Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center Yuexiu Campus
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510000, China
NCT Number: NCT06554184
This study is aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HR20013 versus palonosetron for nausea and vomiting associated with moderate emetic risk anticancer agents
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510000, China
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
HR20013 + dexamethasone + palonosetron placebo
Palonosetron + dexamethasone + HR20013 placebo
Time frame: 24-120 hours after initiation of moderate emetic risk anticancer agents
To compare the rate of subjects achieving complete response (defined as no emetic episode and no need for rescue medication) in the delayed phase after initiation of moderate emetic risk anticancer agents.
Time frame: 0 - 120 hours after initiation of moderate emetic risk anticancer agents
To compare the rate of subjects achieving complete response (defined as no emetic episode and no need for rescue medication) in the overall phase after initiation of moderate emetic risk anticancer agents.
Time frame: 0-24 hours after initiation of moderate emetic risk anticancer agents
To compare the rate of subjects achieving complete response (defined as no emetic episode and no need for rescue medication) in the acute phase after initiation of moderate emetic risk anticancer agents.
Time frame: the acute phase (0-24 hours), the delayed phase(24 - 120 hours), and the overall phase (0-120 hours) after initiation of moderate emetic risk anticancer agents, respectively
To compare the proportion of subjects achieving no significant nausea (defined as maximum nausea on a visual analogue scale<25 mm) in the acute phase (0-24 hours), the delayed phase(24 - 120 hours), and the overall phase (0-120 hours) after initiation of moderate emetic risk anticancer agents, respectively
Time frame: the acute phase (0-24 hours), the delayed phase(24 - 120 hours), and the overall phase (0-120 hours) after initiation of moderate emetic risk anticancer agents, respectively
To compare the proportion of subjects achieving no nausea (defined as maximum nausea on a visual analogue scale<5 mm) in the acute phase (0-24 hours), the delayed phase(24 - 120 hours), and the overall phase (0-120 hours) after initiation of moderate emetic risk anticancer agents, respectively
Time frame: the acute phase (0-24 hours), the delayed phase(24 - 120 hours), and the overall phase (0-120 hours) after initiation of moderate emetic risk anticancer agents, respectively
To compare the proportion of subjects with no emetic event in the acute phase (0-24 hours), the delayed phase(24 - 120 hours), and the overall phase (0-120 hours) after initiation of moderate emetic risk anticancer agents, respectively
Time frame: the acute phase (0-24 hours), the delayed phase(24 - 120 hours), and the overall phase (0-120 hours) after initiation of moderate emetic risk anticancer agents, respectively
To compare the proportion of subjects with no rescue medication in the acute phase (0-24 hours), the delayed phase(24 - 120 hours), and the overall phase (0-120 hours) after initiation of moderate emetic risk anticancer agents, respectively
Time frame: the acute phase (0-24 hours), the delayed phase(24 - 120 hours), and the overall phase (0-120 hours) after initiation of moderate emetic risk anticancer agents, respectively
To compare the proportion of subjects achieving complete protection (defined as no emetic episode, no significant nausea and no need for rescue medication) in the acute phase (0-24 hours), the delayed phase(24 - 120 hours), and the overall phase (0-120 hours) after initiation of moderate emetic risk anticancer agents, respectively
Time frame: the acute phase (0-24 hours), the delayed phase(24 - 120 hours), and the overall phase (0-120 hours) after initiation of moderate emetic risk anticancer agents, respectively
To compare the proportion of subjects achieving total control (defined as no emetic episode, no nausea and no need for rescue medication) in the acute phase (0-24 hours), the delayed phase (24 - 120 hours), and the overall phase (0-120 hours) after initiation of moderate emetic risk anticancer agents, respectively
Time frame: 0-120 hours after initiation of moderate emetic risk anticancer agents
Time to the first occurrence of emetic event or the first rescue medication
Time frame: 0-120 hours after initiation of moderate emetic risk anticancer agents
Changes in the score of FLIE before and after treatment
Time frame: Approximately 4 weeks
To analyse the rates of adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v5.0
Fujian Shengdi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Industry
A Randomized Phase III Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of HR20013 for Nausea and Vomiting Associated With Moderate Emetic Risk Anticancer Agents
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07738744
Abdominal Bloating, Abdominal Pain
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06755970
ICOUGH, Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Erzurum, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT05676294
Nausea, Pathologic Processes
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06899217
Abdominal Pain, Digestive System Diseases
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial Details