Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07661303

Hemoadsorpion in Patients With Septic Shock: Efficacy and Safety Evaluation

Hemoadsorpion in Patients With Septic Shock: Efficacy and Safety Evaluation. A Pilot Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

The goal of this clinical trial is the estimation of the efficacy and safety of hemoadsorption procedures (LPS (Lipopolysaccharide) and inflammatory mediators adsorption) in participants with septic shock.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does hemoadsorption decrease the severity of MODS (multiple organ disfunction syndrome)?

The study will include participants aged 18 to 80 years with a verified diagnosis of septic shock according to SEPSIS 3 criteria, diagnosed within 12 hours, and a SOFA (sequential organ failure assessment) score of 9 or more.

In addition to Standard of Care (SOC), blood purification, including hemoadsorption, will be used. The minimum waiting time after diagnosis of septic shock and initiation of basic therapy before inclusion of the patient in the study therapy is 4 hours.

The choice of procedure will be based on the EAA (Endotoxin Activity Assay) result:

* for an EAA level of 0.6-0.9, selective lipopolysaccharide (LPS) adsorption with duration from 2 to 10 hours; * for an EAA level less than 0.6, inflammatory mediator adsorption with duration from 6 to 12 hours.

The choice of a specific adsorbers within the LPS and inflammatory mediator adsorption group will be based on randomization.

The use of LPS adsorption is planned based on randomization: Toramyxin R-20 or Efferon LPS. The use of inflammatory mediator adsorption is planned based on randomization: Jafron (HA 330) or CytoSorb.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Bakulev Scientific Center of Cardiovascular Surgery, Moscow, Russia

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Every participant will receive 2 adsorption procedures. The second procedure will be initiated no later than 24 hours after the initiation of the first procedure.

LPS adsorption will be performed in 38 participants (Efferon LPS in 19 participants and Toramyxin in 19 participants), two procedures per participant.

Inflammatory mediator adsorption will be performed in 38 participants (Jafron HA 330 in 19 participants and CytoSorb in 19 participants), two procedures per participant.

Sample size calculations were performed separately for each treatment cohort. For the endotoxemia cohort (EAA level of 0.6-0.9), this randomized trial is designed to compare Efferron LPS and Toraymyxin with respect to change in SOFA score at 72 hours.

At present, no universally accepted minimal clinically important difference (MCID) has been established for the SOFA score in participants with septic shock. Therefore, the assumed treatment effect was derived from published evidence and expert clinical judgment.

In the EUPHAS trial, polymyxin B hemoperfusion was associated with a mean reduction in SOFA score of approximately 3.4 points at 72 hours, whereas minimal change was observed in the control group. Similarly, the LASSO study demonstrated substantial improvement in organ dysfunction following endotoxin adsorption therapy.

For the inflammatory mediator adsorption cohort (EAA level less than 0.6), this randomized trial is designed to compare CytoSorb and Jafron HA 330 with respect to change in SOFA score at 72 hours.

In the retrospective study Mehta et al., CytoSorb hemoperfusion was associated with a mean reduction in SOFA score of approximately 2.0 points after treatment in survival group. Similarly, the case series Onuk et al. demonstrated substantial improvement in organ dysfunction following inflammatory adsorption therapy with Jafron HA 330 with a mean reduction in SOFA score of approximately 3.5 points at 72 hours.

A between-group difference of 2.5 SOFA points was considered clinically meaningful for both Endotoxin hemoadsorption and inflammatory mediators hemoadsorption because it represents a substantial proportion of the treatment effect observed in previous hemoperfusion studies and corresponds to a clinically relevant difference in the degree of organ dysfunction improvement.

The sample size for both groups (LPS and inflammatory mediator adsorption) was calculated based on the following assumption: the primary endpoint was the change in SOFA score at 72 hours (ΔSOFA); the expected between-group difference - 2.5 points on the SOFA score; standard deviation of ΔSOFA - 2.5 points; equal allocation ratio (1:1); two-sided significance level (α) of 0.05; statistical power of 80%.

Sample size estimation was performed in R using the power.t.test() function. The calculation yielded a required sample size of 16.7 participants per group. Therefore, a minimum of 17 participants per group (34 participants in total) is required to achieve the planned statistical power.

