HAART 200 Aortic Valve Annuloplasty Device
DeviceSurgical repair of bicuspid aortic valve using the HAART 200 Aortic Valve Annuloplasty Device .
NCT Number: NCT02071849
The HAART 200 "Aortic Annuloplasty during Bicuspid Aortic Valve Reconstruction" Trial is a prospective, non-randomized, multi-center trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the HAART 200 bicuspid annuloplasty ring when used to surgically stabilize the aortic valve annulus in patients undergoing repair of bicuspid aortic valves (BAV) for predominant aortic insufficiency (AI).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
München Heart Center, München, Bavaria, Germany
Aortic valve disease is the most common valvular heart disease with approximately 200,000 patients per year undergoing conventional aortic valve replacement in North America and Europe. Around 60% of valves have Aortic Stenosis (AS) and 40% of have Aortic Insufficiency, which is the failure of the aortic valve to close completely during diastole, causing blood to flow from the aorta back into the left ventricle. Bicuspid valve morphology is present in a fourth to a third of patients coming to surgical intervention, and constitutes a very important subset. Several conditions are associated with bicuspid disease, including ascending aortic or root aneurysms in up to a third.
Traditional management of aortic valve and root disease has been with aortic valve replacement, with or without root replacement (Bentall Procedure). However, as has been observed in patients with mitral valve repair, the option of maintaining one's reconstructed native valve versus a replacement, either bioprosthetic or mechanical, can have multiple benefits. The advantages of repair include: the avoidance of prosthetic valve related complications and structural degeneration with bioprosthetic valves over 10-15 years and elimination of the need for anticoagulation and related problems with mechanical valves in younger patients. The significantly lower rate of endocarditis after repair is a major impetus to increasing performance of BAV reconstruction. Thus, aortic valve repair currently is established as an excellent option for patients with BAV. However, with connective tissue disorders being an inherent feature of BAV, outcomes have been less stable long-term than for trileaflet repair, primarily because of late annular redilatation in BAV disease.
Therefore, this study is designed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of annular stabilization with a bicuspid annuloplasty ring in patients undergoing repair of a bicuspid aortic valve for predominant aortic insufficiency.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Surgical repair of bicuspid aortic valve using the HAART 200 Aortic Valve Annuloplasty Device .
Time frame: 6 months postprocedure
Time frame: 6 months postprocedure
Aortic insufficiency assessed by transthoracic echocardiography and graded as None/Trace (0), Mild (1+), Moderate (2+), Moderately Severe (3+), or Severe (4+)
Time frame: discharge or 14 days postprocedure, whichever comes first
Success is defined as the absence of specified adverse events evaluated through discharge following the procedure: - Aortic annular dissection, rupture, or leaflet damage - Mitral valve impingement due to implant - implant dehiscence/migration into aorta - implant dehiscence/migration into left ventricle - Hemodynamics requiring intervention - Other adverse event resulting in reoperation, explantation, or permanent disability.
Time frame: 6 months postprocedure
Freedom from specified clinical cardiovascular events 6 months postprocedure: - Device-related mortality - Complete heart block - Structural device failure - Endocarditis - Periprosthetic leak or dehiscence - Thromboembolism - Bleeding Event - Native Valve Deterioration - Valve Thrombosis - Hemolysis - Reoperation and explant at 6 months
Time frame: 2 years postprocedure
Freedom from specified clinical cardiovascular events 6 months postprocedure: - Device-related mortality - Complete heart block - Structural device failure - Endocarditis - Periprosthetic leak or dehiscence - Thromboembolism - Bleeding Event - Native Valve Deterioration - Valve Thrombosis - Hemolysis - Reoperation and explant at 6 months
Time frame: 2 years
Time frame: Baseline and 2 years
Aortic insufficiency assessed by transthoracic echocardiography and graded as None/Trace (0), Mild (1+), Moderate (2+), Moderate-to-Severe (3+), or Severe (4+)
Time frame: 6 months postprocedure
Four classes describing the effect of cardiac disease on physical activity: Class I - disease does not limit activity; Class II - slight limitation; Class III - marked limitation; Class IV - inability to carry out any physical activity without discomfort
Time frame: 2 years postprocedure
Four classes describing the effect of cardiac disease on physical activity: Class I - disease does not limit activity; Class II - slight limitation; Class III - marked limitation; Class IV - inability to carry out any physical activity without discomfort
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Transthoracic echocardiography parameter
Time frame: Baseline and 2 years
Transthoracic echocardiography parameter
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Transthoracic echocardiography parameter
Time frame: Baseline and 2 years
Transthoracic echocardiography parameter
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Left ventricular mass. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
Time frame: Baseline and 2 years
Left ventricular mass. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Left ventricular internal dimension. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
Time frame: Baseline and 2 years
Left ventricular internal dimension. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Left ventricular internal dimension. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
Time frame: Baseline and 2 years
Left ventricular internal dimension. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Left ventricular diastolic volume. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
Time frame: Baseline and 2 years
Left ventricular diastolic volume. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Left ventricular systolic volume. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
Time frame: Baseline and 2 years
Left ventricular systolic volume. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Left ventricular ejection fraction. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
Time frame: Baseline and 2 years
Left ventricular ejection fraction. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Stroke volume x heart rate. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
Time frame: Baseline and 2 years
Stroke volume x heart rate. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Hemodynamic parameter computed as cardiac output divided by body surface area
Time frame: Baseline and 2 years
Hemodynamic parameter computed as cardiac output divided by body surface area
Biostable Science & Engineering
Industry
HAART 200 Aortic Valve Annuloplasty During Bicuspid Aortic Valve Reconstruction Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05171712
Aortic Insufficiency, Aortic Stenosis
Chennai, India
View Trial DetailsNCT07116265
Aortic Diseases, Aortic Insufficiency
View Trial DetailsNCT05002088
Aortic Insufficiency, Aortic Stenosis
Adelaide, Australia
View Trial DetailsNCT04489095
Aortic Insufficiency, Aortic Stenosis
Detroit, Michigan, United States
View Trial Details