Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01400841

HAART Model 300 Annuloplasty Ring

This investigation is a prospective, non-randomized, multi-center trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the HAART model 300 annuloplasty ring when used to surgically repair a leaking aortic valve using a 3-D intra-annular mounting frame

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

50 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Aortic Regurgitation, (also known as Aortic Insufficiency; AI), is the failure of the aortic valve to close completely during diastole which causes blood to flow from the aorta back into the left ventricle. Aortic Regurgitation (AR) is a frequent cause of both disability and death due to congestive heart failure, primarily in individuals forty or older, but can also occur in younger populations.

Traditionally management of aortic regurgitation has been by aortic valve replacement, however, as has been observed in patients who have had mitral valve repair, the option of maintaining ones native aortic valve versus a replacement, either bioprosthetic or mechanical, can have added multiple benefits. The advantage of repair is the avoidance of prosthetic valve-related complications with bioprosthetic valves over 10-15 years or the need for anticoagulation with mechanical valves and the related problems of this therapy. Therefore, potentially aortic valve repair is a good option for patients with AR or AI.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • The subject is 50 years old or older
  • The subject has a tricuspid aortic valve morphology
  • Patients with documented severe aortic insufficiency with aortic annular dilation without severe concomitant aortic stenosis
  • Patients referred to center for documented moderate to severe Chronic aortic regurgitation (AR) associated with annular dilatation with or without cusp prolapse of one, two, or all three leaflets
  • Patients with or without Sinotubular Junction (STJ) dilatation or aortic root aneurysms
  • Patients who are free of coronary disease or those with evidence of minor stable (1-2 vessel) coronary disease
  • Subject is willing to comply with specified follow-up evaluations, including transesophageal echocardiography if there are inadequate images by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) to assess the aortic valve
  • The subject has signed the written informed consent
  • The subject agrees to return for all follow-up evaluations for the duration of the study (i.e. geographically stable
  • The subject is New York Hospital Association (NYHA) class II or III

Exclusion criteria

  • The subject has preexisting valve prosthesis in the atrial, the mitral, pulmonary, and/or tricuspid position
  • The subject requires an additional valve replacement
  • The subject's aortic valve morphology is not tricuspid
  • The subject has active endocarditis
  • Heavily calcified valves
  • Valvular retraction with severely reduced mobility
  • The subject has mixed stenosis and regurgitation of the aortic valve with predominant stenosis
  • The subject requires a repair of the mitral or tricuspid valve with the use of an annuloplasty device
  • Leukopenia
  • Acute anemia (Hb < 9mg%)
  • Platelet count <100,000 cell/mm3
  • Need for emergency surgery for any reason
  • History of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy or the subject refuses blood transfusions
  • Active infection requiring antibiotic therapy (if temporary illness, subjects may enroll 4 weeks after discontinuation of antibiotics)
  • Subjects in whom transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is contraindicated
  • Non elective presentation
  • Low Ejection Fraction (EF) EF < 40%
  • Life expectancy < 1 year
  • Rheumatic disease
  • The subject has severe leaflet fenestration or leaflets damaged by endocarditis
  • The subject is or will be participating in a concomitant research study of an investigational product or has participated in such a study within the 30 days prior to screening
  • The subject is a minor, an illicit drug user, alcohol abuser, prisoner, institutionalized, or is unable to give informed consent
  • The subject is pregnant or lactating
  • This patient will not agree to return to the implant center for the required number of follow-up visits or is geographically unavailable for follow-up
  • The subject has not signed and dated the study informed consent
  • Recent (within 6 months) cerebrovascular accident (CVA) or transient ischemic attack (TIA)
  • Myocardial infarction (MI) within one month of trial inclusion
  • Have a known intolerance to titanium or polyester
  • Sole therapy for correction for patients with aortic root aneurysm
  • Subjects requiring simultaneous cardiac procedures
  • The subject has asymptomatic AR and a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) > 50%

Treatment and study plan

HAART 300 Annuloplasty Device

Device

Implantation of device for aortic valve repair

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary Safety Outcome Measure: Event-free Survival

    Time frame: 1 month postprocedure

    Event-free survival is defined as survival free from device-related death

  2. Primary Safety Outcome Measure: Event-free Survival

    Time frame: 2 years postprocedure (extended follow-up)

    Event-free survival is defined as survival free from device-related death

  3. Primary Efficacy Outcome Measure: Aortic Valvular Regurgitation at 6 Months Postprocedure

    Time frame: 6 months postprocedure

    Aortic valvular regurgitation assessed by transthoracic echocardiography and graded as None/Trace (0), Mild (1+), Moderate (2+), Moderate-to-Severe (3+), or Severe (4+)

  4. Primary Efficacy Outcome Measure: Aortic Valvular Regurgitation at 2 Years Postprocedure

    Time frame: 2 years postprocedure (extended follow-up)

    Aortic valvular regurgitation assessed by transthoracic echocardiography and graded as None/Trace (0), Mild (1+), Moderate (2+), Moderate-to-Severe (3+), or Severe (4+)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Implant Procedure Success

