Health in Motion- A Pragmatic Clinical Trial- Home

Number of falls per month / number of participants x 1000

Number of falls per month / number of participants x 1000

Number of falls per month / number of participants x 1000

Number of falls per month / number of participants x 1000

Time taken to stand up from a seated position, walk 10 feet, turn around, return to the chair, sit down

Time taken to stand up from a seated position, walk 10 feet, turn around, return to the chair, sit down

Time taken to stand up from a seated position, walk 10 feet, turn around, return to the chair, sit down

Time taken to stand up from a seated position, walk 10 feet, turn around, return to the chair, sit down

This test measures the ability to stand for 10 seconds in 4 progressively more challenging positions from standing with feet side by side to standing on one leg. The score is equal to the total time taken to achieve the highest level. The maximum score is 40. If a participant is not able to stand with their feet in tandem, they are considered at higher risk of falling.

This test measures the ability to stand for 10 seconds in 4 progressively more challenging positions from standing with feet side by side to standing on one leg. The score is equal to the total time taken to achieve the highest level. The maximum score is 40. If a participant is not able to stand with their feet in tandem, they are considered at higher risk of falling.

This test measures the ability to stand for 10 seconds in 4 progressively more challenging positions from standing with feet side by side to standing on one leg. The score is equal to the total time taken to achieve the highest level. The maximum score is 40. If a participant is not able to stand with their feet in tandem, they are considered at higher risk of falling.

This test measures the ability to stand for 10 seconds in 4 progressively more challenging positions from standing with feet side by side to standing on one leg. The score is equal to the total time taken to achieve the highest level. The maximum score is 40. If a participant is not able to stand with their feet in tandem, they are considered at higher risk of falling.

This test measures the ability to stand for on one leg for up to 30 seconds. If a participant is not able to stand for 5 seconds, they are considered at higher risk of falling.

This test measures the ability to stand for on one leg for up to 30 seconds. If a participant is not able to stand for 5 seconds, they are considered at higher risk of falling.

This test measures the ability to stand for on one leg for up to 30 seconds. If a participant is not able to stand for 5 seconds, they are considered at higher risk of falling.

This test measures the ability to stand for on one leg for up to 30 seconds. If a participant is not able to stand for 5 seconds, they are considered at higher risk of falling.

This test measures the number of times a participant can stand up from a seated position in 30 seconds.

This test measures the number of times a participant can stand up from a seated position in 30 seconds.

This test measures the number of times a participant can stand up from a seated position in 30 seconds.

This test measures the number of times a participant can stand up from a seated position in 30 seconds.

This is a multi-factorial questionnaire that can be used to predict fall risk. Questions relate to history of falls, gait/balance, muscle weakness, incontinence, sensation/proprioception, depression, vision and medications. The highest (worst) score = 14. A score of 0-3 denotes low fall risk and scores from 4-14 denote higher fall risk.

This is a multi-factorial questionnaire that can be used to predict fall risk. Questions relate to history of falls, gait/balance, muscle weakness, incontinence, sensation/proprioception, depression, vision and medications. The highest (worst) score = 14. A score of 0-3 denotes low fall risk and scores from 4-14 denote higher fall risk.

This is a multi-factorial questionnaire that can be used to predict fall risk. Questions relate to history of falls, gait/balance, muscle weakness, incontinence, sensation/proprioception, depression, vision and medications. The highest (worst) score = 14. A score of 0-3 denotes low fall risk and scores from 4-14 denote higher fall risk.

This is a multi-factorial questionnaire that can be used to predict fall risk. Questions relate to history of falls, gait/balance, muscle weakness, incontinence, sensation/proprioception, depression, vision and medications. The highest (worst) score = 14. A score of 0-3 denotes low fall risk and scores from 4-14 denote higher fall risk.

This questionnaire measures the participant's confidence in performing activities of daily living in which each item is rated from 0% (no confidence) to 100% (complete confidence). It correlates with other measures of self-efficacy and balance measures.

This questionnaire measures the participant's confidence in performing activities of daily living in which each item is rated from 0% (no confidence) to 100% (complete confidence). It correlates with other measures of self-efficacy and balance measures.

This questionnaire measures the participant's confidence in performing activities of daily living in which each item is rated from 0% (no confidence) to 100% (complete confidence). It correlates with other measures of self-efficacy and balance measures.

This questionnaire measures the participant's confidence in performing activities of daily living in which each item is rated from 0% (no confidence) to 100% (complete confidence). It correlates with other measures of self-efficacy and balance measures.

This questionnaire measures quality of life over the past 4 weeks.

This questionnaire measures quality of life over the past 4 weeks.

This questionnaire measures quality of life over the past 4 weeks.

This questionnaire measures quality of life over the past 4 weeks.

This is a standardized measure of health status for clinical and economic appraisal. The test is a self report health state that domains including mobility, self-care, anxiety/depression, pain/discomfort) using a 5 point scale and a visual analog scale (VAS).

We will calculate quality-adjusted life years (QALY) using the EQ-5D-5L and the appropriate weights from each instrument to compare differences in the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios.

This is a standardized measure of health status for clinical and economic appraisal. The test is a self report health state that domains including mobility, self-care, anxiety/depression, pain/discomfort) using a 5 point scale and a visual analog scale (VAS).

We will calculate quality-adjusted life years (QALY) using the EQ-5D-5L and the appropriate weights from each instrument to compare differences in the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios.

This is a standardized measure of health status for clinical and economic appraisal. The test is a self report health state that domains including mobility, self-care, anxiety/depression, pain/discomfort) using a 5 point scale and a visual analog scale (VAS).

