Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03079713

Handheld Vibrator Versus Topical Eye Drops as Anesthesia for Intravitreal Injections

Intravitreal injections are an efficient method of delivering therapeutic levels of medications to the posterior segment of the eye. Prior to receiving an injection, there are various methods to provide ocular anesthesia. Vibration may have an anti-nociceptive effect by directly decreasing the sensitivity of peripheral nociceptors or by reducing signal transmission from peripheral nociceptors to the brain with activation of vibratory sensation pathways. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of a handheld fingertip vibrator compared to topical eye drops for pain control while performing intravitreal eye injections. A secondary objective of the study is to measure corneal and conjunctiva sensitivity with and without activation of the vibrator to the lower lid using a Luneau Cochet-Bonnet aesthesiometer.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

MidAtlantic Retina-Wills Eye Hospital

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107, United States

About this study

A total of 80 patients will be recruited for part 1 of the study. Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to a standard anesthetic group or standard anesthetic with vibration groups. All intravitreal drugs will be delivered via 30 gauge needles through the pars plana in the inferotemporal quadrant 3.5 to 4 mm posterior to the limbus. Once recruited, a single eye requiring injection for each enrolled patient will be randomized into 1 of 2 groups: aesthesiometer measurement alone with sham vibration (vibrator will not be triggered) (Group 1) or handheld vibrator application and triggering followed by aesthesiometer measurement (Group 2). The vibrator will be applied to the lower eyelid while retracting it during standard intravitreal injection prepped with topical anesthetic (Proparacaine 1%) and Betadine. The main outcome measure of will be patient comfort, as measured by the patient using a standardized Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale.

An additional 30 eyes of 30 healthy patients not requiring intravitreal injection will be recruited to determine the effect of vibrator application and triggering to the lower lid on corneal and conjunctival (inferotemporal quadrant) sensation as measured using an aesthesiometer. No topical anesthetic will be applied prior to esthesiometry measurements are taken with and without vibration triggering.

All patient identifying information will be removed and patients will be identified with a random number. Data will be checked regularly by a data monitoring committee. Patient records will be reviewed and the following data will be collected: demographic data (age, gender, injected eye, reason for injection), best-corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure, and complications/adverse events associated with intravitreal injections. Statistical analyses will include univariate comparisons between treatment groups using the Student t-test for continuous variables and χ2 test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinical diagnosis of neovascular age related macular degeneration requiring anti-VEGF intravitreal injection in the routine course of their care

Exclusion criteria

  • History of endophthalmitis, prior ocular surgery except cataract surgery, globe rupture, retinal detachment, neurotrophic keratopathy, a history of corneal epithelial basement membrane dystrophy, recent corneal abrasion or trauma, history of infectious keratitis, lower eyelid pathology, those with a previously documented hypersensitivity to ophthalmic 5% povidone-iodine solution (Betadine; Alcon Labs, Fort Worth, TX) or inability to grade pain using the pain scale, pregnant patients, institutionalized patients (nursing home residents, prisoners), those with a history of diabetes

Treatment and study plan

Handheld vibrator triggered during intravitreal injection for wet ARMD

Device

A vibratory device cleaned with alcohol swabs between each use will be attached to the injectors' finger, placed on the lower eyelid of the treatment eye, and triggered during intravitreal injection

Normal eye esthesiometry with and without vibration

Device

Healthy patients will undergo corneal and conjunctival esthesiometry with and without triggering of the wearable vibrator placed upon the lower lid of a single eye.

Handheld vibrator not triggered during intravitreal injection for wet ARMD

Device

Control group undergoing standard intravitreal injection without triggering of the vibrator.

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain assessment

    Time frame: Immediately after intravitreal injection

    Pain is assessed by Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale (score ranging from 0 to 10) immediately after the intravitreal injection

Secondary outcomes

  1. Corneal and conjunctival sensitivity

    Time frame: immediately after application of a handheld vibrator

    Corneal and conjunctival sensitivity, as measured using an aesthesiometer

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Wills Eye

Other

Collaborators

  • Mid Atlantic Retina

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of Handheld Vibrator to Topical Eye Drops as Anesthesia for Intravitreal Injections

Acronym: Eyebrator

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2019
First posted
Mar 14, 2017
Registry last updated
May 9, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.