Hospital Britanico de Buenos Aires
Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, 1280AED, Argentina
NCT Number: NCT06086769
The use of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) has increased. Diaphragmatic ultrasonography is a tool that, as a noninvasive complement to esophageal pressure (Pes) measurement, allows the evaluation of diaphragm function and reflects, through the diaphragm thickening fraction (DTf), the magnitude of diaphragmatic fiber recruitment. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of HFNC therapy on the DTf in healthy subjects. Second, this study aimed to assess the behavior of the respiratory rate (RR) and the work of breathing in these subjects.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–35 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, 1280AED, Argentina
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Measurement of diaphragm thickening fraction, respiratory rate and esophageal pressure swing with calculation of diaphragmatic pressure-time product without the use of HFNC and with the use of HFNC at 20 and 40 Liters per minute
Other names: diaphragm thickening fraction, esophageal pressure swing, Respiratory rate
Time frame: Immediately after 5 min of each condition (baseline, 20 and 40 liters per minute) the diaphragmatic thickness was measured at the end of inspiration y de la expiration during 3 consecutive respiratory cycles (each cycle is between 3 and 10 seconds)
ultrasound measurements were performed by an expert operator (the same in all cases). The ultrasound measurement was performed using a high-resolution linear transducer in real-time in B-mode.
The diaphragm thickness was measured at the end of expiration and the end of inspiration of the same ventilatory cycle and the average value of 3 ventilatory cycles was recorded. A 2-minute washout period was allowed between each test condition to avoid the summation of effects.
The DTf and PTPes/min were calculated for each subject in each available condition (baseline - without flow- , wtih 20 and 40 liters per minute):
DTf = End Inspiratory Diaphragm thickening - End Expiratory Diaphragm thickening / End Expiratory Diaphragm thickening x 100
Time frame: The number of breaths per minute was recorded in 60 seconds.
The number of breaths per minute was recorded in 60 seconds.
Time frame: 5 minutes each condition
Difference between basal Pes and maximum inspiratory Pes deflection.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 24 weeks
It was calculated as the area determined by esophageal deflection multiplied by respiratory rate. An ad hoc software developed in MATLAB R2018b (The MathWorks, Inc. Massachusetts, United States) was used for this purpose.
Argentinian Intensive Care Society
Other
Impact of High Flow Oxygen Therapy on Diaphragm Thickening Fraction in Healthy Subjects. A Prospective Cohort Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02725190
Diaphragm, Dyssomnias
Poitiers, France
View Trial DetailsNCT05447078
Healthy Volunteers, Infections
Jackson, Mississippi, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07513532
Healthy Volunteers
Seattle, Washington, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07090655
Healthy Volunteers
Brisbane, Australia
View Trial Details