Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University
Bangkok Noi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand
NCT Number: NCT07522255
This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial will evaluate whether a 14-day course of rifaximin improves bloating in adult patients with Rome IV functional bowel disorders in whom bloating is the predominant symptom. Eligible participants with irritable bowel syndrome, functional constipation, or functional abdominal bloating/distension and bothersome bloating despite adequate bowel movement management will be assigned in a 1:1 ratio to rifaximin 550 mg three times daily or matching placebo for 2 weeks. The primary endpoint is the proportion of participants with bloating response, defined as at least a 1-point reduction from baseline in a 7-point Likert bloating score at the end of treatment.
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified18 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Bangkok Noi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand
Abdominal bloating is a common and bothersome symptom in disorders of gut-brain interaction, especially irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), functional constipation (FC), and functional abdominal bloating/distension (FAB/D). Current treatment options provide inconsistent benefit, in part because bloating is likely mediated by multiple mechanisms, including altered motility, visceral hypersensitivity, abnormal fermentation, and intestinal microbiota alterations.
Rifaximin is a minimally absorbed oral antibiotic with microbiota-modulating and anti-inflammatory effects. It is effective for IBS with diarrhea and has shown benefit for bloating in prior randomized studies and meta-analyses, but data focused specifically on bloating-predominant functional bowel disorders across Rome IV subgroups remain limited. This trial is designed to test whether rifaximin improves bloating symptoms beyond placebo in a broader population with bloating-predominant functional bowel disorders.
Participants will be randomized in blocks of 4, with stratification by functional bowel disorder subgroup, to receive rifaximin or matching placebo for 14 days in a double-blind parallel-group design. Baseline and post-treatment assessments will include symptom severity, bowel habits, disease-specific quality of life, psychological symptom scores, stool microbiota profiling using 16S rRNA sequencing, and lactulose hydrogen/methane breath testing. Rescue medications will be permitted for breakthrough symptoms and recorded in a daily diary.
The study will evaluate both symptom efficacy and mechanistic outcomes. In addition to the primary bloating responder endpoint, prespecified analyses will assess abdominal pain, disease-specific symptom scales, bowel movement frequency, Bristol Stool Form Scale, quality-of-life measures, psychiatric symptoms, treatment satisfaction, stool microbiota changes, breath test gas production, rescue medication use, and baseline factors associated with treatment response.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants randomized to this arm receive rifaximin 550 mg orally three times daily for 2 weeks. Allocation is randomized and double-blinded.
Matching placebo administered orally three times daily for 14 days.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks
Bloating responder is defined as at least a 1-point reduction from baseline to week 2 in bloating symptom severity measured using a 7-point Likert scale for bothersomeness of bloating (range 0 to 6; higher scores indicate worse symptoms). Score categories are 0 = not at all, 1 = hardly, 2 = somewhat, 3 = moderately, 4 = a good deal, 5 = a great deal, and 6 = a very great deal.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks
Abdominal pain responder is defined as at least a 1-point reduction from baseline to week 2 in abdominal pain severity measured using a 7-point Likert scale for bothersomeness of abdominal pain (range 0 to 6; higher scores indicate worse symptoms). Score categories are 0 = not at all, 1 = hardly, 2 = somewhat, 3 = moderately, 4 = a good deal, 5 = a great deal, and 6 = a very great deal.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks
Change in IBS Symptom Severity Score (IBS-SSS) from baseline, assessing overall IBS symptom burden, abdominal pain, bloating, and bowel habit changes. The IBS-SSS scale ranges from 0 to 500, with higher scores indicating more severe IBS symptoms.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks
Change in Patient Assessment of Constipation-Symptoms (PAC-SYM) score, evaluating constipation-related symptoms, including stool consistency, discomfort, and straining. The PAC-SYM scale ranges from 0 to 48, with higher scores indicating worse constipation symptoms.
Time frame: End of treatment at 2 weeks
Overall treatment satisfaction, measured using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10:
0 = Completely Dissatisfied 10 = Completely Satisfied Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction with treatment. The difference between baseline and post-intervention scores will be analyzed.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks
Change in Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scores (DASS-21), a validated self-reported scale measuring psychological distress. The DASS-21 consists of three subscales:
Depression (0-21) Anxiety (0-21) Stress (0-21) Each subscale score ranges from 0 (normal) to 21 (severe symptoms), with higher scores indicating greater psychological distress. The total score is calculated by summing individual subscale scores.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks
Change in IBS-specific Quality of Life (IBS-QoL) score, which assesses the impact of IBS on daily activities, emotional well-being, and social functioning.
