Jordan royal medical service
Amman, Jordan
NCT Number: NCT04451655
Objectives: Intraoperative glycemic stability and control among patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery remains a significant concern. In this study, the intraoperative glycemic stability among diabetic patients undergoing CABG surgery was compared between patients who received an intravenous continuous insulin infusion (CII) for tight glycemic control with those who received an CII for conventional glycemic control, during the intraoperative period.
Research Design and Methods: This study implemented a quasi-experimental design with a convenience sample of 144 patients with DM undergoing CABG surgery at a major hospital in Amman, Jordan.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me43 year–74 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Amman, Jordan
Objectives: Intraoperative glycemic stability and control among patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery remains a significant concern. In this study, the intraoperative glycemic stability among diabetic patients undergoing CABG surgery was compared between patients who received an intravenous continuous insulin infusion (CII) for tight glycemic control with those who received an CII for conventional glycemic control, during the intraoperative period.
Research Design and Methods: This study implemented a quasi-experimental design with a convenience sample of 144 patients with DM undergoing CABG surgery at a major hospital in Amman, Jordan. Participants were randomly assigned to either a tight glycemic control group (n=72) or a conventional glycemic control group (n=72). Patients who received the tight glycemic control protocol had significantly more consistent and lower mean intraoperative BG levels than those who received the conventional glycemic control protocol. The tight glycemic control protocol resulted in significantly lower BG levels and fewer variations across each time-point and more consistent and stable BG levels than the conventional glycemic control protocol.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
This study aims to explore the hypothesis that diabetic patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery receiving intravenous continuous insulin infusion (CII) for tight glycemic control (110-149 mg/dl) protocol during the intraoperative period would have improved intraoperative glycemic stability, efficacy and consistency compared to patients receiving conventional glycemic control (150-180 mg/dl) protocol during the intraoperative period
Time frame: every half hour for eight hours
Intraoperative glycemic instability is defined as three consecutive readings of intraoperative blood glucose (BG) levels outside the pre-set targeted ranges of the protocols, whether higher or lower than the limits
Audai A. Hayajneh
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07043478
Blood Glucose, Healthy
London, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT07187648
Blood Glucose, Blood-Borne Infections
Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia
View Trial DetailsNCT06497972
Blood Glucose
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT06458946
Blood Glucose, Blood Insulin
Addison, Illinois, United States
View Trial Details