Azacitidine
DrugGiven IV or SC
Other names: 5 AZC, 5-AC, 5-Azacytidine, 5-AZC, Azacytidine, Azacytidine, 5-, Ladakamycin, Mylosar, Onureg, U-18496, Vidaza
NCT Number: NCT05401097
This phase II study compares the order of treatment with ivosidenib or enasidenib and azacitidine plus venetoclax in treating older patients with acute myeloid leukemia with genetic changes in the IDH1 or IDH2 genes (IDH mutated). Ivosidenib is in a class of medications called isocitrate dehydrogenase-1 (IDH1) inhibitors. It works by slowing or stopping the growth of cancer cells. Enasidenib is in a class of medications called an IDH2 inhibitor. It also works by slowing or stopping the growth of cancer cells. Venetoclax is in a class of medications called B-cell lymphoma-2 (BCL-2) inhibitors. It may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking Bcl-2, a protein needed for cancer cell survival. Azacitidine is in a class of medications called demethylation agents. It works by helping the bone marrow to produce normal blood cells and by killing abnormal cells. This study may help researchers determine which treatment order is best for older patients with IDH mutated acute myeloid leukemia: 1) ivosidenib or enasidenib followed by azacitidine plus venetoclax; or 2) azacitidine plus venetoclax followed by ivosidenib or enasidenib.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, United States
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
I. To compare overall treatment failure at 24 months in newly diagnosed IDH1 or IDH2 mutated AML patients ≥18 years who are not candidates for intensive induction chemotherapy randomized to either sequential treatment with an IDH inhibitor in combination with azacitidine followed by venetoclax in combination with azacitidine (Arm A) or sequential treatment with venetoclax in combination with azacitidine followed by an IDH inhibitor in combination with azacitidine (Arm B).
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To compare overall survival at 24 months between patients treated on the two sequential treatment arms.
II. To compare time to overall treatment failure and time-to-event overall survival between patients treated on the two sequential treatment arms.
III. To determine the degree of response and compare complete remission (CR) rates, CR/complete remission with hematologic improvement (CRh)/complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) rates, and overall response rates (CR/CRh/CRi/morphologic leukemia free state [MLFS]) for first-line therapy and second-line therapy between patients treated on the two sequential treatment arms.
IV. To compare the duration of response (CR/CRh/CRi) to first-line therapy and second-line therapy between patients treated on the two sequential treatment arms.
V. To determine toxicity profiles for patients treated on the two sequential treatment arms, overall and by first-line treatment and by second-line treatment.
VI. To determine causes that would not allow patients that first line treatment fails to go on to second line treatment.
VII. To determine the number and proportion of patients who are able to go onto allogeneic transplantation in both treatment arms.
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:
I. To assess the clonal, biochemical and differentiation changes in AML cells during IDH-inhibitor and venetoclax treatment using flow cytometry and serial next generation sequencing on bone marrow specimens before and during treatment to assess for potential resistance mutations or clonal evolution that may be predictors of relapse.
II. To examine molecular properties of AML cells associated with primary and secondary resistance to each treatment arm to determine if particular subtypes of AML may be more or less likely to respond to a certain treatment modality.
III. To perform minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring via liquid biopsy via our custom-designed 30-gene mutation ArcherPlex panel to monitor clonal dynamics during both sequential treatment arms.
IV. To determine the feasibility of longitudinal sociodemographic and social determinants of health (SDOH) data collection for adults with AML on a clinical trial.
V. To determine the acceptability of longitudinal sociodemographic/SDOH data collection for adults with AML on a clinical trial.
VI. To describe changes in SDOH for adults with AML on a clinical trial. VII. To describe associations between SDOH measures and trial outcomes for adults with AML on a clinical trial.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized into 1 of 2 arms.
ARM A: For IDH1 mutated AML patients randomized to first-line therapy with IDHi+aza, patients will receive Ivosidenib 500mg po orally daily on Days 1-28 of each 28 day cycle. For IDH2 mutated AML patients randomized to first-line therapy with IDHi+aza, patients will receive Enasidenib 100mg po orally daily on Days 1-28 of each 28 day cycle. Azacitidine will be given to both groups intravenously or subcutaneously at 75mg/m2 daily on days 1-7, or 1-5/8-9, or days 1-4/7-9 of each 28 day cycle. Subsequent cycles after CR/CRi/CRh/MLFS achievement may be adjusted in timing and dosing.
ARM B: For both IDH1 and IDH2 mutated AML patient randomized to first-line therapy with Ven+aza, patients will receive venetoclax dosing with the ramp-up and dosing per the FDA-label (based off of concurrent drug interactions). Azacitidine will be given intravenously at 75mg/m2 daily on days 1-7, or 1-5/8-9, or days 1-4/7-9 of each 28-day cycle. Subsequent cycles after CR/CRi/CRh/MLFS achievement may be adjusted in timing and dosing.
After completion of the study treatment, patients are followed up at 30 days and then every 3 months for 5 years from registration, until death, or withdrawal of consent from study assessments and all further follow-up.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
The following methods are acceptable methods of contraception for the purpose of this study:
Exclusion criteria
Given IV or SC
Other names: 5 AZC, 5-AC, 5-Azacytidine, 5-AZC, Azacytidine, Azacytidine, 5-, Ladakamycin, Mylosar, Onureg, U-18496, Vidaza
Undergo biopsy of the bone marrow
Other names: BIOPSY_TYPE, Bx
Given PO
Other names: AG-221, CC-90007 Free Base
Given PO
Other names: AG-120, Tibsovo
Given PO
Other names: ABT-0199, ABT-199, ABT199, GDC-0199, RG7601, Venclexta, Venclyxto
Time frame: At 12 months from date of randomization
Defined as: 1) second occurrence of any of disease progression, relapse, failure to achieve complete remission (CR)/complete remission with hematologic improvement (CRh)/complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi), or 2) death from any cause. Within each treatment sequence, overall treatment failure rate will be defined as the number of patients with events divided by the number of eligible patients randomized. Patients who go to transplant will be considered a treatment success for a particular treatment sequence. All randomized patients meeting the eligibility criteria will be evaluable for treatment failure status by intention to treat. Will be analyzed using a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test, testing for a difference in proportions and stratifying on isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation status.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Will use a two-sided Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test, stratifying on IDH mutation status.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Will be summarized using the Kaplan-Meier method and will be compared between arms using a stratified log-rank test (stratified on IDH mutation status).
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Will be summarized using the Kaplan-Meier method and will be compared between arms using a stratified log-rank test (stratified on IDH mutation status).
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Molly Brandenburg
CONTACT
The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
CONTACT
Alice Mims
Other
Randomized, Sequential, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of IDH Targeted/Non- Targeted Versus Non-targeted/IDH-targeted Approaches in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed IDH Mutated AML Patients Not Candidates for Intensive Induction Therapy (I- DATA Study)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05554406
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06317649
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Hematologic Diseases
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07306832
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Disease Attributes
Palo Alto, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06672146
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Hematologic Diseases
Tucson, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details