Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01810965

Impact of Bloodletting on Iron Metabolism in Type 1 Hemochromatosis

Hemochromatosis type 1 is one of the most frequent genetic disease since the genetic predisposition (homozygosity for the C282Y mutation of the HFE gene) is encountered in about 3/1000 white subjects (5/1000 in Brittany, France).

For the half of these predisposed subjects, the phenotypic expression of the disease needs a treatment. This treatment is based upon repeated bloodletting which is generally considered as simple, safe and effective.

Nevertheless, it is still questioned as regard its physiopathological justification and its clinical implications. Indeed, bloodletting could cause an increase of non-transferrin bound iron (NTBI) particularly for its reactive form called labile plasma iron (LPI) This adverse physiopathological effect could have clinical consequences and could be linked with articular consequences which can be aggravated by the treatment.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

Hemochromatosis type 1 is one of the most frequent genetic disease since the genetic predisposition (homozygosity for the C282Y mutation of the HFE gene) is encountered in about 3/1000 white subjects (5/1000 in Brittany, France).

For the half of these predisposed subjects, the phenotypic expression of the disease needs a treatment. This treatment is based upon repeated bloodletting which is generally considered as simple, safe and effective.

Nevertheless, it is still questioned as regard its physiopathological justification and its clinical implications. Indeed, bloodletting could cause an increase of non-transferrin bound iron (NTBI) particularly for its reactive form called labile plasma iron (LPI) This adverse physiopathological effect could have clinical consequences and could be linked with articular consequences which can be aggravated by the treatment.

The primary objective is to explore the effect of bloodletting upon plasmatic concentrations of NTBI.

The secondary objectives are to:

  • explore the impact of bloodletting upon different parameters of iron metabolism and in particular LPI, hepcidinemia and markers of erythropoiesis ;
  • explore basal and nycthemeral characteristics of new parameters of iron metabolism (hepcidin, NTBI, LPI) in hemochromatosis patients.

The demonstration of an adverse effect of bloodletting upon iron metabolism would allow for a therapeutic innovation based upon an association of bloodletting and oral chelation during the induction treatment of type 1 hemochromatosis and, more generally in hepcidino deficient forms of hemochromatosis.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Men
  • Age 18 years or older
  • Homozygosity for the C282Y mutation of the HFE gene
  • With an indication of treatment by bloodletting (in accordance with the French HAS guidelines)
  • Ferritinemia ≥ 500µg/L
  • Transferrin saturation ≥ 75%
  • Never treated by bloodletting
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Contraindication to bloodletting
  • Chronic inflammatory or dysmetabolic or neoplastic disease
  • Major cardiovascular disease
  • Excessive consumption of alcohol (≥ 3gr/day)
  • Treatment by iron chelators, C or E vitamins
  • Stay in altitude> 1500m in the month preceding the period Day 1
  • Patients under guardianship
  • Blood donation in the 3 past months
  • Night / shift workers

Treatment and study plan

First evaluation phase : no intervention / Second evaluation phase: bloodletting of 7 ml/kg (with a maximum of 500ml)

Procedure

Primary outcomes

  1. Maximal variation (delta maximum) of NTBI during the 5 days following a bloodletting

    Time frame: Day 5

Secondary outcomes

  1. Kinetic of NTBI plasmatic concentration during the 5 days following a bloodletting

    Time frame: Day 5

  2. Maximal variation (delta maximum) of LPI during the 5 days following a bloodletting

    Time frame: Day 5

  3. Maximal variation (delta maximum) of hepcidin during the 5 days following a bloodletting

    Time frame: Day 5

  4. Kinetic of LPI plasmatic concentration during the 5 days following a bloodletting

    Time frame: Day 5

  5. Kinetic of hepcidin plasmatic concentration during the 5 days following a bloodletting

    Time frame: Day 5

  6. CRP

    Time frame: Day 9, day 10, day 11 and day 12

  7. Hemoglobin

    Time frame: Day 9, day 10, day 11 and day 12

  8. Soluble transferrin receptor

    Time frame: Day 9, day 10, day 11 and day 12

  9. EPO

    Time frame: Day 9, day 10, day 11 and day 12

  10. Circadian kinetic of NTBI plasmatic concentration when no bloodletting is performed

    Time frame: Day 1

  11. Circadian kinetic of API plasmatic concentration when no bloodletting is performed

    Time frame: Day 1

  12. Circadian kinetic of hepcidine plasmatic concentration when no bloodletting is performed

    Time frame: Day 1

  13. Maximal variation (delta maximum) of transferrin saturation during the 5 days following a bloodletting

    Time frame: Day 5

  14. Kinetic of transferrin saturation during the 5 days following a bloodletting

    Time frame: Day 5

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Rennes University Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Impact of Bloodletting on Iron Metabolism in Type 1 Hemochromatosis: Pathophysiological and Clinical Implications. Pilot Study.

Acronym: SAIFER

Important dates

Study start
2013
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Mar 14, 2013
Registry last updated
Jun 11, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.