The Second People's Hospital of Neijiang City
Neijiang, Sichuan, 641000, China
NCT Number: NCT06581497
Immunotherapy has become the main treatment recommendation for HCC. MWA treatment induces peripheral immune response, which may enhance the effectiveness of immunotherapy for advanced HCC. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of ICIs combined with MWA compared to ICIs alone.
The study will compare two groups: ICIs and ICIs+MWA. Main objectives: OS, PFS Secondary objectives: CR PR、SD、PD、ORR、DCR、AEs This study addresses the efficacy and safety of using ICIs in combination with MWA compared to ICIs alone for advanced HCC patients.
The investigators' study aims to evaluate the necessity of immunotherapy combined with targeted drugs or microwave ablation in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in the real world, providing relevant clinical data for the treatment selection of HCC patients.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me19 year–80 year
All sexes
Observational
Neijiang, Sichuan, 641000, China
Research Title: Comparing the Efficacy of ICIs with and without MWA in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Real Clinical Practice Background: Immunotherapy has become the main treatment recommendation for cancer. Ablation therapy induces peripheral immune response, which may enhance the effectiveness of immunotherapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
Main objectives: OS, PFS Secondary objectives: CR PR、SD、PD、ORR、DCR、AEs Research Design: This is a single center, retrospective cohort study. This study addresses the efficacy and safety of using ICIs in combination with MWA compared to ICIs alone for advanced HCC patients.
Meaning: The investigators' study aims to evaluate the necessity of immunotherapy combined with targeted drugs or microwave ablation in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in the real world, providing relevant clinical data for the treatment selection of HCC patients.
Innovation: The innovation of this paper lies in the first verification of the efficacy and safety of microwave ablation (MWA) combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients.
Expected results: The innovation of this paper lies in the first validation of the significant efficacy of microwave ablation (MWA) combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients, significantly improving overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS), as well as objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR).
Conclusion: The investigators' study aims to evaluate the necessity of immunotherapy combined with targeted drugs or microwave ablation in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in the real world, providing relevant clinical data for the treatment selection of HCC patients.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
ICIs mainly refer to PD-1 drug therapy, including pembrolizumab, camrizumab, toripalimab, tislelizumab, and sintilimab. The dosage and duration of ICIs comply with the manufacturer's guidelines.
ICIs mainly refer to PD-1 drug therapy, including pembrolizumab, camrizumab, toripalimab, tislelizumab, and sintilimab. The dosage and duration of ICIs comply with the manufacturer's guidelines. All patients, except for those enrolled in ICIs, should also undergo MWA treatment.
Time frame: Progression-Free Survival was assessed from the date of treatment initiation until the date of first documented disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first, assessed up to 24 months.
Time from treatment initiation to disease progression or death from any cause.
Time frame: Overall Survival was measured from the date of treatment initiation until death from any cause or patients who were still alive at the last follow-up were censored at that time point, assessed up to 36 months.
Time from treatment initiation to disease progression or death from any cause.
Time frame: Objective response rate was measured from baseline to 24 months, every 8 weeks or until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal from the study, whichever occurs first.
According to the mRECIST criteria, the proportion of patients who achieve complete response (CR) or partial response (PR).
The First People's Hospital of Neijiang
Other
Comparing the Efficacy of ICIs With and Without MWA in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Real-World Clinical Practice
Acronym: IMI-aHCC
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01387555
Adenocarcinoma, Carcinoma
La Jolla, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01356628
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Digestive System Diseases
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04172506
HCC, Lung Cancer
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
View Trial DetailsNCT04542837
HCC
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial Details