King's College London
London, se1 9nh, United Kingdom
NCT Number: NCT03694223
There is evidence for the use of a diet low in short chain fermentable carbohydrates (low FODMAP diet) in the management of functional gut symptoms, such as abdominal pain and bloating. However, the provision of advice on the low FODMAP diet can be challenging due to limited resources and the need for a dietitian with expertise in the low FODMAP diet. The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility in terms of recruitment and retention in planning a future trial. The purpose of the future trial will be to investigate the clinical and cost effectiveness, as well as the acceptability of different education methods of the low FODMAP diet for the treatment of IBS.
To date, there are no studies on the implementation of the low FOMDAP diet using a mobile app or leaflets in the education of the low FODMAP diet. Therefore, a feasibility study design was chosen in order to obtain key data on recruitment and retention rates at each study group.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
London, se1 9nh, United Kingdom
A low FODMAP diet includes FODMAP restriction, FODMAP re-introduction and FODMAP personalisation. This study will focus on FODMAP restriction whereby foods high in FODMAPs are avoided for 4 weeks.
Patients with IBS will be recruited from primary and secondary care centres.
STUDY GROUPS
Group 1: 2 x Booklets produced produced by the Department of Nutrition and Dietetic in Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, and the Diabetes and Nutritional Sciences Division at King's College London. These booklets have been produced by dietitians and are commonly used in clinical practice across the UK. They contain the following information:
Group 2: Patients will be asked to download an application on their mobile phones or tablets. This application has been produced by dietitians from the Department of Nutrition and Dietetic in Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, and the Diabetes and Nutritional Sciences Division at King's College London.
Group 3:Patients will attend a clinic visit for a one-to-one consultation with a dietitian. As per current clinical practice, the initial visit will last for 1 hour.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE The primary objective is to estimate recruitment and retention rates of patients with IBS receiving different education delivery methods of the low FODMAP diet.
SAMPLE SIZE As this is a feasibility study, a formal sample size calculation is not appropriate. For such feasibility studies, sample sizes between 24 and 50 have been recommended. Therefore, for this study, a total sample size of 45 was chosen (15 patients per group). Previous work indicates an approximately 12% attrition rate and, therefore, the final sample size will be 50 patients.
ANALYSIS Descriptive statistics such as mean values, standard deviations (SD) for continuous variables, and counts (percentages) and confidence intervals (CI) for categorical variables will be calculated. To assess recruitment and retention rates the following will be recorded: number of people directly contacting the researchers for the study, number of participants pre-screened and screened, number of participants randomised, number of drop-outs.
ETHICS AND REGULATORY APPROVALS The trial will be conducted in compliance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (1996), the principles of Good Clinical Practice. Ethical approval for this study has been granted by an NRES Committee London.
DATA HANDLING
The Chief Investigator will act as custodian for the trial data. The following guidelines will be strictly adhered to:
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: Baseline visit (Day 0)
Recruitment rate of patients receiving different education delivery methods of the low FODMAP diet.
Time frame: Follow-up visit (week 4)
Retention rate of patients receiving different education delivery methods of the low FODMAP diet.
Time frame: Follow-up visit (week 4)
Compliance rates to the diet within the study groups assessed via a 7day food and drink diary
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Follow-up visit (week 4)
Satisfaction over the education methods and diet, assessed via 5-point Likert scales (1=Strongly Agree, 2=Agree, 3=Neutral, 4=Disagree, 5=Strongly Disagree)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Follow-up visit (week 4)
Perceived appropriateness of the education methods, assessed via 5-point Likert scales (1=Strongly Agree, 2=Agree, 3=Neutral, 4=Disagree, 5=Strongly Disagree)
Time frame: Follow-up visit (week 4)
Assessed via a 5-point Likert scale (1=Strongly Agree, 2=Agree, 3=Neutral, 4=Disagree, 5=Strongly Disagree)
Time frame: Follow-up visit (week 4)
Assessed via a question on whether they would like to have been randomised to a different group (Yes/No)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Follow-up visit (week 4)
Validated Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Severity Scoring System (IBS-SSS) questionnaire. The questionnaire includes four VAS items evaluating abdominal pain frequency and intensity, abdominal distension, satisfaction with bowel habit, and quality of life. Scores are then added up; scoring allows categorisation of patients into mild (75-174), moderate (175-300) and severe (>300) cases, with a maximum achievable severity score of 500 points. A minimal clinically important difference of a 50-point reduction in score allows meaningful interpretation of score change over time.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Follow-up visit (week 4)
Validated Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Quality of Life (IBS-QoL) questionnaire. Each item utilises a 5-point Likert response scale, which is transformed to a 0-100 point scale and subscale scores are then calculated (dysphoria, interference with activity, body image, health worry, food avoidance, social reaction, sexual, relationships). A total score can be calculated by summing the subscale scores. A score of 100 denotes maximum QOL for subscales and the total score.
Time frame: Baseline and follow-up visitBaseline (Day 0) and Follow-up visit (week 4)
Assessed using Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS). Gastrointestinal symptoms (Abdominal discomfort or pain, Heartburn, Acid reflux, nausea, abdominal gurgling, bloating, burping, flatulence, constipation, diarrhoea, loos stools, hard stools, urgency, incomplete evacuation, tiredness, overall symptoms) are rated in a 4-point Likert scale (0=Absent, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, 3=Severe). Descriptive and inferential statistical results are presented for each individual symptom seperately.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Follow-up visit (week 4)
Assessed using the "adequate relief of IBS symptoms" question (IBS-AR). The outcome is dischotomous (Yes/No) and counts/percentages that have reported adequate relief ("Yes") will be presented.
Time frame: Screening (Week -1), Baseline (Day 0) and Follow-up visit (week 4)
The results of this study will be used to inform the sample size calculation of a future larger study if needed. The outcome that will be used for the sample size calculation depends on the which the primary outcome of the future study will be. The mean and standard deviation generated from this study will be used for the sample size of the future trial.
King's College London
Other
A Feasibility Study on Different Health Education Delivery Methods for a Low Fermentable Carbohydrate (FODMAP) Diet in Patients With Functional Bowel Disorders
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03823742
Colonic Diseases, Colonic Diseases, Functional
Houston, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06338189
Colonic Diseases, Colonic Diseases, Functional
Ipswich, Suffolk, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT07522255
Bloating, Colonic Diseases
Bangkok Noi, Bangkok, Thailand
View Trial DetailsNCT07722572
Anxiety Disorders, Colonic Diseases
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details