Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03048123

HAIC Versus TACE for Large and Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Staged BCLC A/B

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) compared with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with large and unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma staged BCLC A/B.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Cancer Center Sun Yat-sen University

Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, China

About this study

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the most widely used palliative treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. While a number of studies demonstrate poor effect of TACE for patients with large hepatocellular carcinoma staged BCLC A/B. Our previous prospective study also revealed similar results of large HCC patients treated with TACE. Recently, the results of our preliminary pilot study suggested that, compared with TACE, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) may improve tumor response for HCC with large HCC.

Thus, the investigators carried out this prospective nonrandomized control to demonstrate the superiority of HAIC over TACE.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age range from 18-75 years;
  • KPS≥70;
  • The diagnosis of HCC was based on the diagnostic criteria for HCC used by the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), simultaneously staged as BCLC A or BCLC B based on Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system.
  • Patients must have at least one tumor lesion that can be accurately measured;
  • Solitary tumor with diameter ≥10cm, invaded both left and right lobe; or multiple tumors, diameter of the largest was more than 7cm.
  • Diagnosed as unresectable with consensus by the panel of liver surgery experts;
  • Re commanded treated by TAI or TACE with consensus by the panel of liver MDT;
  • No past history of TACE, TAI, chemotherapy or molecule-targeted treatment;
  • No Cirrhosis or cirrhotic status of Child-Pugh class A only
  • No liver protection therapy in 2 weeks before enrolled, and meet the following laboratory parameters:(a) Platelet count ≥ 75,000/μL; (b)Hemoglobin ≥ 8.5 g/dL;(c) Total bilirubin ≤ 30mmol/L;(d) Serum albumin

≥ 32 g/L;(e) ASL and AST ≤ 6 x upper limit of normal;(f) Serum creatinine

≤ 1.5 x upper limit of normal;(g) INR > 2.3 or PT/APTT within normal limits; (h) Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >1,500/mm3;

  • Ability to understand the protocol and to agree to and sign a written informed consent document.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with clinically significant gastrointestinal bleeding within 30 days prior to study entry.
  • Known of serious heart disease which can nor endure the treatment such as cardiac ventricular arrhythmias requiring anti-arrhythmic therapy
  • Evidence of hepatic decompensation including ascites, gastrointestinal bleeding or hepatic encephalopathy
  • Known history of HIV
  • History of organ allograft
  • Known or suspected allergy to the investigational agents or any agent given in association with this trial.
  • Evidence of bleeding diathesis.
  • Any other hemorrhage/bleeding event > CTCAE Grade 3 within 4 weeks of first dose of study drug
  • Serious non-healing wound, ulcer, or bone fracture
  • Known central nervous system tumors including metastatic brain disease
  • Poor compliance that can not comply with the course of treatment and follow up.

Treatment and study plan

Hepatic arterial infusion

Procedure

A standard hepatic artery catheter was introduced via the femoral artery percutaneously. Selective catheterization of the proper hepatic artery was performed using standard diagnostic catheters and fluoroscopic guidance. In the event of multiple arterial supply(including superior-mesenteric artery), the proportion of the liver supplied by each artery was estimated by the arteriogram. After optimal positioning of the catheter in dominant supplying artery to ensure minimal reflux, the catheter was fixed and connected with infusion tube. In the condition of multiple tumors on both left and right lobe, the gastroduodenal artery was embolized and the catheter was positioned in the hepatic proper artery for infusion. Folfox Protocol were infused through the fixed catheter sequentially

Transarterial chemoembolization

Procedure

Previous procedure was same with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy. After optimal positioning of the catheter, TACE Drug Protocol were injected.

Folfox Protocol

Drug

oxaliplatin,leucovorin and 5-FU

Other names: Folfox for TAI

TACE Drug Protocol

Drug

lipiodol mixed with chemotherapy drugs(EADM , lobaplatin, and MMC) followed by polyvinyl alcohol particles (PVA)

Other names: Drugs for transarterial chemotherapy and embolization

Primary outcomes

  1. Disease control rate

    Time frame: 16 months

    Best response based on RECIST

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to progression

    Time frame: 16 months

  2. Adverse Events

    Time frame: 30 Days after HAIC and TACE

    Postoperative adverse events were graded based on CTCAE v4.03

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Sun Yat-sen University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

The Efficacy and Safety of Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Compared With Transarterial Chemoembolization in Patients With Large and Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Staged BCLC A/B

Important dates

Study start
2015
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2017
First posted
Feb 9, 2017
Registry last updated
Feb 9, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.