Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00494507

Hyper- and Hypokalemic Periodic Paralysis Study

The purpose of this study is to compare Dichlorphenamide with placebo (an inactive substance) for prevention of episodes and for improvement of strength in hyperkalemic (HYP) and hypokalemic (HOP) periodic paralysis. This study will also look at the long-term effects of Dichlorphenamide in periodic paralysis.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

Periodic paralysis is a relatively rare, life-long disorder characterized by intermittent bouts of paralysis, progressive weakness, and diminished quality of life. Two drugs, acetazolamide (ACZ) and dichlorphenamide, have been prescribed to treat the disorder, however, dichlorphenamide is no longer available.

In this multi-center, parallel, randomized trial researchers will compare the effects of dichlorphenamide vs. placebo in patients with hyperkalemic (HYP) and hypokalemic (HOP) periodic paralysis.

The trial consists of two 9-week studies-one study will enroll persons with hyperkalemic periodic paralysis and the other study will enroll persons with hypokalemic periodic paralysis. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups: dichlorphenamide or placebo (an inactive substance). During the studies, participants will be asked to keep a daily diary to record the time, length, and severity of each episode of weakness (attack). The study coordinator will contact participants weekly to review the diary information.

The 9-week phase will be followed by a 1-year open-label dichlorphenamide extension without placebo to determine the long-term effects of dichlorphenamide on the course of the disease and on inter-attack weakness.

Duration of the trial for participants is approximately 65 weeks, including a screening phase to determine eligibility, the first 9-week treatment phase, and the one-year open-label extension phase.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Genetically definite, clinically definite or clinically probable Hyperkalemic or Hypokalemic Periodic Paralysis as outlined in the protocol
  • Male and female participants, age 18 and older who are able to comply with the study conditions.
  • Participants who have distinct regular episodes of weakness with an average frequency of > or = to 1 a week and < or = to 3 a day either on or off treatment, whichever is higher
  • Normal thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) level

Exclusion criteria

  • Evidence for Andersen-Tawil syndrome (any one of the following 3 criteria)
  • Prolonged QT interval or complex ventricular ectopy between attacks
  • Distinctive physical features (2 of the following 5)
  • Low set ears
  • Short stature
  • Hypo-/micrognathia
  • Clinodactyly
  • Hypo-/hypertelorism
  • KIR 2.1 gene mutation
  • Coincidental renal, hepatic, active thyroid disease, restrictive or obstructive lung disease, other neuromuscular disease, or heart disease
  • Chronic, non-congestive, angle-closure glaucoma
  • Use of any of the following medications for reasons other than treatment of periodic paralysis: diuretics, antiarrhythmics, corticosteroids, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, antiepileptics, magnesium
  • History of life-threatening episodes of respiratory muscle weakness or cardiac arrhythmias during attacks
  • Pregnancy
  • Known mutation in the alpha subunit of the sodium channel gene in hypokalemic periodic paralysis patients

Treatment and study plan

Dichlorphenamide (double-blind)

Drug

50mg tablet; maximum dosage 400mg/day

Other names: Daranide

Placebo (Double-Blind)

Drug

Inactive substance manufactured to look like Dichlorphenamide 50mg tablet

Dichlorphenamide (open-label)

Drug

50mg tablet; maximum dosage 400mg/day

Other names: Daranide

Primary outcomes

  1. HYP Attack Rate

    Time frame: 8 weeks

    The number of distinct attacks per week over the final 8 weeks (Weeks 2-9) of the double-blind treatment period as self-reported by HYP participants.

  2. HOP Attack Rate

    Time frame: 8 weeks

    The number of distinct attacks per week over the final 8 weeks (Weeks 2-9) of the double-blind treatment period as self-reported by HOP participants.

Secondary outcomes

  1. HYP Severity-weighted Attack Rate

    Time frame: 8 weeks

    HYP participant severity-weighted attack rate is defined as the sum of average attack severity across all distinct attacks over the final 8 weeks (Weeks 2-9) of the double-blind treatment period divided by the number of weeks that the subject was followed. Attack severity (scored as 1-10 with increasing severity) is self-reported.

