Hereditary Transthyretin Amyloidosis Polyneuropathy in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome in Russia
NCT06414746
Amyloidosis, Amyloidosis, Hereditary, Transthyretin-Related
Arkhangelsk, Russia
View Trial DetailsNCT Number: NCT06365593
A multicenter observational retrosPective Registry of patIents with transthyretin aMyloid polynEuropathy (hATTR-PN) and chRonic idiopathic axonal polyneuropathy (CIAP) in the population of the Russian Federation (PRIMER) There are no comprehensive epidemiological data on patients with hereditary ATTR-PN (hATTR-PN) and CIAP in the Russian Federation. Therefore, there is a need to conduct a large-scale observational study in the Russian population to obtain information on clinical, electrophysiological and demographic characteristics of patients with hATTR-PN and CIAP. Obtaining the study data will help to identify the patients with axonal polyneuropathy, who deserve TTR gene sequencing, and therefore to allow early treatment and potentially modify disease progression in patients.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeAll sexes
Observational
Research Site, Kazan', Russia
Since the increasing number of treatments available to help slow the progression of neuropathy it is critical to timely identify and diagnose the ATTR-PN. Early identification and intervention are also crucial to improve patient outcomes because newly available treatments have been shown to have maximum therapeutic benefit when started in the early stages of the disease.
Identification of ATTRv amyloidosis with PN can be challenging, particularly in non-endemic regions, and a high level of suspicion is required to diagnose patients as early as possible.
Previously proposed suspicion index of ATTRv amyloidosis was based on disease's red flags, that is, on the presence of a progressive polyneuropathy in addition to at least one red flag symptom suggestive of multi-systemic involvement. However, sometimes the demonstration of a progressive neuropathy requires follow-up evaluations, risking wasting time. Moreover, some red flags (e.g., cardiomyopathy or vitreous opacities) need specialist evaluations that could be often lacking during the first neurological evaluation.
Patients can present with heterogeneous symptoms and variable levels of disease severity, which often leads to a misdiagnosis. Early and accurate diagnosis may also be confounded by a lack of family history and the presence of various phenotypes common to multiple disease conditions such as GI disorders. In fact, CIAP still represents a common misdiagnosis for ATTRv patients.
Study is planned to determine the principal differences between the hATTR-PN and CIAP patients and valorize them in a compound score which can help clinician through a specific cut-off to recognize patients deserving TTR genetic analysis. The application of the compound score in patients with sensory-motor neuropathy may have a major role, representing a screening tool to avoiding wasting time and therefore shortening the time to reach a correct diagnosis.
Previously reported compound score included presence of muscle weakness and CTS history as clinical parameters and amplitude of Sensory action potential (SAP), Compound muscular action potential (CMAP) of the median and ulnar nerves, CMAP of the tibial nerve as electrophysiological parameters. Electrophysiological findings in this study showed that ATTRv patients, although they had the same disease duration of CIAP patients, had a greater reduction of amplitude of potentials in all nerves with a more frequently absence of potential at lower limbs and reduction at upper limbs.
At the same time, the landscape of mutations and phenotypes of ATTR amyloidosis are very different between countries, which does not allow extrapolating the results from Italian study, and there are no comprehensive epidemiological data on patients with hATTR-PN and CIAP in the Russian Federation.
