Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02147613

High Intensity Interval Exercise in Diastolic Heart Failure

Heart failure is a major health concern and is the leading cause of hospitalization among elderly Americans. Currently 5.7 million Americans are estimated to have heart failure and the estimated direct and indirect costs of treating heart failure are approximately $37.2 billion. Approximately 40% of those diagnosed with heart failure will have heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF). These individuals have significant restrictions in their ability to carry out activities of daily living. Exercise training has been established as adjuvant therapy in heart failure. Although exercise training guidelines for treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFREF) are well established, no consensus exercise guidelines exist for management of HFPEF. Aerobic and cardiovascular adaptations are generally greater after high-intensity exercise training; interval-type exercise facilitates this type of training because it allows for rest periods that make it possible for patients with heart failure to perform short (e.g., 1-4 minutes) work periods at intensities that are higher than would be possible during continuous exercise. High-intensity aerobic interval training presents a unique, yet untested, therapeutic modality for the exercise training of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Pilot testing is warranted, results of which may have important implications for reducing cardiovascular risk, increasing short- and long-term quality of life and survival, and reducing healthcare costs in this patient population. The investigators primary specific aim is to determine the efficacy of a novel, high-intensity aerobic interval exercise training program for improving VO2peak (peak oxygen uptake), endothelial function, and arterial stiffness in patients with HFPEF. The investigators secondary aim is to determine whether the vascular changes are correlated with the changes in VO2peak.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

40 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Heart failure is a major health concern and is the leading cause of hospitalization among elderly Americans. Currently 5.7 million Americans are estimated to have heart failure and the estimated direct and indirect costs of treating heart failure are approximately $37.2 billion. Approximately 40% of those diagnosed with heart failure will have heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF).2 These individuals have significant restrictions in their ability to carry out activities of daily living.

Exercise training has been established as adjuvant therapy in heart failure.4 Although exercise training guidelines for treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFREF) are well established, no consensus exercise guidelines exist for management of HFPEF. Exercise training increases VO2peak, thus improving prognosis for patients with heart failure. Indeed, VO2peak has been reported to be the single best predictor of mortality in those with cardiac disease.6 Exercise training also improves endothelial function and reduces arterial stiffness, as well as enhancing quality of life.7,8 Because HFPEF is associated with a both diastolic dysfunction and a loss of compensatory systemic vasodilator reserves, arterial stiffness and endothelial function are especially important in this population.

Aerobic and cardiovascular adaptations are generally greater after high-intensity exercise training; interval-type exercise facilitates this type of training because it allows for rest periods that make it possible for patients with heart failure to perform short (e.g., 1-4 minutes) work periods at intensities that are higher than would be possible during continuous exercise. For example, Wisloff et al. demonstrated the superiority of high-intensity aerobic interval training, as compared to continuous, moderate-intensity exercise training, in patients with stable postinfarction heart failure (with reduced ejection fraction). Not only was VO2peak and FMD improved more, patients tolerated the high-intensity program without reported incident. Furthermore, they found it "motivating to have a varied procedure to follow," whereas patients found the continuous exercise group training sessions to be "quite boring." High-intensity aerobic interval training presents a unique, yet untested, therapeutic modality for the exercise training of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Pilot testing is warranted, results of which may have important implications for reducing cardiovascular risk, increasing short- and long-term quality of life and survival, and reducing healthcare costs in this patient population.Patients undergoing exercise training live on average 2.16 years longer at the extremely low cost-effectiveness ratio of $1494 per life year saved.Since the majority of this patient population belongs to the Medicare age group, this intervention has significant potential to reduce healthcare costs.

Hypotheses and Specific Aims Our primary specific aim is to determine the efficacy of a novel, high-intensity aerobic interval exercise training program for improving VO2peak, endothelial function, and arterial stiffness in patients with HFPEF. Our secondary aim is to determine whether the vascular changes are correlated with the changes in VO2peak.

We hypothesize that improvements in VO2peak, endothelial function, and arterial stiffness will be greater after the high-intensity aerobic interval training program and that vascular adaptations will be correlated with changes in VO2peak.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • HFpEF diagnosis with New York Heart Association heart failure Class II-III symptoms

Exclusion criteria

  • Unstable angina
  • Myocardial infarction in the past 4 weeks
  • Uncompensated heart failure
  • New York Heart Association class IV symptoms
  • Complex ventricular arrhythmias (at rest or during the maximal exercise test)
  • Medical or orthopedic conditions that precluded treadmill walking
  • Symptomatic severe aortic stenosis
  • Acute pulmonary embolus
  • Acute myocarditis
  • Medication non-compliance

Treatment and study plan

High Intensity Interval Training

Other

3 days per week at 85-90% peak heart rate (4x4 bouts) for 1 month (12 sessions of exercise)

Moderate intensity exercise training

Other

3 days/week, 30 mins at 70% Peak heart rate for 1 month (12 sessions of exercise)

Primary outcomes

  1. Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction

    Time frame: Before and after the 1 month exercise intervention

    Measured using left ventricular echocardiography. Diastolic dysfunction is graded as: normal, grade 1, grade 2, grade 3, grade 4. Increasing grade is indicative of worsening LV dysfunction and worse outcomes. Improvement in LV grade is associated with better long term outcomes.

Secondary outcomes

  1. VO2peak

    Time frame: Test carried out before and after the 1 month long exercise intervention.

    Measured using a graded exercise test (modified Bruce protocol) with 12-lead EKG monitoring and ventilatory gas exchange analysis.

Other outcomes

  1. Brachial Artery Flow-mediated Dilation

    Time frame: Before and after 1-month exercise intervention

    Reactive hyperemia mediated brachial artery dilation will be measured after 5 minutes of ischemia with forearm cuff occlusion. Artery will be continuously monitored using B-mode ultrasound.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Arizona State University

Other

Collaborators

  • Mayo Clinic
  • University of Alberta

Registry information

Official study title

High-intensity Aerobic Interval Training vs. Moderate-intensity Continuous Exercise Training in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Important dates

Study start
2010
Primary completion
2012
Study completion
2012
First posted
May 28, 2014
Registry last updated
Apr 12, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.