To account for an anticipated 10% dropout rate, the final sample size will be 19 patients per group (38 participants in total for LPS+ 38 participants in total for Inflammatory mediators adsorption. 76 participants in total).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Septic shock according to SEPSIS-3 criteria
  • Age: 18-80 years
  • SOFA ≥9 points
  • Diagnosis of septic shock established <12 hours ago
  • Invasive hemodynamic monitoring
  • Norepinephrine dose >0.2 mcg/kg/min

Exclusion criteria

  • Absolute neutrophil count less than 500 cells/μL
  • Pregnancy
  • End-stage heart failure (NYHA stage IV)
  • Pulmonary embolism with obstructive shock
  • Ongoing bleeding
  • Atonic coma
  • More than 30 points on the MELD scale, class C on the Child-Pugh scale
  • HIV infection
  • Burns over 10% of the body surface area
  • Patients with oncohematological diseases
  • Patients with a recognized palliative status or the definition of "metastatic cancer"
  • RRT using membranes with a high cutoff point and increased adsorption capacity within 72 hours from the initiation of the first hemoadsorption procedure
  • Use of plasma exchange within 72 hours from the initiation of the first hemoadsorption procedure

Treatment and study plan

Efferon LPS

Device

Blood purification with Efferon LPS

Toramyxin PMX 20R

Device

Blood purification with Toramyxin PMX 20R

Jafron HA 330

Device

Blood purification with Jafron HA 330

CytoSorb

Device

Blood purification with Jafron HA 330

Primary outcomes

  1. SOFA (sequential organ failure assessment) score

    Time frame: Assessed at 72 hours after hemoadsorption initiation

    MODS (multiple organ disfunction syndrome) dynamics majored by SOFA (sequential organ failure assessment) score. SOFA score ranges from 0 (best) to 24 (worst) points.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Vasoactive Inotropic Score (VIS) dynamics

    Time frame: Assessed at 4 time points: before hemoadsorption initiation (baseline); 24 hours, 48 hours and 72 hours after hemoadsorption initiation

    Vasoactive Inotropic Score (VIS) dynamics

    VIS = dopamine dose (mcg∕kg∕ min ) + dobutamine dose (mcg∕kg∕ min ) + 100 × epinephrine dose (mcg∕kg∕ min ) + 10 × milrinone dose (mcg∕kg∕ min ) + 10,000 × vasopressin dose (units∕kg∕ min )

    + 100 × norepinephrine dose (mcg∕kg∕ min )

  2. Norepinephrine dose dynamics

    Time frame: Assessed at 4 time points: before hemoadsorption initiation (baseline); 24 hours, 48 hours and 72 hours after hemoadsorption initiation

    Norepinephrine dose dynamics (mcg/kg/min)

  3. Hemodynamic index dynamics

    Time frame: Assessed at 4 time points: before hemoadsorption initiation (baseline); 24 hours, 48 hours and 72 hours after hemoadsorption initiation

    Hemodynamic index: Mean arterial pressure (MAP) to Vasoactive Inotropic Score (VIS);

    VIS = dopamine dose (mcg∕kg∕ min ) + dobutamine dose (mcg∕kg∕ min ) + 100 × epinephrine dose (mcg∕kg∕ min ) + 10 × milrinone dose (mcg∕kg∕ min ) + 10,000 × vasopressin dose (units∕kg∕ min ) + 100 × norepinephrine dose (mcg∕kg∕ min )

  4. Horowitz index dynamics

    Time frame: Assessed at 4 time points: before hemoadsorption initiation (baseline); 24 hours, 48 hours and 72 hours after hemoadsorption initiation

    Arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2)/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ratio (Horowitz index) dynamics

  5. Lactate level dynamics

    Time frame: Assessed at 4 time points: before hemoadsorption initiation (baseline); 24 hours, 48 hours and 72 hours after hemoadsorption initiation

    Lactate level dynamics (mmol/l)

  6. Total bilirubin level dynamics

    Time frame: Assessed at 4 time points: before hemoadsorption initiation (baseline); 24 hours, 48 hours and 72 hours after hemoadsorption initiation

    Total bilirubin level dynamics (mcmol/l)

  7. Indirect bilirubin level dynamics

    Time frame: Time Frame: Assessed at 4 time points: before hemoadsorption initiation (baseline); 24 hours, 48 hours and 72 hours after hemoadsorption initiation

    Indirect bilirubin level dynamics (mcmol/l)

  8. Direct bilirubin level dynamics

    Time frame: Time Frame: Assessed at 4 time points: before hemoadsorption initiation (baseline); 24 hours, 48 hours and 72 hours after hemoadsorption initiation

    Direct bilirubin level dynamics (mcmol/l)

  9. Ferritin level dynamics

    Time frame: Time Frame: Assessed at 4 time points: before hemoadsorption initiation (baseline); 24 hours, 48 hours and 72 hours after hemoadsorption initiation

