Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT07213388

Immersive Virtual Reality vs Treadmill Exercise Project

The purpose of this research project is to examine the feasibility and acceptability of a virtual reality-based physical activity (VRPA) intervention for inactive adults compared to more traditional forms of physical activity. The project will explore the relationship between VRPA engagement and cognition, biological measures (calories burned, heart rate, and active minutes), rate of perceived exertion, flow, affect, and enjoyment in physical activity as well.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–64 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Rowan University

Glassboro, New Jersey, 08028, United States

About this study

The feasibility and acceptability of a Virtual Reality Physical Activity (VRPA) intervention will be examined. VRPA will be compared with more traditional modes of physical activity (e.g., walking on a treadmill) with regard to physical biomarkers (i.e., heart rate, calories burned, active minutes), flow state (i.e., Flow Short Scale), cognition (e.g., Stroop Test, Trail Making Test, Digital version of the WRAML-2 Symbolic Working Memory Test-Part 1, and Digital Backward Digit Span), affect (e.g., Activation-Deactivation Adjective List and DASS-21), perceived exertion (e.g., Borg's Rate of Perceived Exertion and one question regarding how hard they think they will exert themselves), willingness (i.e., to pay, intent to engage in physical activity), and physical enjoyment (i.e., Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale).

  • Recruit and enroll 60 participants

a. Participants will be recruited through the SONA system (i.e., student pool for collecting psychological research), word-of-mouth, email lists, flyers, and online classified ads

  • Participants will be screened to ensure they meet the inclusion criteria
  • Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three conditions (VR, Treadmill + Music, Sitting + Music)
  • Participants will complete baseline measures a. Demographic information will be collected (e.g., ethnicity, height, weight, experience with exergames, current physical activity, physical activity readiness) b. Participants will: i. Complete the following surveys
  • Cognition 2. Affect 3. How hard do they think they will exert themselves 4. Willingness ii. Get the following measurements taken:
  • Heart Rate (HR) 6. Participants will engage in a warm-up/acclimation period on either the VR exergame or treadmill condition 7. Participants will engage in exercise for 20-30 minutes in the VR/treadmill condition, or sit quietly listening to music (control condition)
  • HR will be measured during all 3 conditions
  • The treadmill condition will be configured to a level that allows participants to engage in comfortable conversation while experiencing some breathlessness (i.e., brisk/moderate pace) 8. Post-exercise/sitting, participants will

a. Complete the following surveys: i. Feasibility ii. Acceptability iii. Cognition iv. Flow v. Affect vi. Borg's Rate of Perceived Exertion (RPE) vii. Willingness viii. Physical Enjoyment b. Get the following measurements taken: i. Heart Rate ii. Calories burned

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Be inactive (i.e., do not meet physical activity guidelines)
  • have no current neurological, psychiatric, sensory, or motor impairment, and normal or corrected-to-normal vision (only thin wire glasses or contacts can be used)
  • have no history of motion sickness
  • have the ability to exercise based on the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire for Everyone (PAR-Q+) (Warburton et al., 2019)
  • Have not fallen to the point of injury in the last 6 months.
  • Be willing to wear an activity tracker
  • 18-64 years,

Exclusion criteria

  • Do not meet the inclusion criteria
  • Struggle to use operate a VR headset
  • Cannot read
  • Have concerns about balance/falling while using a VR headset,
  • Unable to provide informed consent

Treatment and study plan

VRPA

Behavioral

Effects of virtual reality physical activity on outcomes

Treadmill

Behavioral

Effects of treadmill walking with music on outcomes

Control

Behavioral

Effects of music while sitting on outcomes

Primary outcomes

  1. Pace of participant recruitment

    Time frame: Up to 24 months

    enrollment rate of 6 participants per month

  2. Number of participants willing to continue using the assigned exercie modality

    Time frame: Day 1

    Willingness to continue using the exercise modality to which the participants were assigned and self-report enjoyment from engaging in the assigned exercise.

  3. Percentage of participants who complete the required tasks in each condition

    Time frame: Day 1

    Are participants able to complete the required tasks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes in Heart Rate

    Time frame: Day 1

    Differences in heart rate from pre- to post session

  2. Self-reported measures of "flow" associated with the assigned conditions

    Time frame: Day 1

    Flow will be assessed using the Flow Short Scale (Rheinberg et al, 2003) that is comprised of 13 questions answered on a 7-point scale (1 = Not at all, 7 = very much). Scores can range from 13-91, with lower scores indicating less of a "flow state" or feelings of immersion in the assigned activity.

  3. Changes in affect

    Time frame: Day 1

    Using the Activation-Deactivation Checklist (Thayer et al., 1986), participants will rate 20 different adjectives on a 4-point scale (1= definitely feel, 2= feel slightly, 3= cannot decide, 4= definitely do not feel) before they engage in the assigned activity and after they engage in the assigned activity. Lower numbers will indicate higher endorsements of a particular feeling, but the primary outcome will examine any changes in pre- to post-activity ratings of the different affective states.

  4. Rate of percieved exertion

    Time frame: Day 1

    Borg's Rate of Perceived Exertion will be used to measure how participants rate their perceived exertion on a scale of 6 (no exertion at all) to 20 (maximal exertion) (Borg, 1982). The scale is anchored to the participant's subjective perception, with descriptors such as "extremely hard." Rate of perceived exertion will be evaluated post-activity only and will be compared across groups.

  5. Changes in Stroop Color and Word Test

    Time frame: Day 1

    The Stroop Color and Word Test (Golden et al, 2002) will be conducted pre- and post-assigned activities. Raw scores (e.g., reaction times, errors) will be calculated and changes in those scores from pre- to post-activity will be determined.

  6. Number of Calories Burned

    Time frame: Day 1

    Total number of calories burned during the assigned condition

  7. Number of Active Minutes

    Time frame: Day 1

    Total number of active minutes during the assigned condition

  8. Changes in Executive Functioning

    Time frame: Day 1

    The Trail Making Test (TMT) will be used to calculate changes in executive function (Arbuthnott & Frank, 2000; Kortte et al., 2002; Reitan, 1956). Participants will be required to draw lines connecting different scattered numbers (Part A) and scattered numbers and letters (Part B). If the test can not be completed in 5-minutes it will be stopped. The more errors a person makes, and the longer a person takes, indicate poorer outcomes for executive function and changes in this measure will be calculated from pre- to post-activity.

  9. Changes in Working Memory Capacity

    Time frame: Day 1

    The Backward Digits Span (BDT, Lamar et al., 2007) measures an individual's working memory capacity and is comprised of 21 trials where participants will need to recall 3, 4, and 5-digit spans. The more numbers a person can correctly recall the better their working memory. Changes in this measure, from pre- to post-activity, will be calculated

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Rowan University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Effects of Different Physical Activity Modalities on Physiological and Psychological Outcomes

Acronym: IVRTE

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Oct 8, 2025
Registry last updated
Jan 16, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.