  2. HOP Severity-weighted Attack Rate

    Time frame: 8 weeks

    HOP participant severity-weighted attack rate is defined as the sum of average attack severity across all distinct attacks over the final 8 weeks (Weeks 2-9) of the double-blind treatment period divided by the number of weeks that the subject was followed. Attack severity (scored as 1-10 with increasing severity) is self-reported.

  3. HYP Attack Duration

    Time frame: 8 weeks

    HYP participant total attack duration per week, defined as the sum of attack durations across all distinct attacks over the final 8 weeks (Weeks 2-9) of the double-blind treatment period divided by the number of weeks that the subject was followed.

  4. HOP Attack Duration

    Time frame: 8 weeks

    HOP participant total attack duration per week, defined as the sum of attack durations across all distinct attacks over the final 8 weeks (Weeks 2-9) of the double-blind treatment period divided by the number of weeks that the subject was followed.

  5. HYP Endpoint of Acute Worsening

    Time frame: 0-9 weeks

    Increase in attack frequency or severity in HYP participants necessitating withdrawal from the initial nine-week double-blind treatment period and moving directly into the open-label phase.

  6. HOP Endpoint of Acute Worsening

    Time frame: 0-9 weeks

    Increase in attack frequency or severity in HOP participants necessitating withdrawal from the initial nine-week double-blind treatment period and moving directly into the open-label phase.

  7. HYP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Average Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) Score

    Time frame: Baseline and 9 weeks

    The strength of each of 26 individual muscles was graded using a modified 13-point Medical Research Council scale ranging from 0-5. Recorded grades were converted to numerical values as follows prior to averaging across muscles to form a composite score: 0 = 0; 1 = 1; 2- = 1.67; 2 = 2; 2+ = 2.33; 3- = 2.67; 3 = 3; 3+ = 3.33; 4- = 3.67; 4 = 4; 4+ = 4.33; 5- = 4.67; 5 = 5. A higher score represents a better outcome, i.e. 5 = normal strength.

    The following muscles were tested: shoulder abductor (left/right), elbow extensor (left/right), elbow flexor (left/right), wrist extensor (left/right), wrist flexor (left/right), hip flexor (left/right), hip extensor (left/right), hip abductor (left/right), knee extensor (left/right), knee flexor (left/right), ankle dorsiflexor (left/right), ankle plantar flexor (left/right), neck extensor, neck flexor.

  8. HOP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Average Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) Score

    Time frame: Baseline and 9 weeks

    The strength of each of 26 individual muscles was graded using a modified 13-point Medical Research Council scale ranging from 0-5. Recorded grades were converted to numerical values as follows prior to averaging across muscles to form a composite score: 0 = 0; 1 = 1; 2- = 1.67; 2 = 2; 2+ = 2.33; 3- = 2.67; 3 = 3; 3+ = 3.33; 4- = 3.67; 4 = 4; 4+ = 4.33; 5- = 4.67; 5 = 5. A higher score represents a better outcome, i.e. 5 = normal strength.

    The following muscles were tested: shoulder abductor (left/right), elbow extensor (left/right), elbow flexor (left/right), wrist extensor (left/right), wrist flexor (left/right), hip flexor (left/right), hip extensor (left/right), hip abductor (left/right), knee extensor (left/right), knee flexor (left/right), ankle dorsiflexor (left/right), ankle plantar flexor (left/right), neck extensor, neck flexor.

  9. HYP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Average Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction Testing (MVICT) Scores

    Time frame: Baseline and 9 weeks

    The strength of each of 10 muscles was measured using quantitative myometry and expressed as the number of standard deviations from normal (Z-score) given the participant's age, gender, and height. The scores were averaged across muscles to form a composite MVICT score: average standardized MVICT score. A positive Z-score indicates a better outcome.

    The following muscles were tested: elbow extensor (left/right), elbow flexor (left/right), knee extensor (left/right), knee flexor (left/right), and hand grip (left/right).

