Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03032653

Immediate Weight-Bearing Ankle Study

This single-centre historical control group comparative study will compare outcomes of surgically-treated rotational ankle fractures and the current routine practice of early protected weightbearing and range of motion with immediate unprotected weightbearing as tolerated and range of motion after ankle open reduction and internal fixation.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Royal Columbian Hospital / Fraser Health Authority

New Westminster, British Columbia, V3L 3M2, Canada

About this study

Ankle fractures are among the most common injuries, making up 9% of all fractures. Rotational ankle fractures are among the most common of all fractures, with an incidence averaging 4.2 per 1,000 individuals annually. These fractures range from minimal injuries amenable to non-surgical management to complex injuries with potential of long-term sequelae. Known risk factors for ankle fractures are age, body mass index and previous ankle fracture, with the highest incidence in elderly women.

Most ankle fractures are low-energy injuries which occur when the body rotates about a planted foot, whether it be during sports, normal gait, or otherwise. Stable ankle fractures are generally treated non-surgically, while unstable fractures are usually treated with surgical reduction and fixation, with indications previously well-described and published.

However, the post-operative management of such injuries is still controversial, with large variability between care providers. Protocols range from complete immobilization of the affected ankle and non-weightbearing to early range-of-motion (ROM) and weightbearing (WB). Studies have compared immobilization and non-WB to early ROM and WB but results have been mixed, with the most recent study demonstrating safety and advantages to protected WB and ROM at two weeks post-operatively versus non-WB and immobilization for six weeks.

The Investigators intend to expand on the studies above and propose a single-centre historical control group comparative study to compare outcomes of surgically-treated rotational ankle fractures and the current routine practice of early protected weightbearing and range of motion with immediate unprotected weightbearing as tolerated and range of motion after ankle open reduction and internal fixation.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • lateral malleolus fracture with talar shaft
  • vertical shear medial malleolus fracture without superior articular involvement
  • bimalleolar fracture
  • any ankle fracture with posterior malleolus fragment involving 25% or less of the articular surface on the lateral ankle radiograph
  • 43.B1 (pure split of distal tibia - but only if does not involve any of tibial plafond, i.e., only the vertical split of medial malleolus)
  • 44.A1 (Weber A)
  • 44.A2 (Bimalleolar)
  • 44.A3 (posterior malleolus involvement - but only if < 25% articular involvement on lateral x-ray)
  • 44-B1 (Isolated)
  • 44.B2 (with medial lesion)
  • 44.B3 (with medial lesion & Volkmann's #)
  • closed, Gustilo-Anderson Grade I or Grade II open fractures are included
  • willing and able to sign the consent
  • willing and able to follow the protocol and attend follow-up visits
  • able to read and understand English or have an interpreter available

Exclusion criteria

  • skeletal immaturity demonstrated radiographically by open physes
  • previous ipsilateral ankle surgery
  • bilateral ankle fractures
  • non ambulatory prior to injury
  • inability to comply with postoperative protocol (i.e., cognitive impairment)
  • medical comorbidity precluding surgery
  • poorly controlled diabetes (i.e. dense neuropathy / hx of ulcers / sensory deficit)
  • polytrauma patients (other injuries involving the ipsi/contralateral lower limbs, including the hip, that would interfere with mobilization/rehabilitation)
  • surgical date > 14 days (time of injury to OR)
  • Gustilo-Anderson grade III open fractures
  • tibial plafond fractures
  • active infection at the surgical site diagnosed clinically by the attending surgeon
  • any ankle fracture with posterior malleolus fragment involving more than 25% of the articular surface on the lateral ankle radiograph
  • any medial malleolus fracture involving the superior articular surface
  • any ankle fracture requiring syndesmosis fixation
  • any ankle fracture-dislocation
  • incarceration
  • likely problems, in the judgment of the investigator, with maintaining follow-up

Treatment and study plan

Late Rehabilitation

Other

Post-0p: Non weight-bearing and no range of motion for 2 weeks post treatment. 2 weeks: Splint removed, removable pre-fabricated walking boot applied. WB as tolerated with boot, range of motion out of boot.

6 weeks: Boot discontinued and full unrestricted and unprotected WB and ROM permitted 6 weeks:

Early rehabilitation

Other

Weightbearing and range of motion as tolerated within the limitations of participant's own comfort. Use of ambulatory aides of any kind is permitted as needed without restriction. No brace or splint of any kind is permitted

Primary outcomes

  1. Olerud and Molander Score

    Time frame: 6 weeks post treatment

    An assessment of symptoms after ankle fracture.

Secondary outcomes

  1. EQ-5D

    Time frame: 2, 6 and 12 weeks post treatment

    Health Related quality of life outcome measure using five dimensions: Mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression.

  2. WPAI:SHP Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem

    Time frame: 2, 6 and 12 weeks post treatment

    A questionnaire pertaining to the effect of the participant's ankle fracture on their ability to work and perform regular activities.

  3. Range of Motion

    Time frame: 2, 6 and 12 weeks post treatment

    Amount of ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion (measured in degrees) as determined by goniometer assessment, as well as total arc of ankle ROM (dorsiflexion+ plantarflexion). This will be measured on both ankles for comparison.

  4. Wound Healing

    Time frame: 2, 6 and 12 weeks post treatment

    Complications regarding the surgical wound, including but not limited to signs of infection or dehiscence.

  5. Fracture Healing

    Time frame: 2, 6 and 12 weeks post treatment

    Radiographic assessment to determine healing, loss of reduction, loss of hardware fixation, or ankle alignment.

  6. Need for Re-operation

    Time frame: 2, 6 and 12 weeks post treatment

    Any issue, whether it be a wound complication or fracture complication, requiring re-operation.

  7. Time to Return to Work

    Time frame: 2, 6 and 12 weeks post treatment

    The chronological time between the date of surgery to the first day the participant returned to occupational duties, if currently employed and returns to work within the 12 weeks postoperative follow-up period. For the purposes of this study, students enrolled in educational activities will have their schooling treated as their occupational duty.

  8. Radiographic assessment

    Time frame: 2, 6 and 12 weeks post treatment

    Assessment of alignment, hardware fixation, fracture reduction and loss of reduction (defined as any shft of 2mm or more in fracture position)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Fraser Orthopaedic Research Society

Network

Registry information

Official study title

Immediate Unprotected Weight-Bearing and Range of Motion After Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Unstable Ankle Fractures. A Historical Control Group Comparative Study

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Jan 26, 2017
Registry last updated
Apr 23, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.