    Time frame: discharge or 14 days postprocedure, whichever comes first

    Success is defined as the absence of specified adverse events evaluated through discharge or 14 days after the procedure:

    • Aortic annular dissection, rupture, or leaflet damage
    • Paravalvular leak > +2 or requiring intervention
    • Mitral valve impingement due to implant
    • implant dehiscence/migration into aorta
    • implant dehiscence/migration into left ventricle
    • Hemodynamics requiring intervention
    • Other adverse event resulting in reoperation, explantation, or permanent disability.
  2. Implant Procedure Success

    Time frame: 2 years postprocedure (extended follow-up)

    Success is defined as the absence of specified adverse events evaluated through discharge or 14 days after the procedure:

    • Aortic annular dissection, rupture, or leaflet damage
    • Paravalvular leak > +2 or requiring intervention
    • Mitral valve impingement due to implant
    • implant dehiscence/migration into aorta
    • implant dehiscence/migration into left ventricle
    • Hemodynamics requiring intervention
    • Other adverse event resulting in reoperation, explantation, or permanent disability.
  3. Actuarial Freedom From Clinical Cardiovascular Events

    Time frame: 1 month postprocedure

    Freedom from specified clinical cardiovascular events 1 month postprocedure:

    • Device-related mortality
    • Complete heart block
    • Structural device failure
    • Endocarditis
    • Periprosthetic leak or dehiscence
    • Thromboembolism
    • Bleeding Event
    • Native Valve Deterioration
    • Valve Thrombosis
    • Hemolysis
    • Reoperation and explant at 1 month
  4. Actuarial Freedom From Clinical Cardiovascular Events

    Time frame: 2 years postprocedure

    Freedom from specified clinical cardiovascular events 2 years postprocedure:

    • Device-related mortality
    • Complete heart block
    • Structural device failure
    • Endocarditis
    • Periprosthetic leak or dehiscence
    • Thromboembolism
    • Bleeding Event
    • Native Valve Deterioration
    • Valve Thrombosis
    • Hemolysis
    • Reoperation and explant at 2 years
  5. Event-free Survival

    Time frame: 6 months postprocedure

    Event-free survival is defined as survival free from device-related death

  6. New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Capacity Classification

    Time frame: 6 months postprocedure

    Four classes describing the effect of cardiac disease on physical activity: Class I - disease does not limit activity; Class II - slight limitation; Class III - marked limitation; Class IV - inability to carry out any physical activity without discomfort

  7. New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Capacity Classification

    Time frame: 2 years postprocedure (extended follow-up)

    Four classes describing the effect of cardiac disease on physical activity: Class I - disease does not limit activity; Class II - slight limitation; Class III - marked limitation; Class IV - inability to carry out any physical activity without discomfort

  8. Peak Gradient - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months postprocedure

    Transthoracic echocardiography parameter

  9. Peak Gradient - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline, 2 years postprocedure (extended follow-up)

    Transthoracic echocardiography parameter

  10. Mean Gradient - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months postprocedure

    Transthoracic echocardiography parameter

  11. Mean Gradient - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline, 2 years postprocedure (extended follow-up)

    Transthoracic echocardiography parameter

  12. LV Mass - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months postprocedure

    Left ventricular mass. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

  13. LV Mass - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline, 2 years postprocedure (extended follow-up)

    Left ventricular mass. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

  14. LVID Diastole - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months postprocedure

    Left ventricular internal dimension. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

  15. LVID Diastole - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline, 2 years postprocedure (extended follow-up)

    Left ventricular internal dimension. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

  16. LVID Systole - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months postprocedure

    Left ventricular internal dimension. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

  17. LVID Systole - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline, 2 years postprocedure (extended follow-up)

    Left ventricular internal dimension. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

  18. LV Diastolic Volume - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months postprocedure

    Left ventricular diastolic volume. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

  19. LV Diastolic Volume - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline, 2 years postprocedure (extended follow-up)

    Left ventricular diastolic volume. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

  20. LV Systolic Volume - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months postprocedure

    Left ventricular systolic volume. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

  21. LV Systolic Volume - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline, 2 years postprocedure (extended follow-up)

    Left ventricular systolic volume. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

  22. LVEF - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months postprocedure

    Left ventricular ejection fraction. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

  23. LVEF - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline, 2 years postprocedure (extended follow-up)

    Left ventricular ejection fraction. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

  24. Cardiac Output - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months postprocedure

    Stroke volume x heart rate. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

  25. Cardiac Output - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline, 2 years postprocedure (extended follow-up)

    Stroke volume x heart rate. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

  26. Cardiac Index - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months postprocedure

    Hemodynamic parameter computed as cardiac output divided by body surface area

  27. Cardiac Index - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline, 2 years postprocedure (extended follow-up)

    Hemodynamic parameter computed as cardiac output divided by body surface area

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Biostable Science & Engineering

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Prospective, Non-randomized, Multi-center Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the HAART Model 300 Annuloplasty Ring When Used to Surgically Repair a Leaking Aortic Valve Using a 3-D Intra-annular Mounting Frame

Important dates

Study start
2012
Primary completion
2013
Study completion
2014
First posted
Jul 22, 2011
Registry last updated
Jan 13, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.