Nordsjaellands Hospital
Hillerød, 3400, Denmark
NCT Number: NCT04680169
This trial compares two different second generation supraglottic airway devices (AuraGain and I-gel) used as a conduit for bronchoscopic tracheal intubation during continuous oxygenation in order tο determine time to successful tracheal intubation and ease of use.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Hillerød, 3400, Denmark
A prospective randomized controlled trial in the Department of Anesthesiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Nordsjællands Hospital-Hillerød Denmark. The study is approved by the Ethics Committee, capital region of Denmark. The aim of the study is to compare bronchoscopic tracheal intubation during continuous oxygenation through the AuraGain and I-gel supraglottic airway device. One hundred patients will be randomly allocated into two groups, group A (AuraGain) and group B (I-gel). Study outcomes are time to tracheal intubation confirmed by capnography as well as anesthesiologists reports of ease of use. Twenty-five anesthesiologists participates in this study, and are allocated four patient each. In random order, each physician will perform two bronchoscopic tracheal intubations with each SGA.
In the preoperative setting, a complete anesthetic evaluation will be performed, including a detailed airway assessment determining predictors for difficulties of face mask ventilation, insertion of SGA and tracheal intubation. Participants are scheduled to undergo elective surgery under general anesthesia. Before induction, all patients will be preoxygenated with 100% oxygen. After induction, rocuronium 0.6mg/kg will be used to facilitate neuromuscular blockade. Sufficient face mask ventilation will be performed before intervention.
Group A: AuraGain:
Time is measured from when the anesthesiologist reaches for the AuraGain LMA until the mask is placed and adequate ventilation is confirmed by capnography. The AuraGain LMA will be used as conduit for bronchoscopic intubation during continuous oxygenation, and time is measured until placement of the tracheal tube verified by capnography.
Group B: I-gel:
Time is measured from when the anesthesiologist reaches for the I-gel LMA until the mask is placed and adequate ventilation is confirmed by capnography.The I-gel LMA will be used as conduit for bronchoscopic tracheal intubation during continuous oxygenation, and time is measured until placement of the tracheal tube verified by capnography.
In both groups (A and B) up to two attempts of SGA placement and up to three attempts of tracheal intubation are allowed.
In case of an emerging unpredicted difficult airway and a concurrent unsuccessful SGA placement, the difficult airway algorithm, DAS, UK will be followed. Video- assisted laryngoscopy will be the first option.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Comparing two different SGAs as conduit for bronchoscopic tracheal intubation
Comparing two different SGAs as conduit for bronchoscopic tracheal intubation
Time frame: Up to study completion, an average of 4 months
Total time from reaching the SGA with hands to ended bronchoscopic tracheal intubation confirmed by the end of first curve on capnography
Time frame: Up to study completion, an average of 4 months
Time measured from reaching SGA with hands to correct placement of SGA confirmed by end of first curve on capnography
Time frame: Up to study completion, an average of 4 months
time measured from confirmed placement of SGA until successful tracheal intubation confirmed by end of first curve on capnography
Time frame: Up to study completion, an average of 4 months
two attempts at correct placement allowed. Attempt is failed if no curve appears on capnography.
Time frame: Up to study completion, an average of 4 months
Attempt of bronchoscopic intubation begins when entering aScope in swivel. Attempt is failed if airway is not visualised, if tracheal tube can not be advanced in trachea, if SpO2 is <85% or if total time exceeds 6 minutes. Three attempts of intubation is allowed.
Time frame: Up to study completion, an average of 4 months
if failed (as described in outcome 4), reason of failure is described
Time frame: Up to study completion, an average of 4 months
Physician will be asked to report resistance as: none, mild, severe, impossible
Time frame: Up to study completion, an average of 4 months
Physician will be asked to report feasibility at a scale 1-10, 1=easy, 10=very difficult
Time frame: Up to study completion, an average of 4 months
Physician will be asked to report feasibility at a scale 1-10, 1=easy, 10=very difficult
Time frame: Up to study completion, an average of 4 months
Physician will be asked to report feasibility of the whole procedure at a scale 1-10, 1=easy, 10=very difficult
Time frame: Up to study completion, an average of 4 months
Class 1: Unable to see the vocal cords. Class 2: the vocal cords and the anterior aspect of the epiglottis are visualized. Class 3: the vocal cords and the posterior aspect of the epiglottis are observed. Grade 4: only vocal cords were observed.
Nordsjaellands Hospital
Other
I-gel Versus AuraGain for Bronchoscopic Intubation Through Supraglottic Airway Device - a Randomized Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06261619
Airway Management, Pathologic Processes
Providence, Rhode Island, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07681960
Airway Management, Asphyxia Neonatorum
Kahramanmaraş, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07678424
Airway Management, Clinical Competence
Kahramanmaraş, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07669259
Airway Management, Capnography
Antalya, konyaaltı, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details