Saint-Joseph University
Beirut, 1104 2020, Lebanon
NCT Number: NCT04346706
The purpose of this prospective clinical study was to compare in delayed and immediately placed implants, the marginal vertical bone loss at 4 sides of the implant (buccal, palatal, mesial and distal), as well as the buccal and palatal bone thickness reduction at 3 months after loading.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Beirut, 1104 2020, Lebanon
Twenty-four patients were consecutively selected and enrolled in this study based on the aforementioned exclusion and inclusion criteria. Clinical examination was done by a different clinician than the operator, and according to the treatment indication, patients were allocated to the delayed implant placement group (Control), or the immediate implant placement group (Test). Thus, 15 implants were placed in healed extraction sites and immediately temporized (Control group), and 15 implants were placed in immediate extraction sites with immediate temporization (Test group).
Provisional acrylic crowns were prepared. All patients were placed on a prophylactic antibiotic regimen, starting one day prior to surgery as they were asked to take amoxicillin 500 mg; three times a day for 10 days or clindamycin 300 mg twice daily for 10 days for penicillin-allergic patients.
For the test group, tooth extractions were carried out atraumatically using periotomes. In both groups, the implant site preparation was completed in compliance with the general surgical principles and protocols defined by the manufacturer and screw-shaped implants (UFII, DIO™) were inserted at no less than 35 Ncm.
Temporary abutments were connected to the implants and torqued at 20 Ncm, and then temporary crowns were cemented on top of the abutments after checking and reducing occlusion to non-existent in both centric and lateral excursions.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The surgical procedure was conducted under local anesthesia. Intrasulcular incisions were performed around the mesial and distal tooth to the implant recipient site. Buccal and palatal mucoperiosteal flaps were elevated. Tooth extractions were carried out atraumatically using periotomes. Implant site preparation was completed in compliance with the general surgical principles and protocols defined by the manufacturer and screw-shaped implants (UFII, DIO™) were inserted at no less than 35 Ncm. Final insertion torque (IT) was measured and recorded using a manual hand wrench (DIO™). Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) was performed using an Osstell device (Sävedalen, Sweden). For each implant, three Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) readings were recorded by the same operator to calculate the mean ISQ, at implant placement (T0) and 3 months after implant insertion (T3) prior to final abutment torque and crown cementation.
Absorbable interrupted 4.0 sutures were used for flap closure.
The surgical procedure was conducted under local anesthesia. Intrasulcular incisions were performed around the mesial and distal tooth to the implant recipient site. Buccal and palatal mucoperiosteal flaps were elevated, the implant site preparation was completed in compliance with the general surgical principles and protocols defined by the manufacturer and screw-shaped implants (UFII, DIO™) were inserted at no less than 35 Ncm. Final insertion torque (IT) was measured and recorded using a manual hand wrench (DIO™). Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) was performed using an Osstell device (Sävedalen, Sweden). For each implant, three Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) readings were recorded by the same operator to calculate the mean ISQ. This was done at implant placement (T0) and 3 months after implant insertion (T3) prior to final abutment torque and crown cementation.
Absorbable interrupted 4.0 sutures were used for flap closure.
Time frame: Following procedure at day 0 (implant insertion) and 6 months (post-implantation)
Marginal vertical bone level changes at 4 sides of the implant (buccal, palatal, mesial and distal) on Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) images
Time frame: Following procedure at day 0 (implant insertion) and 6 months (post-implantation)
Buccal and palatal bone thickness at 4 levels : 0 mm, 2 mm, 4 mm and 6 mm from the implant platform on CBCT images
Time frame: Following procedure at day 0 (implant insertion) and 3 months (post-implantation)
Measurements of implant stability quotient (ISQ) following implant insertion
Time frame: Following procedure at day 0 (implant insertion)
Insertion torque value at implant placement
Saint-Joseph University
Other
Radiographic Evaluation of Marginal Bone Level, Buccal and Palatal Plate Thickness Alteration, and Implant Stability After Placement in Healed Ridges and Fresh Extraction Sockets: A 6 Months Prospective Study.
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07461324
Alveolar Osteitis, Apical Surgery
Copenhagen, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT07725029
Tooth Extraction
Al Mansurah, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07664917
Education, OSCE (Objective Structured Clinical Examination)
Kirikkale, Yahşihan, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07240493
Alveolar Ridge Resorption After Extraction, Mouth Diseases
Baghdad, Baghdad Governorate, Iraq
View Trial Details