Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT07678424

POV Video and Mental Practice Training for Neonatal LMA Insertion

This prospective, randomized, single-blind simulation study aims to evaluate and compare the educational efficacy of a hybrid instructional modality-combining point-of-view (POV) video training and structured mental practice (MP)-against standard instructor-led live demonstration for neonatal laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion training among novice healthcare professionals. Learning neonatal airway management skills presents unique educational and cognitive challenges, especially for non-physician providers who are frequently required to perform these high-stakes interventions during the Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) curricula.

A total of 52 eligible healthcare professionals (including physicians, midwives, nurses, paramedics, and emergency medical technicians) with no prior neonatal LMA insertion experience will be prospectively enrolled and randomly allocated into two equal parallel groups (n=26 per group). Group A (Control) will receive a standard, step-by-step 5-minute live instructor demonstration on a high-fidelity term neonatal simulator. Group B (Intervention) will view a 3-minute standardized POV video captured from a first-person perspective via a head-mounted action camera worn by an expert instructor, immediately followed by a 1-minute structured mental rehearsal, with no live demonstration provided.

Following the respective educational interventions, all participants will individually perform the neonatal LMA insertion on the simulator in a separate room. A trained evaluator, who remains strictly blinded to the group assignments, will record the performance outcomes. The primary outcome measures are the objective total OSCE score (evaluated via a 22-item standardized checklist) and the physical procedural completion time in seconds. Secondary outcomes include first-attempt success rates, critical error rates, instances of excessive force application, airway trauma or procedural failure, and subjective cognitive workload dimensions assessed via the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) questionnaire. The findings will provide insights into scalable, cost-effective, and cognitively optimized learning models for integration into neonatal resuscitation training frameworks.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University, Faculty of Medicine

Kahramanmaraş, 46100, Turkey (Türkiye)

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Being a licensed healthcare professional (physicians, midwives, nurses, paramedics, or emergency medical technicians) currently participating in or eligible for the Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) training.
  • Having no prior practical, clinical, or simulator-based experience with neonatal laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion.
  • Voluntarily consenting to participate in the study and complete all evaluation procedures (OSCE and NASA-TLX).

Exclusion criteria

  • Having previous hands-on experience or formal advanced training specifically in neonatal LMA stabilization or insertion.
  • Declining to participate or failing to complete any phase of the allocated educational intervention or subsequent assessment.
  • Having visual, auditory, or cognitive impairments that would interfere with viewing the point-of-view (POV) video or performing the structured mental practice.

Treatment and study plan

Standard Instructor Demonstration

Other

A 5-minute, step-by-step live instructor demonstration of neonatal LMA insertion on a simulator.

POV Video and Mental Practice

Other

A 3-minute first-person point-of-view video combined with 1 minute of structured mental rehearsal.

Primary outcomes

  1. Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) Score

    Time frame: Immediately after the educational intervention (Day 1).

    A 22-item standardized checklist specifically developed based on the Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) guidelines to evaluate the technical proficiency of neonatal laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion. Each step is scored, and higher total scores indicate superior clinical performance.

  2. Procedural Completion Time

    Time frame: Immediately after the educational intervention (Day 1).

    The total physical time measured in seconds from the moment the participant picks up the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) device until the successful placement and initial ventilation on the high-fidelity neonatal simulator.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Subjective Workload (NASA-TLX Score)

    Time frame: Immediately after the clinical performance assessment (Day 1).

    The NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) questionnaire will be used to evaluate the multidimensional subjective workload experienced by participants across 6 subscales: mental demand, physical demand, temporal demand, performance, effort, and frustration. Total score ranges from 0 to 100, where higher scores reflect higher cognitive and physical workload.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Combined Use of Point-of-View (POV) Video and Mental Practice Training Versus Standard Demonstration for Neonatal LMA Insertion by Novice Healthcare Professionals: A Prospective Randomized Simulation Study

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Jul 1, 2026
Registry last updated
Jul 1, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.