Hôpital Necker Enfants-Malades
Paris, 75015, France
NCT Number: NCT03274375
The purpose of the study is to assess the efficacy of immunoadsorption therapy (IA) on improving the neurological status of severe pediatric anti-NMDAR encephalitis patients.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeUp to 18 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Paris, 75015, France
Anti-NMDA-Receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis, the most frequent autoimmune encephalitis after Acute Demyelinating encephalomyelitis (ADEM), affects children with predominant movement disorders, decline of consciousness, psychiatric symptoms, language dysfunction, seizures, dysautonomic symptoms. The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is most often abnormal with lymphocytic pleocytosis, CSF-specific oligoclonal bands with intrathecal synthesis of anti-NMDAR antibodies. Antibody titres in CSF and serum seem correlated with clinical outcome. Early start of immunotherapy has been reported to improve clinical outcome and associated with less relapses. In a recent large series (211 children/577), 77% of the patients were admitted to Intensive Care Unit (ICU) at the beginning. Within the group of children, first-line immunotherapy (95%) consisted of corticosteroids (89%), and/or intravenous immunoglobulins (IgIV) (83%), and/or plasma exchange (28%) with failure in 46%. The second-line immunotherapy consisting in rituximab (24%) and/or cyclophosphamide (16%) was proposed in 32%, and tended to be associated with good outcome (OR=3.35, CI: 0.86-12.98, p=0.081 for 53 children; statistical significance was achieved for the entire population including adults (OR: 2.69, CI: 1.24-5.80, p = 0.012) and less relapses.
In investigators' experience, the clinical benefit of rituximab is delayed over one month, while children go on worsening (50% admitted in ICU) thus claiming for faster removal of the antibodies. Plasma exchange is proposed in most of the series as alternative or combined treatment in the acute stage (first-line immunotherapy); recently, another plasmatherapy, immunoadsorption therapy (IA), has been reported as an efficient therapeutic approach in 11/13 patients. In this retrospective study, patients received a median of 6 IA sessions within a median period of 8 days with relevant clinical improvement. However these encouraging results and investigators' experience in few children need further prospective and standardized evaluation.
In IANMDAR study, each patient will receive 10 IA sessions during 28 days maximum. Rituximab will be given each week for 4 weeks (one injection by week +/- 3 days):
To assess the efficacy of IA-therapy at short term, the neurological status of patients will be evaluated before and after the 10 IA sessions using the Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category Scale (PCPCS) and the modified Rankin Scale (mRS).
To assess the efficacy of IA-therapy at long term, patients will have a standardized follow-up during two years including neuropsychological evaluation at 1 year and at 2 years (see below for further details).
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
10 IA sessions performed in 28 days maximum, using TherasorbTM adsorbers which contain sheep derived polyvalent antihuman-immunoglobulin coupled to SepharoseTM CL-4B.
Concomitantly, Rituximab will be given each week for 4 weeks (one injection by week +/- 3 days):
Time frame: before and after the 10 IA sessions, 28 days maximum
at least reduction of 1 point in PCPCS between the two evaluations is expected
Time frame: before and after the 10 IA sessions, 28 days maximum
at least reduction of 1 point in mRS between the two evaluations is expected
Time frame: 28 days
To assess immunoadsorption therapy at short term in pediatric severe anti-NMDAR encephalitis patients
Time frame: 28 days
To assess immunoadsorption therapy at short term in pediatric severe anti-NMDAR encephalitis patients
Time frame: 28 days
To assess immunoadsorption therapy at short term in pediatric severe anti-NMDAR encephalitis patients
Time frame: 28 days
To assess immunoadsorption therapy at short term in pediatric severe anti-NMDAR encephalitis patients
Time frame: 28 days
