Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02403466

IIPE-PRIS Accelerating Safe Signouts

Because communication and handoff failures are a root cause of two-thirds of "sentinel events"- serious, often fatal preventable adverse events in hospitals improving handoffs has been identified by AHRQ and the Joint Commission as a priority in nationwide efforts to improve patient safety. Comparative Effectiveness Research on handoff tools and processes has identified specific strategies to improve handoffs and reduce medical errors: 1) team training; 2) verbal mnemonics; and 3) use of written/computerized tools to supplement verbal sign-outs. To accelerate residents' use of CER-based handoff practices and improve patient safety, the investigators are implementing the three inventions above as a Resident Handoff Bundle (RHB) in eight pediatric hospitals in the United States and Canada.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Loading trial locations.

About this study

The I-PASS Study was initiated in response to mounting evidence that communication and handoff failures are a root cause of two-thirds of "sentinel events" - serious, often fatal, preventable adverse events in hospitals. The Agency on Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and Joint Commission have identified improving handoffs in care as a priority in nationwide efforts to improve patient safety. Research on handoff tools and processes has identified team training, introduction of verbal mnemonics, and use of written or computerized tools as strategies to improve handoffs and reduce medical errors. This study was designed to evaluate the effect of a resident handoff bundle (RHB) comprised of these three strategies in addressing medical errors, verbal and written miscommunications, and resident workflow and satisfaction.

The US Department of Health and Human Services granted $3 million in funding, with additional support provided by member institutional and private foundations. A total of nine hospitals in the United States and Canada will serve as data collection sites for the study (see list below). Staggered six-month waves of baseline data collection of medical errors and resident workflow, satisfaction, and miscommunications began in January 2010. Each site has a six-month wash-in period to implement the RHB intervention before embarking upon an additional six months of post-intervention data collection. Analysis and dissemination will begin upon completion of data collection at the last wave of sites in April 2013.

Study Sites:

Children's Hospital Boston (Boston, MA) - Coordinating Site Brigham and Women's Hospital (Boston, MA) - Data Coordinating Center

Lucile Packard Children's Hospital (Palo Alto, CA) UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital (San Francisco, CA) OHSU Doernbecher Children's Hospital (Portland, OR) Primary Children's Medical Center (Salt Lake City, UT) St. Louis Children's Hospital (St. Louis, MO) Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (Cincinnati, OH) Hospital for Sick Children (Toronto, ON) National Capital Consortium (Washington, DC) St. Christopher's Hospital for Children (Philadelphia, PA)

Study Leadership:

Principal Investigator: Christopher Landrigan, MD, MPH Project Leader: Amy Starmer, MD, MPH

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • The study will also include direct observation of house staff residents on the medical service. While implementation of the RHB itself is a QI protocol, the observation and collection of data from residents is research. We will therefore obtain informed consent from residents for participation in the research related to the effects on their care processes and experiences of implementation of the RHB. Participation will be voluntary.
  • All resident physicians rotating through study teams during the two 6 month periods of data collection will be included in the study if informed consent is granted. No resident physicians will be excluded on the basis of age, gender, ethnicity, race, or other demographic features. We anticipate enrolling a maximum of 70 resident physicians per site. This number may be significantly less due to the fact that certain residents may rotate through data collection study units more than once during the study period.

Exclusion criteria

  • The only exclusion criteria will be residents who do not rotate through study units during the data collection periods

Treatment and study plan

Resident Handoff Bundle

Behavioral
  • team training, 2) verbal mnemonics, and 3) standardization of written/computerized handoff tools

Primary outcomes

  1. Rates of serious medical errors

    Time frame: Continuous collection during data collection phase of study (total of 12 months over an 18 month period matched by time of year (i.e., 6 months pre, 6 months wash-in with no data collection, 6 months post-intervention data collection)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Verbal and written miscommunications

    Time frame: up to 28 months

    Residents will be assessed for 1 month periods at a time, both before and after implementing the intervention. This information will be collected in staggered 18-month intervals across all study sites over the course of a 28 month period.

  2. Time spent by residents gathering and signing out data

    Time frame: up to 28 months

    Residents will be assessed for 1 month periods at a time, both before and after implementing the intervention. This information will be collected in staggered 18-month intervals across all study sites over the course of a 28 month period.

  3. Resident satisfaction with sign-out

    Time frame: up to 28 months

    Residents will be assessed for 1 month periods at a time, both before and after implementing the intervention. This information will be collected in staggered 18-month intervals across all study sites over the course of a 28 month period.

  4. Hospital- and patient-level predictors of implementation success

    Time frame: up to 28 months

    analysis of all outcomes above, cross-referenced with hospital indicator codes and patient severity of illness codes

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Boston Children's Hospital

Other

Collaborators

  • Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
  • Lucile Packard Children's Hospital
  • OHSU Doernbecher Children's Hospital
  • Primary Children's Hospital
  • St. Christopher's Hospital for Children
  • St. Louis Children's Hospital
  • The Hospital for Sick Children
  • University of California, San Francisco
  • Walter Reed National Military Medical Center

Registry information

Official study title

Bundling Effective Resident Handoff Tools to Improve Patient Safety: A Multi-Center Pediatric Residency Quality Improvement Initiative

Acronym: I-PASS

Important dates

Study start
2010
Primary completion
2013
Study completion
2013
First posted
Mar 31, 2015
Registry last updated
Mar 31, 2015

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.