Therefore, there is a need to conduct a large-scale observational study in the Russian population to obtain information on clinical, electrophysiological and demographic characteristics of patients with hATTR-PN and CIAP. Obtaining the study data will help to identify the patients with axonal polyneuropathy, who deserve TTR gene sequencing, and therefore to allow early treatment and potentially modify disease progression in patients.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: up to 5 months
Time frame: up to 5 months
Time frame: up to 5 months
Time frame: up to 5 months
Time frame: up to 5 months
Mean height (in m and cm), body weight (in kg), BMI (kg/m2)
Time frame: up to 5 months
BMI <18,5 kg/m2
Time frame: up to 5 months
Time frame: up to 5 months
Time frame: up to 5 months
Time frame: up to 5 months
Time frame: up to 5 months
Time frame: up to 5 months
Time frame: up to 5 months
(positive, negative, not performed); the proportion of patients with each identified mutation in TTR gene in case of positive result
Time frame: up to 5 months
Time frame: up to 5 months
Time frame: up to 5 months
Time frame: up to 5 months
Time frame: up to 5 months
Time frame: up to 5 months
Time frame: up to 5 months
Time frame: up to 5 months
Compound muscular action potential (CMAP) (mV) of the median, ulnar, tibial and peroneal nerves; (b) (Distal motor latency) DML (ms) of the median, ulnar, tibial and peroneal nerves; (c) (Motor nerve conduction velocity) MNCV (m/s) of the median, ulnar, tibial and peroneal nerves; (d) Sensory action potential (SAP) (μV) of the median, ulnar, peroneal superficial and sural nerves; (e) Sensory nerve conduction velocity (SNCV) (m/s) of the median, ulnar, peroneal superficial and sural nerves
Time frame: up to 5 months
Time frame: up to 5 months
Time frame: up to 5 months
based on CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration) formula
Time frame: up to 5 months
Time frame: up to 5 months
Time frame: up to 5 months
Time frame: up to 5 months
Time frame: up to 5 months
Time frame: Up to 5 months
In order to achieve secondary objective all above baseline demographic, electrophysiological and clinical characteristics will be compared between groups (hATTR-PN and CIAP arm). The score will be arranged based on the parameters by which a significant difference will be determined based on the results of the comparison.
Time frame: during retrospective follow-up period
Time frame: during retrospective follow-up period
at visit 2 (in comparison to baseline) and at visit 3 (in comparison to visit 2)
Time frame: during retrospective follow-up period
at visit 2 (in comparison to baseline) and at visit 3 (in comparison to visit 2)
Time frame: during retrospective follow-up period
Time frame: during retrospective follow-up period
Time frame: from the date of diagnosis till the end of retrospective follow-up period
Time frame: from the date of diagnosis till the end of retrospective follow-up period
Time frame: from the date of diagnosis till the end of retrospective follow-up period
Time frame: from the date of diagnosis till the end of retrospective follow-up period
Time frame: during retrospective follow-up period
Time frame: during retrospective follow-up period
Time frame: during retrospective follow-up period
(total score, arm disability, leg disability)
Time frame: during retrospective follow-up period
Time frame: during retrospective follow-up period
Time frame: during retrospective follow-up period
Time frame: during retrospective follow-up period
Mean changes in CMAP, DML, MNCV of the median, ulnar, tibial and peroneal nerves, SAP and SNCV of the median, ulnar, peroneal superficial and sural nerves
Time frame: during retrospective follow-up period
Time frame: during retrospective follow-up period
Time frame: during retrospective follow-up period
Time frame: during retrospective follow-up period
Time frame: during retrospective follow-up period
Time frame: during retrospective follow-up period
Time frame: from the date of diagnosis till the end of retrospective follow-up period
Time frame: from the date of diagnosis till the end of retrospective follow-up period
Time frame: from the date of diagnosis till the end of retrospective follow-up period
AstraZeneca
Industry
A Multicenter Observational retrosPective Registry of patIents With Transthyretin aMyloid polynEuropathy (hATTR-PN) and chRonic Idiopathic Axonal Polyneuropathy (CIAP) in the Population of the Russian Federation
Acronym: PRIMER
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06414746
Amyloidosis, Amyloidosis, Hereditary, Transthyretin-Related
Arkhangelsk, Russia
View Trial DetailsNCT06907186
Amyloidosis, Hereditary, Transthyretin-Related, Hereditary Transthyretin Amyloidosis
Pavia, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT05929209
Amyloidosis, Hereditary, Transthyretin-Related, Hereditary Transthyretin Amyloidosis
Roma, ID, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT05023889
Amyloid Neuropathies, Amyloid Neuropathies, Familial
Austin, Texas, United States
View Trial Details