HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device
DeviceImplantation of device for aortic valve repair
NCT Number: NCT01400841
This investigation is a prospective, non-randomized, multi-center trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the HAART model 300 annuloplasty ring when used to surgically repair a leaking aortic valve using a 3-D intra-annular mounting frame
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me50 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
Aortic Regurgitation, (also known as Aortic Insufficiency; AI), is the failure of the aortic valve to close completely during diastole which causes blood to flow from the aorta back into the left ventricle. Aortic Regurgitation (AR) is a frequent cause of both disability and death due to congestive heart failure, primarily in individuals forty or older, but can also occur in younger populations.
Traditionally management of aortic regurgitation has been by aortic valve replacement, however, as has been observed in patients who have had mitral valve repair, the option of maintaining ones native aortic valve versus a replacement, either bioprosthetic or mechanical, can have added multiple benefits. The advantage of repair is the avoidance of prosthetic valve-related complications with bioprosthetic valves over 10-15 years or the need for anticoagulation with mechanical valves and the related problems of this therapy. Therefore, potentially aortic valve repair is a good option for patients with AR or AI.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Implantation of device for aortic valve repair
Time frame: 1 month postprocedure
Event-free survival is defined as survival free from device-related death
Time frame: 2 years postprocedure (extended follow-up)
Event-free survival is defined as survival free from device-related death
Time frame: 6 months postprocedure
Aortic valvular regurgitation assessed by transthoracic echocardiography and graded as None/Trace (0), Mild (1+), Moderate (2+), Moderate-to-Severe (3+), or Severe (4+)
Time frame: 2 years postprocedure (extended follow-up)
Aortic valvular regurgitation assessed by transthoracic echocardiography and graded as None/Trace (0), Mild (1+), Moderate (2+), Moderate-to-Severe (3+), or Severe (4+)
Time frame: discharge or 14 days postprocedure, whichever comes first
Success is defined as the absence of specified adverse events evaluated through discharge or 14 days after the procedure:
Time frame: 2 years postprocedure (extended follow-up)
Success is defined as the absence of specified adverse events evaluated through discharge or 14 days after the procedure:
Time frame: 1 month postprocedure
Freedom from specified clinical cardiovascular events 1 month postprocedure:
Time frame: 2 years postprocedure
Freedom from specified clinical cardiovascular events 2 years postprocedure:
Time frame: 6 months postprocedure
Event-free survival is defined as survival free from device-related death
Time frame: 6 months postprocedure
Four classes describing the effect of cardiac disease on physical activity: Class I - disease does not limit activity; Class II - slight limitation; Class III - marked limitation; Class IV - inability to carry out any physical activity without discomfort
Time frame: 2 years postprocedure (extended follow-up)
Four classes describing the effect of cardiac disease on physical activity: Class I - disease does not limit activity; Class II - slight limitation; Class III - marked limitation; Class IV - inability to carry out any physical activity without discomfort
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months postprocedure
Transthoracic echocardiography parameter
Time frame: Baseline, 2 years postprocedure (extended follow-up)
Transthoracic echocardiography parameter
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months postprocedure
Transthoracic echocardiography parameter
Time frame: Baseline, 2 years postprocedure (extended follow-up)
Transthoracic echocardiography parameter
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months postprocedure
Left ventricular mass. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
Time frame: Baseline, 2 years postprocedure (extended follow-up)
Left ventricular mass. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months postprocedure
Left ventricular internal dimension. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
Time frame: Baseline, 2 years postprocedure (extended follow-up)
Left ventricular internal dimension. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months postprocedure
Left ventricular internal dimension. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
Time frame: Baseline, 2 years postprocedure (extended follow-up)
Left ventricular internal dimension. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months postprocedure
Left ventricular diastolic volume. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
Time frame: Baseline, 2 years postprocedure (extended follow-up)
Left ventricular diastolic volume. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months postprocedure
Left ventricular systolic volume. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
Time frame: Baseline, 2 years postprocedure (extended follow-up)
Left ventricular systolic volume. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months postprocedure
Left ventricular ejection fraction. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
Time frame: Baseline, 2 years postprocedure (extended follow-up)
Left ventricular ejection fraction. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months postprocedure
Stroke volume x heart rate. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
Time frame: Baseline, 2 years postprocedure (extended follow-up)
Stroke volume x heart rate. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months postprocedure
Hemodynamic parameter computed as cardiac output divided by body surface area
Time frame: Baseline, 2 years postprocedure (extended follow-up)
Hemodynamic parameter computed as cardiac output divided by body surface area
Biostable Science & Engineering
Industry
A Prospective, Non-randomized, Multi-center Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the HAART Model 300 Annuloplasty Ring When Used to Surgically Repair a Leaking Aortic Valve Using a 3-D Intra-annular Mounting Frame
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03466918
Aortic Regurgitation, Aortic Stenosis
Beijing, China
View Trial DetailsNCT06751368
Aortic Regurgitation, Aortic Stenosis, Subvalvular
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT03314857
Aortic Regurgitation, Aortic Stenosis
Sichuan, Chengdu, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05515848
Aneurysm, Aortic Aneurysm
Nantes, France
View Trial Details