scores of the 14 statements and ranges from 0 to 56 and from 0 to 8 for each dimension with higher scores indicating higher frequency of negative impact.

  2. Retention of the final restoration

    Time frame: up to 6 months

    The scoring system was as follows: 0=present, without defect; 1=present, small defects on the margin measuring less than 0.5 mm in depth, with no need for repair; 2=present, small defects on the margin measuring 0.5 to 1.0 mm in depth, with need for repair; 3=present, gross defects on the margin measuring 1.0 mm or more in depth, with need for repair; 4=absent, restoration completely lost, need for treatment; 5=absent, other treatment had been performed for some reason; 6=tooth absent for some reason; 7=present, wear on surface less than 0.5 mm, with no need for replacement; 8=present, wear on surface greater than 0.5 mm, with need for replacement; 9=diagnosis impossible. Restorations having a score of 0, 1 or 7 were considered successful and those receiving a score of 2, 3, 4 or 8 were considered failures.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Nourhan M.Aly

Other

Collaborators

  • Alexandria University

Registry information

Official study title

Impact of Minimally Invasive Restorative Techniques on Pregnant Women Oral Health Related Quality of Life: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Nov 6, 2020
Registry last updated
Dec 4, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.