Yamil Lesmes
Bogotá, Colombia
NCT Number: NCT03785717
Guided bone regeneration (GBR) has been the most frequently used option to treat bone ridge deficiencies, allowing to restore such defects in order to place bone-integrated dental implants. A few reports exist in the literature about the augmentation of mandibular horizontal ridge defects before implant placement. Published studies show a large variability of reported results regarding horizontal bone augmentation. This can be due to the use of different types of membranes and bone graft materials or a combination thereof. Likewise, an important percentage of graft reabsorption is reported. Although this technique is very much used, an important number of cases must be re-treated or require placing bone graft during implant installation surgery. Techniques are required in order to improve vascularization of the grafts during GBR technique with the aim to improve their clinical success. Recent studies show great interest on the application of shock waves in oral diseases associated to infection and bone loss. The shock waves are acoustic waves that have effects on human biological tissues, stimulating the neo-angiogenesis and the development of a hyper cellularity, showing repairing characteristics on tissues, and starting regenerative processes as a result of metabolism improvement and the increase of local circulation. The extra corporeal shock waves can activate the osteoblasts and their precursors and they have been widely used in orthopaedics for repairing bone fractures. Several clinical studies have shown the effectiveness and safety of shock wave therapy in myocardial revascularization, lithotripsy, cellulitis, volar fasciitis, osteonecrosis, bone fractures, and complicated injuries of soft tissues. No clinical studies exist that assess its effect on guided bone regeneration. The evidence related to the positive effects of the use of shock waves on bone regeneration suggests this treatment as a novelty and a promising therapy that combined with the GBR technique for the treatment of horizontal defects could have an important impact on the potentialization of its clinical effectiveness.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me35 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Bogotá, Colombia
General Objective:
Assessing the efficacy of horizontal augmentation and percentage of reabsorption of bone graft material in the technique of guided bone regeneration (GBR), combined with the shock wave therapy (SWT) in the horizontal bone reconstruction of mandibular alveolar ridges.
Type of study:
Triple blind randomized clinical trial
Population and sample:
Twenty six patients of university and private clinical practice, who require augmentation of horizontal ridge in the mandible for back placing of an implant, and their compliance with inclusion and exclusion criteria, will be assessed.
Type of analysis:
Central trend and dispersion (medium and standard deviation) measurements will be obtained. Type of data distribution using Shapiro Wilk.
t-student test between no related groups for assessing bone augmentation. t-paired test between related groups for assessing pre and post treatment within the same group.
t test for proportion difference, in order to assess the percentage of reabsorption of bone graft, bone density, bone quality, within a same group.
Fisher, group comparison.
A multiple linear regression model will be developed in order to establish if the difference among groups is influenced by the initial width of the ridge and the thickness of the soft tissue.
In case of not following a normal distribution, no parametrical tests for related and no related groups and logistic regression, will be used.
The frequencies of adverse effects in each group will be obtained, and compared to the Chi2 test or the Fisher exact test.
All the analyses will be made with significance level of 5% (p< 0.05).
Effect measurements: Relative Risk (RR), Attributable Risk Reduction (ARR), and Necessary Number to be Treated (NNT). The augmentation of horizontal volume that allows the installation of a ≥4.1 mm implant will be taken as cutting point reference of clinical success.
Expected Results:
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Bone width augmentation using bone grafting and membrane non cross linking.
Before the bone width augmentation using bone grafting and membrane non cross linking, the patient was received ESWT (Extracorporeal shockwave therapy).
Time frame: Patients will be assessed prior the ROG, two weeks after ROG, and 6 months after ROG in order to determinate actual situation, the situation after the ROG placement and the reabsorption of ROG material.
Using specialized software in dental implantology, measurements are taken in the tomographies taken of each volunteer patient, in order to determine the increase in bone volume in the intervention, and its reabsorption after the healing process.
Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá
Other
Horizontal Guide Bone Regeneration With or Without Shock Waves: a Randomized Clinical Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07736287
Bone Regeneration, Wound Healing
Bangalore, Karnataka, India
View Trial DetailsNCT06168500
Bone Regeneration, Dental Implant
Sant Cugat del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT07160101
Bone Regeneration, Periodontal Intrabony Defects
Mahbūbnagar, Telangana, India
View Trial DetailsNCT04843488
Bone Regeneration, Dental Implants
Budapest, Hungary
View Trial Details