Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02071849

HAART 200 Aortic Valve Annuloplasty Trial

The HAART 200 "Aortic Annuloplasty during Bicuspid Aortic Valve Reconstruction" Trial is a prospective, non-randomized, multi-center trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the HAART 200 bicuspid annuloplasty ring when used to surgically stabilize the aortic valve annulus in patients undergoing repair of bicuspid aortic valves (BAV) for predominant aortic insufficiency (AI).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

München Heart Center, München, Bavaria, Germany

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Aortic valve disease is the most common valvular heart disease with approximately 200,000 patients per year undergoing conventional aortic valve replacement in North America and Europe. Around 60% of valves have Aortic Stenosis (AS) and 40% of have Aortic Insufficiency, which is the failure of the aortic valve to close completely during diastole, causing blood to flow from the aorta back into the left ventricle. Bicuspid valve morphology is present in a fourth to a third of patients coming to surgical intervention, and constitutes a very important subset. Several conditions are associated with bicuspid disease, including ascending aortic or root aneurysms in up to a third.

Traditional management of aortic valve and root disease has been with aortic valve replacement, with or without root replacement (Bentall Procedure). However, as has been observed in patients with mitral valve repair, the option of maintaining one's reconstructed native valve versus a replacement, either bioprosthetic or mechanical, can have multiple benefits. The advantages of repair include: the avoidance of prosthetic valve related complications and structural degeneration with bioprosthetic valves over 10-15 years and elimination of the need for anticoagulation and related problems with mechanical valves in younger patients. The significantly lower rate of endocarditis after repair is a major impetus to increasing performance of BAV reconstruction. Thus, aortic valve repair currently is established as an excellent option for patients with BAV. However, with connective tissue disorders being an inherent feature of BAV, outcomes have been less stable long-term than for trileaflet repair, primarily because of late annular redilatation in BAV disease.

Therefore, this study is designed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of annular stabilization with a bicuspid annuloplasty ring in patients undergoing repair of a bicuspid aortic valve for predominant aortic insufficiency.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • The subject is 18 years of age or older
  • The subject has bi-leaflet aortic valve morphology
  • The subject has documented aortic valve disease which may or may not include:
  • Aortic valve insufficiency
  • Ascending aortic or aortic root pathology
  • Other pathology of the ascending aorta that requires elective aortic replacement
  • Associated stable one or two vessel coronary disease requiring concomitant coronary bypass
  • Patients with recurrent severe AI (Grade 3 or 4) after prior bicuspid repair who are undergoing re-repair because of annular re-dilatation
  • All bicuspid annular and leaflet configurations will be included
  • The subject needs:
  • correction of BAV annular dilatation in patients with chronic AI and dilated annulus
  • restoration of a circular annular shape in patients with bicuspid valve and expansion of sinus to sinus dimensions
  • stabilization of annular geometry long-term in rare bicuspid valve patients with severe AI and minimal annular dilatation
  • The is willing to comply with specified follow-up evaluations, including transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) if there are inadequate images by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) to assess the aortic valve
  • The subject has reviewed and signed the written informed consent form
  • The subject agrees to return for all follow-up evaluations for the duration of the study (i.e. geographically stable)

Exclusion criteria

  • All patients will be excluded who require emergency surgery for any reason.
  • All the patients who have had a prior heart valve replacement
  • The subject's aortic valve morphology is not bicuspid.
  • The subject has active endocarditis
  • The subject has mixed stenosis and regurgitation of the aortic valve with predominant stenosis
  • Heavily calcified BAV valves, calcified aortic roots, or "porcelain aortas"
  • Leukopenia with a White Blood Cell (WBC) of less than 3000
  • Acute anemia with a Hgb less than 9mg%
  • Platelet count less than 100,000 cells/mm3
  • History of a defined bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy or the subject refuses blood transfusions
  • Active infection requiring antibiotic therapy (if temporary illness, subjects may enroll 2-4 weeks after discontinuation of antibiotics)
  • Subjects in whom transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is contraindicated
  • Low Ejection Fraction (EF) < 35%
  • Life expectancy < 1 year, or severe comorbidities, such as dialysis or severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
  • The subject is or will be participating in a concomitant research study of an investigational product or has participated in such a study within the 30 days prior to screening
  • The subject is a minor, an illicit drug user, alcohol abuser, prisoner, institutionalized, or is unable to give informed consent
  • The subject is pregnant or lactating
  • Recent (within 6 months) cerebrovascular accident (CVA) or a transient ischemic attack (TIA)
  • Myocardial Infarction (MI) within one month of trial inclusion
  • The subject has a known intolerance to titanium or polyester
  • The subject has documented unstable or > 2 vessel coronary disease
  • The subject requires additional valve replacement or valve repair

Treatment and study plan

HAART 200 Aortic Valve Annuloplasty Device

Device

Surgical repair of bicuspid aortic valve using the HAART 200 Aortic Valve Annuloplasty Device .