We will calculate quality-adjusted life years (QALY) using the EQ-5D-5L and the appropriate weights from each instrument to compare differences in the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios.

This is a standardized measure of health status for clinical and economic appraisal. The test is a self report health state that domains including mobility, self-care, anxiety/depression, pain/discomfort) using a 5 point scale and a visual analog scale (VAS).

We will calculate quality-adjusted life years (QALY) using the EQ-5D-5L and the appropriate weights from each instrument to compare differences in the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios.

Time Taken: The Health in Motion App captures data time taken to complete the lessons.

Qualitative Analysis of text entries.

The System Usability Scale is used to evaluate usability and learnability of software products. We will use information from this survey to improve the usability of Health in Motion. The test uses a 0-5 Likert scale. The statements are worded such that the best score alternates between 1 (Strongly Disagree) and 5 (Strongly Agree). For example, statement #1 is "I think that I would like to use this system frequently" whereas statement #2 is "I found this system unnecessarily complex". The participant's scores for each question are converted to a new number, added together, and then multiplied by 2.5 to convert the original scores of 0-40 to 0-100. Though the scores are 0-100, these are not percentages and should be considered only in terms of their percentile ranking.

SUS scores above 68 are considered above average and anything below 68 is below average.

The System Usability Scale is used to evaluate usability and learnability of software products. We will use information from this survey to improve the usability of Health in Motion. The test uses a 0-5 Likert scale. The statements are worded such that the best score alternates between 1 (Strongly Disagree) and 5 (Strongly Agree). For example, statement #1 is "I think that I would like to use this system frequently" whereas statement #2 is "I found this system unnecessarily complex". The participant's scores for each question are converted to a new number, added together, and then multiplied by 2.5 to convert the original scores of 0-40 to 0-100. Though the scores are 0-100, these are not percentages and should be considered only in terms of their percentile ranking.

SUS scores above 68 are considered above average and anything below 68 is below average.

The System Usability Scale is used to evaluate usability and learnability of software products. We will use information from this survey to improve the usability of Health in Motion. The test uses a 0-5 Likert scale. The statements are worded such that the best score alternates between 1 (Strongly Disagree) and 5 (Strongly Agree). For example, statement #1 is "I think that I would like to use this system frequently" whereas statement #2 is "I found this system unnecessarily complex". The participant's scores for each question are converted to a new number, added together, and then multiplied by 2.5 to convert the original scores of 0-40 to 0-100. Though the scores are 0-100, these are not percentages and should be considered only in terms of their percentile ranking.

SUS scores above 68 are considered above average and anything below 68 is below average.

The System Usability Scale is used to evaluate usability and learnability of software products. We will use information from this survey to improve the usability of Health in Motion. The test uses a 0-5 Likert scale. The statements are worded such that the best score alternates between 1 (Strongly Disagree) and 5 (Strongly Agree). For example, statement #1 is "I think that I would like to use this system frequently" whereas statement #2 is "I found this system unnecessarily complex". The participant's scores for each question are converted to a new number, added together, and then multiplied by 2.5 to convert the original scores of 0-40 to 0-100. Though the scores are 0-100, these are not percentages and should be considered only in terms of their percentile ranking.

SUS scores above 68 are considered above average and anything below 68 is below average.

This is a standardized test of cognitive function. The test consists of two Trails, Trail A and Trail B. Trail A requires the participant to tap on 25 numbers on the screen in order from smallest to largest (1, 2, 3, etc). Trail B requires participants to tap on alternative numbers and letters in consecutive order from smallest/first to largest/last (1, A, 2, B, 3, C etc).

This is a standardized test of cognitive function. The test consists of two Trails, Trail A and Trail B. Trail A requires the participant to tap on 25 numbers on the screen in order from smallest to largest (1, 2, 3, etc). Trail B requires participants to tap on alternative numbers and letters in consecutive order from smallest/first to largest/last (1, A, 2, B, 3, C etc).

This is a standardized test of cognitive function. The test consists of two Trails, Trail A and Trail B. Trail A requires the participant to tap on 25 numbers on the screen in order from smallest to largest (1, 2, 3, etc). Trail B requires participants to tap on alternative numbers and letters in consecutive order from smallest/first to largest/last (1, A, 2, B, 3, C etc).

This is a standardized test of cognitive function. The test consists of two Trails, Trail A and Trail B. Trail A requires the participant to tap on 25 numbers on the screen in order from smallest to largest (1, 2, 3, etc). Trail B requires participants to tap on alternative numbers and letters in consecutive order from smallest/first to largest/last (1, A, 2, B, 3, C etc).

This is a standardized self-report assessment that measures behaviors that may be avoided due to a fear of falling

This is a standardized self-report assessment that measures behaviors that may be avoided due to a fear of falling

This is a standardized self-report assessment that measures behaviors that may be avoided due to a fear of falling

This is a standardized self-report assessment that measures behaviors that may be avoided due to a fear of falling

The Depression Screen is a 2-item questionnaire that asks about how the person has been feeling over the past 2 weeks.

The Depression Screen is a 2-item questionnaire that asks about how the person has been feeling over the past 2 weeks.

The Depression Screen is a 2-item questionnaire that asks about how the person has been feeling over the past 2 weeks.

The Depression Screen is a 2-item questionnaire that asks about how the person has been feeling over the past 2 weeks.

Average number of days per week the exercise program was completed

Total number of repetitions of all exercises completed

Total number of education modules completed