independent ambulation, enteral feeding, responsiveness to simple instructions and verbal communication (first word)
Time frame: 28 days
To assess immunoadsorption therapy at short term in pediatric severe anti-NMDAR encephalitis patients
Time frame: 28 days
To assess immunoadsorption therapy at short term in pediatric severe anti-NMDAR encephalitis patients
Time frame: 28 days
before and after IA sessions
Time frame: 28 days
at diagnosis and after IA sessions
Time frame: 28 days
To assess immunoadsorption therapy at short term in pediatric severe anti-NMDAR encephalitis patients
Time frame: 28 days
To assess tolerance of IA therapy
Time frame: 28 days
to assess need of sedation
Time frame: 28 days
To assess tolerance of IA therapy
Time frame: 28 days
To assess tolerance of IA therapy
Time frame: 28 days
To assess tolerance of IA therapy
Time frame: 28 days
To assess tolerance of IA therapy
Time frame: 28 days
To assess tolerance of IA therapy
Time frame: 28 days
To assess tolerance of IA therapy
Time frame: 28 days
To assess tolerance of IA therapy
Time frame: 3 months
To assess Immunoadsorption therapy at long term
Time frame: 3 months
To assess Immunoadsorption therapy at long term
Time frame: 6 months
To assess Immunoadsorption therapy at long term
Time frame: 6 months
To assess Immunoadsorption therapy at long term
Time frame: 1 year
To assess Immunoadsorption therapy at long term
Time frame: at 2 years
To assess Immunoadsorption therapy at long term
Time frame: 1 year
To assess Immunoadsorption therapy at long term
Time frame: at 2 years
To assess Immunoadsorption therapy at long term
Time frame: 2 years
To assess Immunoadsorption therapy at long term
Time frame: 2 years
To assess Immunoadsorption therapy at long term
Time frame: 2 years
To assess Immunoadsorption therapy at long term
Time frame: 1 year
Time frame: at 2 years
Time frame: 1 year
Time frame: at 2 years
Time frame: 1 year
Time frame: at 2 years
Time frame: 1 year
Time frame: at 2 years
Time frame: 1 year
Time frame: at 2 years
Time frame: 1 year
Time frame: 2 years
Time frame: 1 year
Time frame: 2 years
Time frame: 1 year
Time frame: 2 years
Time frame: 3 months
To assess Immunoadsorption therapy at long term
Time frame: 3 months
To assess Immunoadsorption therapy at long term
Time frame: 6 months
To assess Immunoadsorption therapy at long term
Time frame: 6 months
To assess Immunoadsorption therapy at long term
Time frame: 1 year
To assess Immunoadsorption therapy at long term
Time frame: 2 years
To assess Immunoadsorption therapy at long term
Time frame: 1 year
To assess Immunoadsorption therapy at long term
Time frame: at 2 years
To assess Immunoadsorption therapy at long term
Time frame: 2 years
Time frame: 6 months
titration at 6 months
Time frame: 1 year
titration at 1 year
Time frame: 3 months
titration at 3 months
Time frame: 6 months
titration at 6 months
Time frame: 1 year
titration at 1 year
Time frame: 6 months
titration at 6 months
Time frame: 1 year
titration at 1 year
Time frame: 1 year
checked at 1 year
Time frame: 3 months
checked at 3 months
Time frame: 6 months
checked at 6 months
Time frame: 6 months
checked at 6 months
Time frame: 1 year
checked at 1 year
Time frame: 3 months
checked at 3 months
Time frame: 6 months
checked at 6 months
Time frame: 1 year
checked at 1 year
Time frame: 6 months
checked at 6 months
Time frame: 1 year
checked at 1 year
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Other
Prospective Assessment of Efficacy of Immunoadsorption Therapy in Managing Childhood NMDA-Receptor (NMDAR) Antibodies Encephalitis
Acronym: IANMDAR
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05017142
Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis, Anti-AMPAR-1/2 Associated Autoimmune Encephalitis
Aarau, Canton of Aargau, Switzerland
View Trial DetailsNCT06915103
Anti-N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor Encephalitis, Anti-NMDA Receptor Encephalitis
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01865578
Anti-N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor Encephalitis, Anti-NMDA Receptor Encephalitis
Berlin, State of Berlin, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT06867991
Anti-N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor Encephalitis, Autoimmune Diseases
Zhengzhou, Henan, China
View Trial Details