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary Safety Outcome Measure: Survival Defined as Survival Free From All Cause Death at 6 Months Postprocedure.

    Time frame: 6 months postprocedure

  2. Primary Efficacy Outcome Measure: Aortic Insufficiency (AI) at 6 Months

    Time frame: 6 months postprocedure

    Aortic insufficiency assessed by transthoracic echocardiography and graded as None/Trace (0), Mild (1+), Moderate (2+), Moderately Severe (3+), or Severe (4+)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Implant Procedure Success

    Time frame: discharge or 14 days postprocedure, whichever comes first

    Success is defined as the absence of specified adverse events evaluated through discharge following the procedure: - Aortic annular dissection, rupture, or leaflet damage - Mitral valve impingement due to implant - implant dehiscence/migration into aorta - implant dehiscence/migration into left ventricle - Hemodynamics requiring intervention - Other adverse event resulting in reoperation, explantation, or permanent disability.

  2. Actuarial Freedom From Clinical Cardiovascular Events

    Time frame: 6 months postprocedure

    Freedom from specified clinical cardiovascular events 6 months postprocedure: - Device-related mortality - Complete heart block - Structural device failure - Endocarditis - Periprosthetic leak or dehiscence - Thromboembolism - Bleeding Event - Native Valve Deterioration - Valve Thrombosis - Hemolysis - Reoperation and explant at 6 months

  3. Actuarial Freedom From Clinical Cardiovascular Events

    Time frame: 2 years postprocedure

    Freedom from specified clinical cardiovascular events 6 months postprocedure: - Device-related mortality - Complete heart block - Structural device failure - Endocarditis - Periprosthetic leak or dehiscence - Thromboembolism - Bleeding Event - Native Valve Deterioration - Valve Thrombosis - Hemolysis - Reoperation and explant at 6 months

  4. Survival Defined as Survival Free From All Cause Death at 2 Years Postprocedure.

    Time frame: 2 years

  5. Aortic Insufficiency (AI) at 2 Years

    Time frame: Baseline and 2 years

    Aortic insufficiency assessed by transthoracic echocardiography and graded as None/Trace (0), Mild (1+), Moderate (2+), Moderate-to-Severe (3+), or Severe (4+)

  6. New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Capacity Classification

    Time frame: 6 months postprocedure

    Four classes describing the effect of cardiac disease on physical activity: Class I - disease does not limit activity; Class II - slight limitation; Class III - marked limitation; Class IV - inability to carry out any physical activity without discomfort

  7. NYHA Functional Capacity Classification

    Time frame: 2 years postprocedure

    Four classes describing the effect of cardiac disease on physical activity: Class I - disease does not limit activity; Class II - slight limitation; Class III - marked limitation; Class IV - inability to carry out any physical activity without discomfort

  8. Peak Gradient - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

    Transthoracic echocardiography parameter

  9. Peak Gradient - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline and 2 years

    Transthoracic echocardiography parameter

  10. Mean Gradient - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

    Transthoracic echocardiography parameter

  11. Mean Gradient - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline and 2 years

    Transthoracic echocardiography parameter

  12. Left Ventricular (LV) Mass - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

    Left ventricular mass. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

  13. LV Mass - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline and 2 years

    Left ventricular mass. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

  14. Left Ventricular Internal Dimension (LVID) Diastole - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

    Left ventricular internal dimension. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

  15. LVID Diastole - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline and 2 years

    Left ventricular internal dimension. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

  16. LVID Systole - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

    Left ventricular internal dimension. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

  17. LVID Systole - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline and 2 years

    Left ventricular internal dimension. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

  18. LV Diastolic Volume - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

    Left ventricular diastolic volume. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

  19. LV Diastolic Volume - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline and 2 years

    Left ventricular diastolic volume. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

  20. LV Systolic Volume - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

    Left ventricular systolic volume. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

  21. LV Systolic Volume - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline and 2 years

    Left ventricular systolic volume. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

  22. Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

    Left ventricular ejection fraction. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

  23. Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline and 2 years

    Left ventricular ejection fraction. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

  24. Cardiac Output - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

    Stroke volume x heart rate. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

  25. Cardiac Output - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline and 2 years

    Stroke volume x heart rate. Transthoracic echocardiography parameter.

  26. Cardiac Index - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

    Hemodynamic parameter computed as cardiac output divided by body surface area

  27. Cardiac Index - Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline and 2 years

    Hemodynamic parameter computed as cardiac output divided by body surface area

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Biostable Science & Engineering

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

HAART 200 Aortic Valve Annuloplasty During Bicuspid Aortic Valve Reconstruction Trial

Important dates

Study start
2013
Primary completion
2015
Study completion
2016
First posted
Feb 26, 2014
Registry last updated
Apr 17, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.