    Ferritin level dynamics (mcg/l)

  10. Procalcitonin (PCT) level dynamics

    Time frame: Time Frame: Assessed at 4 time points: before hemoadsorption initiation (baseline); 24 hours, 48 hours and 72 hours after hemoadsorption initiation

    Procalcitonin (PCT) level dynamics (ng/ml)

  11. C- reactive protein (CRP) level dynamics

    Time frame: Time Frame: Assessed at 4 time points: before hemoadsorption initiation (baseline); 24 hours, 48 hours and 72 hours after hemoadsorption initiation

    C- reactive protein (CRP) level dynamics (mg/l)

  12. NLR (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio) dynamics

    Time frame: Time Frame: Assessed at 4 time points: before hemoadsorption initiation (baseline); 24 hours, 48 hours and 72 hours after hemoadsorption initiation

    NLR (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio) dynamics

  13. PLR (Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio) dynamics

    Time frame: Assessed at 4 time points: before hemoadsorption initiation (baseline); 24 hours, 48 hours and 72 hours after hemoadsorption initiation

    PLR (Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio) dynamics

  14. TNF (Tumor necrosis factor-alpha) level dynamics

    Time frame: Assessed at 3 time points: before hemoadsorption initiation (baseline); 48 hours and 72 hours after hemoadsorption initiation

    TNF (Tumor necrosis factor-alpha) level dynamics (pg/ml)

  15. IL 6 (Interleukin 6) level dynamics

    Time frame: Assessed at 3 time points: before hemoadsorption initiation (baseline); 48 hours and 72 hours after hemoadsorption initiation

    IL 6 (Interleukin 6) level dynamics (pg/ml)

  16. IL 10 (Interleukin 10) level dynamics

    Time frame: Time Frame: Assessed at 3 time points: before hemoadsorption initiation (baseline); 48 hours and 72 hours after hemoadsorption initiation

    IL 10 (Interleukin 10) level dynamics (pg/ml)

  17. 28 - days mortality

    Time frame: Will be calculated for 28 days after hemoadsorption initiation

    28 - days mortality

  18. 90 - days mortality

    Time frame: Will be calculated for 90 days after hemoadsorption initiation

    90 - days mortality

  19. SOFA (sequential organ failure assessment) dynamics

    Time frame: Assessed at 4 time points: before hemoadsorption initiatioin (baseline); at 24, 48 and 120 hours after hemoadsorption initiation

    MODS (multiple organ disfunction syndrome) dynamics majored by SOFA (sequential organ failure assessment) score

  20. SOFA 2 (sequential organ failure assessment) dynamics

    Time frame: Assessed at 5 time points: before hemoadsorption initiatioin (baseline); at 24, 48, 72 and 120 hours after hemoadsorption initiation

    MODS (multiple organ disfunction syndrome) dynamics majored by SOFA 2 (sequential organ failure assessment) score

Other outcomes

  1. Ventilator-free days

    Time frame: Will be calculated for 28 days after hemoadsorption initiation

    Ventilator-free days

  2. Vasopressor-free days

    Time frame: Will be calculated for 28 days after hemoadsorption initiation

    Vasopressor-free days

  3. Dialysis-free days

    Time frame: Will be calculated for 28 days after hemoadsorption initiation

    Dialysis-free days

  4. Hospital length of stay

    Time frame: Will be calculated for 28 days after hemoadsorption initiation

    Hospital length of stay

  5. Intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay

    Time frame: Will be calculated for 28 days after hemoadsorption initiation

    Intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay

  6. AEs (adverse events)

    Time frame: Serious AEs will be reported up to Day 28

    The safety will be assessed by analysing the number of adverse events (AEs) where causal relationship with the intervention cannot be excluded, up until Day 28.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Aleksandr Burov, PHD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+79854215478

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Moscow Multidisciplinary Clinical Center "Kommunarka"

Other Gov

Collaborators

  • Bakulev Scientific Center of Cardiovascular Surgery
  • City Clinical Hospital No 52, Moscow, Russia
  • City clinical hospital named after S. S. Yudin, Moscow City Health
  • Petrovsky National Research Centre of Surgery
  • Rostov Regional Clinical Hospital
  • Sklifosovsky Institute of Emergency Care

Registry information

Official study title

Hemoadsorpion in Patients With Septic Shock: Efficacy and Safety Evaluation. A Pilot Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Acronym: HAdSS

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Jun 22, 2026
Registry last updated
Jul 2, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.