  10. HOP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Average Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction Testing (MVICT) Scores

    Time frame: Baseline and 9 weeks

    The strength of each of 10 muscles was measured using quantitative myometry and expressed as the number of standard deviations from normal (Z-score) given the participant's age, gender, and height. The scores were averaged across muscles to form a composite MVICT score: average standardized MVICT score. A positive Z-score indicates a better outcome.

    The following muscles were tested: elbow extensor (left/right), elbow flexor (left/right), knee extensor (left/right), knee flexor (left/right), and hand grip (left/right).

  11. HYP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Average Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction Testing Percent of Predicted Normal

    Time frame: Baseline and 9 weeks

    The strength of each of 10 muscles was measured using quantitative myometry and expressed as the percent of predicted normal given the participant's age, gender, and height. The scores were averaged across muscles to form a composite MVICT score: average percent of predicted normal score. A higher number indicates a better outcome.

    The following muscles were tested: elbow extensor (left/right), elbow flexor (left/right), knee extensor (left/right), knee flexor (left/right), and hand grip (left/right).

  12. HOP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Average Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction Testing Percent of Predicted Normal

    Time frame: Baseline and 9 weeks

    The strength of each of 10 muscles was measured using quantitative myometry and expressed as the percent of predicted normal given the participant's age, gender, and height. The scores were averaged across muscles to form a composite MVICT score: average percent of predicted normal score. A higher number indicates a better outcome.

    The following muscles were tested: elbow extensor (left/right), elbow flexor (left/right), knee extensor (left/right), knee flexor (left/right), and hand grip (left/right).

  13. HYP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Lean Body Mass

    Time frame: Baseline and 9 weeks

    Lean body mass was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA).

  14. HOP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in Lean Body Mass

    Time frame: Baseline and 9 weeks

    Lean body mass was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA).

  15. HYP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in SF-36 Physical Component Summary Score

    Time frame: Baseline and 9 weeks

    The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36) questionnaire is a widely used profile measure of generic health-related quality of life. The 36 questions are allocated to eight scales: physical function (PF), physical role (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health perceptions (GH), vitality (VT), social function (SF), mental health (MH), and emotional role (RE). The physical component summary score is calculated from the four scales of PF, RP,BP, and GH. Scores are constructed as a T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 and no minimum or maximum score. Higher scores are associated with better quality of life.

  16. HOP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in SF-36 Physical Component Summary Score

    Time frame: Baseline and 9 weeks

    The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36) questionnaire is a widely used profile measure of generic health-related quality of life. The 36 questions are allocated to eight scales: physical function (PF), physical role (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health perceptions (GH), vitality (VT), social function (SF), mental health (MH), and emotional role (RE). The physical component summary score is calculated from the four scales of PF, RP, BP, and GH. Scores are constructed as a T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 and no minimum or maximum score. Higher scores are associated with better quality of life.

  17. HYP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in SF-36 Mental Health Component Summary Score

    Time frame: Baseline and 9 weeks

    The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36) questionnaire is a widely used profile measure of generic health-related quality of life. The 36 questions are allocated to eight scales: physical function (PF), physical role (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health perceptions (GH), vitality (VT), social function (SF), mental health (MH), and emotional role (RE). The mental health component summary score is calculated from the four scales of VT, SF, MH, and RE. Scores are constructed as a T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 and no minimum or maximum score. Higher scores are associated with better quality of life.

  18. HOP Change From Baseline to Week 9 in SF-36 Mental Health Component Summary Score

    Time frame: Baseline and 9 weeks

    The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36) questionnaire is a widely used profile measure of generic health-related quality of life. The 36 questions are allocated to eight scales: physical function (PF), physical role (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health perceptions (GH), vitality (VT), social function (SF), mental health (MH), and emotional role (RE). The mental health component summary score is calculated from the four scales of VT, SF, MH, and RE. Scores are constructed as a T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 and no minimum or maximum score. Higher scores are associated with better quality of life.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Rochester

Other

Collaborators

  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)

Registry information

Official study title

Dichlorphenamide vs. Placebo for Periodic Paralysis

Acronym: HYP-HOP

Important dates

Study start
2007
Primary completion
2013
Study completion
2013
First posted
Jun 29, 2007
Registry last updated
Jun 14, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.