Merve Tarhan
Istanbul, 34810, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT07698327
Objective:
This study aims to investigate the effects of "team-based simulation" on the development of communication skills, self-awareness levels, and teamwork competencies among first-year nursing students.
Hypotheses:
H1: Team-based simulation training significantly increases the self-awareness levels of nursing students compared to individual-based training.
H2: Team-based simulation practices lead to a statistically significant improvement in students' attitudes toward teamwork, specifically regarding mutual support and team structure.
H3: Students who participate in team-based simulations demonstrate higher levels of satisfaction with learning and self-confidence compared to those in individual-based settings.
Study Description:
The research was conducted with 112 first-year nursing students using a randomized controlled and "cross-over" design. Participants were divided into two groups, experiencing both team-based and individual-based simulation applications in different sequences. Data were collected at four different time points-pre-test, intra-post-simulation, and one-month follow-up-using various scales. The study determined that team-based simulation lays the groundwork for the development of students' self-awareness, enhances teamwork skills, and increases satisfaction levels. To ensure the sustainability of these gains, it is recommended that such interactive and repetitive simulation methods be systematically integrated into nursing education curricula.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeAll sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Istanbul, 34810, Turkey (Türkiye)
This study utilizes a randomized, cross-over experimental design to evaluate the efficacy of team-based simulation versus individual-based simulation in nursing education. By employing a cross-over methodology, each participant serves as their own control, which minimizes inter-individual variability and enhances the statistical power of the analysis despite the sample size of 112 students.
The protocol involves a systematic delivery of clinical scenarios focused on fundamental nursing skills. In the team-based arm, participants are organized into groups of four, with designated roles such as team leader, medication administrator, primary caregiver, and documenter, which rotate to ensure comprehensive experience. The individual-based arm requires students to navigate the same clinical scenarios independently, focusing on autonomous decision-making and task prioritization without peer interaction.
The intervention is structured in three distinct phases:
Pre-intervention baseline assessment: Standardized measurement of participants' baseline self-awareness, communication traits, and existing teamwork perceptions.
Active simulation phase: Implementation of high-fidelity clinical simulations followed by immediate structured debriefing sessions. The debriefing component is grounded in reflective practice models to facilitate the transition of experiential learning into clinical competence.
Washout and cross-over period: A predetermined temporal interval to mitigate potential carry-over effects before participants switch experimental arms.
Data collection utilizes multi-dimensional psychometric instruments administered at four specific intervals: baseline, immediately post-first simulation, post-second simulation (crossover point), and a one-month follow-up. This longitudinal approach is specifically designed to evaluate the retention of skill acquisition and the durability of changes in self-awareness and team-based attitudes over time. The analysis will compare mean scores across these time points using repeated-measures ANOVA to determine the interaction effect between the teaching method and time, providing insight into the sustained impact of team-based learning environments.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The team-based simulation intervention is designed to foster collaborative clinical reasoning and interprofessional communication. Students are organized into four-member teams, with specific roles-team leader, medication administrator, primary caregiver, and documentation assistant-assigned to ensure structured task delegation. The intervention emphasizes collective decision-making, mutual support, and the utilization of team structure to navigate high-fidelity clinical scenarios. Each simulation is immediately followed by a structured, video-assisted debriefing process conducted in a group format. This session focuses on the "team process" and communication dynamics, encouraging students to analyze their interaction patterns and the impact of collective effort on patient outcomes. The intervention is delivered in an accredited nursing skill laboratory, ensuring standardized conditions across all group sessions.
The individual-based simulation intervention focuses on the cultivation of autonomous clinical judgment and the mastery of independent psychomotor skills. Each student navigates the clinical scenarios independently, assuming full responsibility for the entire clinical process, including assessment, decision-making, and task implementation, without the benefit of peer collaboration. This arm requires students to independently manage time and prioritize nursing interventions within the simulation environment. The subsequent debriefing process is tailored to the individual, focusing on personalized reflection, clinical reasoning errors, and technical skill refinement. Like the team-based sessions, these activities are conducted in an accredited skill laboratory using the same clinical scenarios to ensure that the educational content remains equivalent, allowing for a precise evaluation of the teaching methodology's impact on individual performance.
Time frame: Measured at baseline (pre-intervention), within 24 hours post-first simulation, within 24 hours post-second simulation (cross-over point), and at 1-month follow-up post-second simulation
The metric is the mean change in scores on the Teamwork Attitudes Scale, which evaluates key domains including mutual support, team structure, and leadership dynamics within the clinical simulation environment. Total scores on this scale range from 28 to 140, where higher scores indicate a better outcome (higher teamwork attitudes)
Time frame: Measured at baseline (pre-intervention), within 24 hours post-first simulation, within 24 hours post-second simulation (cross-over point), and at 1-month follow-up post-second simulation
The metric is the change in mean scores on the validated Self-Awareness Scale. This scale assesses the students' ability to recognize their own clinical decision-making processes, emotional responses, and professional behaviors during simulation scenarios. Total scores on this scale range from 0 to 75, where higher scores indicate a better outcome (higher self-awareness)
Time frame: Measured at baseline (pre-intervention), within 24 hours post-first simulation, within 24 hours post-second simulation (cross-over point), and at 1-month follow-up post-second simulation
The metric is the mean change in scores obtained from a standardized clinical communication assessment rubric. This tool evaluates the clarity, accuracy, and efficiency of information exchange between students and simulated patients or team members. Total scores on this scale range from 25 to 125, where higher scores indicate a better outcome (higher communication skills)
Istanbul Medipol University Hospital
Other
The Effect Of Team-Based Sımulatıon On Developıng Communıcatıon, Self-Awareness, And Teamwork Skılls Of Nursıng Students: A Randomızed Controlled Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06733207
Clinical Competence, Comparative Effectiveness Research
Reims, France
View Trial DetailsNCT00129064
Behavior, Communication
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04488523
Behavior, Communication
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07722520
Behavior, Communication
Cairo, Abbasya, Egypt
View Trial Details