Biospecimen Collection
ProcedureUndergo blood sample collection
Other names: Biological Sample Collection, Biospecimen Collected, Sample Collection, Specimen Collection
NCT Number: NCT06672146
This phase II MyeloMATCH treatment trial studies how well ASTX727 and venetoclax plus enasidenib works compared to ASTX727 and venetoclax alone for the treatment of older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or younger patients who are considered unfit for standard treatment, and who have an abnormal change (mutation) in the IDH2 gene. This gene mutation can cause AML to grow and spread. This trial is being done to see if adding enasidenib to the usual treatment can help more patients with the IDH2 gene get rid of AML.
ASTX727 is a fixed-dose formulation of two drugs, cedazuridine and decitabine. Cedazuridine is in a class of medications called cytidine deaminase inhibitors. It prevents the breakdown of decitabine, making it more available in the body so that decitabine will have a greater effect. Decitabine is in a class of medications called hypomethylation agents. It works by helping the bone marrow produce normal blood cells and by killing abnormal cells in the bone marrow. Venetoclax is in a class of medications called B-cell lymphoma-2 (BCL-2) inhibitors. It may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking Bcl-2, a protein needed for cancer cell survival. Enasidenib works by stopping the growth and spread of tumor cells that have the IDH2 mutation. Giving ASTX727 and venetoclax plus enasidenib may work better in treating AML patients with the IDH2 mutation.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Centro Comprensivo de Cancer de UPR, San Juan, Puerto Rico
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To evaluate the safety of decitabine and cedazuridine (ASTX727) + venetoclax + enasidenib (Arm 2) before initiating randomization.
II. To compare the rate of measurable residual disease (MRD) negative complete remission (CR) based on multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) after two cycles of treatment in older adults (or unfit adults age 18 or older) with IDH2 mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) who receive ASTX727, venetoclax, and enasidenib versus ASTX727 and venetoclax alone.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To estimate the composite remission rate (CR + complete remission with incomplete count recovery [CRi] + complete remission with partial hematologic recovery [CRh]), relapse-free survival (RFS), event-free survival (EFS), duration of response (DOR), and overall survival (OS) of participants by treatment arm.
II. To estimate IDH2 mutated variant allele frequency, flow cytometry MRD, and molecular MRD after two cycles of therapy in participants' bone marrow aspirates and blood by treatment arm.
III. To estimate remission rates (CR with and without MRD [MFC and molecular MRD], CRh and CRi), and to estimate the rates of hematologic improvement by treatment arm.
IV. To estimate the frequency and severity of adverse events by treatment arm. V. To evaluate the association between MFC and molecular MRD after two cycles of protocol treatment with the outcomes RFS and OS (landmarked by date of MRD measurement) by treatment arm.
BANKING OBJECTIVE:
I. To bank specimens for future correlative studies.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM 1: Patients receive ASTX727 orally (PO) once daily (QD) on days 1-5 and venetoclax PO QD on days 1-28 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
ARM 2: Patients receive ASTX727 PO QD on days 1-5, venetoclax PO QD on days 1-28, and enasidenib PO QD on days 1-28 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
All patients undergo blood sample collection, bone marrow aspiration, and bone marrow biopsy throughout the trial.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every month for the first year, every 2 months for the second year, every 3 months for the third year, and every 6 months until 5 years after registration or death.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Undergo blood sample collection
Other names: Biological Sample Collection, Biospecimen Collected, Sample Collection, Specimen Collection
Undergo bone marrow aspiration
Undergo bone marrow biopsy
Other names: Biopsy of Bone Marrow, Biopsy, Bone Marrow
Given PO
Other names: ASTX 727, ASTX-727, ASTX727, C-DEC, CDA Inhibitor E7727/Decitabine Combination Agent ASTX727, Cedazuridine/Decitabine Combination Agent ASTX727, Cedazuridine/Decitabine Tablet, DEC-C, Inaqovi, Inqovi
Given PO
Other names: AG 221, AG-221, AG221, CC-90007 Free Base
Given PO
Other names: ABT 199, ABT-0199, ABT-199, ABT199, GDC 0199, GDC-0199, GDC0199, RG7601, Venclexta, Venclyxto
Time frame: Baseline to 5 years
A randomized design will be used to compare binary endpoints in two arms with a single interim futility analysis. For the final analysis, a 2-sample proportion z-test will be used to compare the MRDneg-CR rates between arms with a two-sided alpha of 20%.
Time frame: Baseline to 5 years
Survival endpoints will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between arms using the log-rank test. Landmark survival endpoints after 2- and 4-cycles of therapy will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Time-dependent Cox regression models with response as a time-dependent covariate will be fit. Landmark Kaplan-Meier plots will be used describe marker associations with overall survival (OS) and RFS. Landmark and time-dependent Cox regression models will be fit with marker values as covariates. If endpoints subject to competing risks are analyzed, non-parametric cumulative incidence rates will be calculated, and associations will be evaluated using cause-specific hazard models
Time frame: Baseline to 5 years
Survival endpoints will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between arms using the log-rank test. Landmark survival endpoints after 2- and 4-cycles of therapy will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Time-dependent Cox regression models with response as a time-dependent covariate will be fit. Molecular and flow MRD rates in the peripheral blood will be tabulated and summarized by arm. Landmark and time-dependent Cox regression models will be fit with marker values as covariates. If endpoints subject to competing risks are analyzed, non-parametric cumulative incidence rates will be calculated, and associations will be evaluated using cause-specific hazard models
Time frame: Baseline to 5 years
Response and toxicity rates will be tabulated. Survival endpoints will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between arms using the log-rank test. Landmark survival endpoints after 2- and 4-cycles of therapy will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Time-dependent Cox regression models with response as a time-dependent covariate will be fit. Landmark and time-dependent Cox regression models will be fit with marker values as covariates. If endpoints subject to competing risks are analyzed, non-parametric cumulative incidence rates will be calculated, and associations will be evaluated using cause-specific hazard models
Time frame: Baseline to 5 years
Survival endpoints will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between arms using the log-rank test. Landmark survival endpoints after 2- and 4-cycles of therapy will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Time-dependent Cox regression models with response as a time-dependent covariate will be fit. Molecular and flow MRD rates in the peripheral blood will be tabulated and summarized by arm. Landmark Kaplan-Meier plots will be used describe marker associations with OS and RFS. Landmark and time-dependent Cox regression models will be fit with marker values as covariates. If endpoints subject to competing risks are analyzed, non-parametric cumulative incidence rates will be calculated, and associations will be evaluated using cause-specific hazard models
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Nih
A Randomized Phase II Trial of ASTX727 and Venetoclax Compared With ASTX727, Venetoclax, and Enasidenib for Newly Diagnosed Older Adults With IDH2 Mutant Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A MyeloMATCH Substudy
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07548710
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Hematologic Diseases
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05564390
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06529731
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Bone Marrow Diseases
St Louis, Missouri, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07020533
Accelerated Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, BCR-ABL1 Positive, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Duarte, California, United States
View Trial Details