Conventionally-fractionated WPRT
RadiationTotal dose: 45 Gy in 25 fractions WPRT
NCT Number: NCT04197141
The purpose of this research study is to determine if 5 (five) fractions of external radiotherapy with higher radiation doses per fraction to the pelvis leads to similar results to the standard of care external radiotherapy treatment that is comprised of 25 fractions of external radiotherapy with lower radiation doses per fraction to the pelvis.
This study aims to investigate the impact in quality of life associated with hypofractionated Whole Pelvis Radiotherapy (WPRT) in comparison to conventionally-fractionated WPRT in patients with unfavorable-intermediate and high-risk prostate cancers. This information is valuable as hypofractionated WPRT is a more attractive and convenient treatment approach, and may become the new standard of care if proven to be well-tolerated and effective. Therefore, this study aims to provide a more rational justification for use of hypofractionated WPRT in future larger randomized trials by comparing this strategy with the current standard of care. This study will also provide an initial understanding of the toxicity profile and cancer control associated with hypofractionated WPRT and High Dose Rate Brachytherapy (HDR-BT).
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
18 year and older
Male
Interventional
Phase 2
Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Total dose: 45 Gy in 25 fractions WPRT
Total dose: 25 Gy in 5 fractions WPRT
Time frame: I year post treatment (approximately 3 years and 2 months)
Late bowel function as reported by the patient using the standardized questionnaire Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) sub-domain approximately 1 year after the end of treatment. The EPIC questionnaire contains 32 questions measuring patient function. Each question has a response option ranging from 0 or 1 (best) to 3, 4, or 5 (worst). The responses then correlate to a scoring scale of 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. The values vary from 0 to 100 for each question. The scores can then be added to come up with an overall quality of life score.
Time frame: 6 weeks post treatment (approximately 2 years and 3 months)
Acute urinary and sexual QOL as reported by the patient using the standardized questionnaire Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) urinary and sexual domains. The EPIC questionnaire contains 32 questions measuring patient function. Each question has a response option ranging from 0 or 1 (best) to 3, 4, or 5 (worst). The responses then correlate to a scoring scale of 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. The values vary from 0 to 100 for each question. The scores can then be added to come up with an overall quality of life score.
Time frame: 6 weeks post treatment (approximately 2 years and 3 months)
Acute bowel function as reported by the patient using the standardized questionnaire Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) approximately 6 weeks after the end of treatment. The EPIC questionnaire contains 32 questions measuring patient function. Each question has a response option ranging from 0 or 1 (best) to 3, 4, or 5 (worst). The responses then correlate to a scoring scale of 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. The values vary from 0 to 100 for each question. The scores can then be added to come up with an overall quality of life score.
Time frame: I year post treatment (approximately 3 years and 2 months)
Late bowel bother as reported by the patient using the standardized questionnaire Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) sub-domain approximately 1 year after the end of treatment. The EPIC questionnaire contains 32 questions measuring patient function. Each question has a response option ranging from 0 or 1 (best) to 3, 4, or 5 (worst). The responses then correlate to a scoring scale of 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. The values vary from 0 to 100 for each question. The scores can then be added to come up with an overall quality of life score.
Time frame: I year post treatment (approximately 3 years and 2 months)
Late urinary and sexual QOL as reported by the patient using the standardized questionnaire Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC). The EPIC questionnaire contains 32 questions measuring patient function. Each question has a response option ranging from 0 or 1 (best) to 3, 4, or 5 (worst). The responses then correlate to a scoring scale of 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. The values vary from 0 to 100 for each question. The scores can then be added to come up with an overall quality of life score.
Time frame: 6 weeks post treatment (approximately 2 years and 3 months), 1 year post treatment (approximately 3 years and 2 months) and 2 years post treatment (approximately 4 years and 2 months)
International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) as reported by the patient at 6 weeks, 1 year, and 2 years post treatment. The IPSS is a tool used for monitoring symptoms of prostate enlargement (benign prostatic hyperplasia). There are 7 questions related to urinary function. Responses are on a scale from 0 (best) to 5 (worst). Responses are added to come up with a total score, measuring if the patient is mildly symptomatic, moderately symptomatic, or severely symptomatic. There is 1 quality of life question related to urinary symptoms. Responses are on a scale from 0 (best) to 6 (worst).
Time frame: 6 weeks post treatment (approximately 2 years and 3 months), 1 year post treatment (approximately 3 years and 2 months) and 2 years post treatment (approximately 4 years and 2 months)
Urinary, bowel, and sexual toxicity will be measured by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4, at 6 weeks, 1 year, and 2 years post treatment.
Time frame: 4 years post treatment (approximately 6 years and 2 months)
PSA curve at 4 years post-treatment.
Time frame: 4 years post treatment (approximately 6 years and 2 months)
PSA nadir at 4 years post-treatment.
Time frame: End of study (approximately 7 years and 2 months)
Cost effectiveness analysis of the hypofractionated arm in comparison to the conventionally fractionated treatment arm.
Time frame: End of study (approximately 7 years and 2 months)
The time from randomization to death from any cause.
Time frame: End of study (approximately 7 years and 2 months)
The time from randomization to biochemical failure (based on the Phoenix definition) or death from any cause, whichever occurs first.
Time frame: End of study (approximately 7 years and 2 months)
The time from randomization to first local failure.
Time frame: End of study (approximately 7 years and 2 months)
The time from randomization to first regional failure.
Time frame: End of study (approximately 7 years and 2 months)
The time from randomization to start of salvage ADT, death or last follow-up.
Time frame: End of study (approximately 7 years and 2 months)
The time from randomization to development of metastasis, death or last follow-up.
Time frame: End of study (approximately 7 years and 2 months)
The time from randomization to death attributed to prostate cancer.
London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
Other
Is Hypofractionated Whole-Pelvis Radiotherapy (WPRT) as Well Tolerated as Conventionally-Fractionated WPRT in Prostate Cancer Patients? (HOPE-Trial)
Acronym: HOPE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06441994
Genital Diseases, Genital Diseases, Male
Suita, Osaka, Japan
View Trial DetailsNCT00352924
Blood Protein Disorders, Cardiovascular Diseases
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03957252
Disease, Genital Diseases
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04589468
Behavior, Breast Cancer
Duarte, California, United States
View Trial Details