Hangzhou First People's Hospital
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT07629778
This study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter Phase Ib/II clinical study designed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and PK characteristics of HL-300 ointment with different concentration regimens for mild-to-moderate AD.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Location status: Recruiting
In the study, it is planned to enroll approximately 148-156 trial participants, divided into two cohorts. Cohort 1: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-parallel controlled study design, planning to enroll 140 trial participants, randomized in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to the study group or placebo group, with baseline disease severity (mild [vIGA-AD = 2] and moderate [vIGA-AD = 3]) set as stratification factors to ensure balanced participant status across groups. Cohort 2: an open-label, intensive sampling design, planning to enroll 8 trial participants for each dosage strength, enrolled separately, with continuous dosing for 8 days.
The study includes a screening period, a treatment period, and a follow-up period. The quality management system for this trial aims to prospectively integrate quality by design into all aspects of the trial to ensure the rights and interests, safety, and well-being of trial participants, and to guarantee the reliability of the generated data and the scientific validity of the trial results. This system strictly adheres to the principles of ICH E6(R3) and ICH E8(R1), employing a risk-based and proportionate approach.
During the trial design phase, the investigators have systematically identified the critical to quality (CtQ) factors for ensuring the quality of this trial. Given the known safety profile of JAK inhibitors (e.g., infections, hematologic abnormalities, hepatic and renal function effects, thrombosis, etc.), the CtQ factors for this trial will specifically focus on:
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
(1) Any significant clinical and laboratory abnormalities that the investigator believes may affect trial participant safety, including but not limited to:
Group A receives the investigational product at a concentration of 0.25%, BID,4 weeks.
BID, day 7.
Time frame: 4 weeks
Percentage change from baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score at Week 4 (W4).
The EASI score ranges from 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating more severe AD.
Time frame: at Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 6 after treatment.
Change from baseline in EASI score at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 after treatment. The EASI score ranges from 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating more severe AD.
Time frame: at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 after treatment
Proportion of trial participants with ≥50% improvement from baseline in EASI score (EASI50) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 after treatment.
The EASI score ranges from 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating more severe AD.
Time frame: at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 after treatment
Proportion of trial participants with ≥75% improvement from baseline in EASI score (EASI75) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 after treatment.
The EASI score ranges from 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating more severe AD.
Time frame: at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 after treatment.
Proportion of trial participants with ≥90% improvement from baseline in EASI score (EASI90) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 after treatment.
The EASI score ranges from 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating more severe AD.
Time frame: at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 after treatment.
Proportion of trial participants achieving vIGA-AD score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) and ≥2-point improvement from baseline at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 after treatment.
The vIGA-AD scale divides disease severity into 5 grades (0 = clear; 1 = almost clear; 2 = mild; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe), each corresponding to specific skin lesion morphological characteristics. A higher grade indicates greater severity.
Time frame: at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 after treatment.
Proportion of trial participants achieving vIGA-AD score of 0 or 1 at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 after treatment.
The vIGA-AD scale divides disease severity into 5 grades (0 = clear; 1 = almost clear; 2 = mild; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe), each corresponding to specific skin lesion morphological characteristics. A higher grade indicates greater severity.
Time frame: at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 after treatment.
Change from baseline in weekly average itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 after treatment.
This scale assesses the most severe itch intensity subjectively felt by the trial participant due to AD in the past 24 h. The scale rates itch intensity on 10 levels (0 means no itch, 10 means the worst itch imaginable), with integer scores.The higher the score, the greater the disease severity.
Time frame: at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 after treatment
Percentage of trial participants with ≥4-point improvement from baseline in weekly average itch NRS at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 after treatment.
This scale assesses the most severe itch intensity subjectively felt by the trial participant due to AD in the past 24 h. The scale rates itch intensity on 10 levels (0 means no itch, 10 means the worst itch imaginable), with integer scores.The higher the score, the greater the disease severity.
Time frame: at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 after treatment.
]Change from baseline and percentage change from baseline in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 after treatment.
The SCORAD score ranging from 0 to 103 points. Based on the score, the condition is classified as mild (0-24 points), moderate (25-50 points), and severe (>50 points).
Time frame: at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 after treatment.
Change from baseline and percentage change from baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) affected by AD at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 after treatment.
The BSA ranges from 0% to 100%. The larger the range, the more severe the affected area.
Time frame: at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 after treatment.
Change from baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 after treatment.
DLQI contains 10 questions, with a total score ranging from 0 to 30.The higher the score, the greater the impact on quality of life.
Hangzhou Highlightll Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd
Industry
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase Ib/II Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of HL-300 Ointment in Patients With Mild-to-Moderate Atopic Dermatitis
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07262983
Atopic Dermatitis, Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04419584
Atopic Dermatitis, Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities
Hong Kong
View Trial DetailsNCT07467564
Atopic Dermatitis, Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities
Doha, Qatar
View Trial DetailsNCT07216027
Atopic Dermatitis, Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities
Northridge, California, United States
View Trial Details