The IBS-QoL score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks
Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life questionnaire (PAC-QoL). The PAC-QoL is a 28-item patient-reported questionnaire assessing constipation-related quality of life over the previous 2 weeks. The overall score is typically reported as the mean item score and ranges from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating worse constipation-related quality of life.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks
The quality of life of patients with FAB/D was measure with 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). The SF-36 assesses health-related quality of life across 8 domains: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health, role limitations due to emotional problems, energy/fatigue, emotional well-being, social functioning, pain, and general health. Each domain score is transformed to a 0 to 100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks
Change from baseline in stool microbiota alpha diversity, beta diversity, and taxonomic abundance measured by 16S rRNA sequencing.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks
Change from baseline in hydrogen gas production measured in part per million unit during lactulose hydrogen breath testing.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks
Change from baseline in methane gas production measured in part per million unit during lactulose hydrogen breath testing.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks
A positive lactulose hydrogen breath test is defined as either a rise in breath hydrogen of 20 ppm or more above baseline within 90 minutes or a breath methane concentration of 10 ppm or more at any time during the test after ingestion of 10 g lactulose. Breath samples are collected every 15 to 30 minutes for up to 180 minutes. Higher proportions indicate a worse outcome (more abnormal breath test results).
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks
Frequency and dose of rescue medications used for breakthrough symptoms during the treatment period.
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks
Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events.
Time frame: Baseline predictor with treatment response assessed at 2 weeks
Exploratory analysis of whether baseline bloating symptom severity predicts treatment response. Baseline bloating symptom severity is assessed using a 7-point Likert scale for bothersomeness of bloating (score range 0 to 6; higher scores indicate worse symptoms). The association between baseline score and bloating responder status at 2 weeks will be evaluated using logistic regression and reported as an odds ratio. Bloating responder is defined as at least a 1-point reduction from baseline in bloating symptom severity score.
Time frame: Baseline predictor with treatment response assessed at 2 weeks
Exploratory analysis of whether baseline fecal microbiota alpha diversity predicts treatment response. Baseline stool microbiota is assessed using 16S rRNA sequencing. Alpha diversity will be assessed using the Shannon diversity index. The association between baseline Shannon diversity index and bloating responder status at 2 weeks will be evaluated using logistic regression and reported as an odds ratio. Bloating responder is defined as at least a 1-point reduction from baseline in bloating symptom severity score.
Time frame: Baseline predictor with treatment response assessed at 2 weeks.
Exploratory analysis of whether baseline small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) status predicts treatment response. Baseline SIBO status will be assessed using a lactulose hydrogen-methane breath test after ingestion of 10 g lactulose, with breath samples collected every 15 to 30 minutes for up to 180 minutes. A positive SIBO diagnosis is defined as a rise in breath hydrogen of 20 parts per million or more above baseline within 90 minutes. The association between baseline positive SIBO status (yes/no) and bloating responder status at 2 weeks will be evaluated using logistic regression and reported as an odds ratio. Bloating responder is defined as at least a 1-point reduction from baseline in bloating symptom severity score.
Time frame: Baseline predictor with treatment response assessed at 2 weeks.
Exploratory analysis of whether baseline intestinal methanogen overgrowth (IMO) status predicts treatment response. Baseline IMO status will be assessed using a lactulose hydrogen-methane breath test after ingestion of 10 g lactulose, with breath samples collected every 15 to 30 minutes for up to 180 minutes. A positive IMO diagnosis is defined as a breath methane concentration of 10 parts per million or more at any time during the test. The association between baseline positive IMO status (yes/no) and bloating responder status at 2 weeks will be evaluated using logistic regression and reported as an odds ratio. Bloating responder is defined as at least a 1-point reduction from baseline in bloating symptom severity score.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Monthira Maneerattanaporn, M.D.
CONTACT
Pubet Weeranawin, M.D.
CONTACT
Mahidol University
Other
The Effect of Rifaximin Treatment in Bloating Predominant Functional Bowel Disorders: A Randomized Double-blind Placebo-Controlled Trial With Gut Microbiota and Intestinal Gas Analysis
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06827977
Bloating, Connective Tissue Diseases
Houston, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07215351
Bloating, Constipation
Memphis, Tennessee, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06755671
Abdominal Pain, Anorexia
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
View Trial DetailsNCT06755424
Bloating, Constipation
Zwolle, Overijssel, Netherlands
View Trial Details