Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04966208

Gingival Recession Treatment Using Two Different Surgical Techniques

Coronally the advanced flap is considered a predictable treatment of gingival recession but in certain situations, it needs a filler like subperiosteal connective tissue graft (CTG) which is considered as the gold standard treatment approach.

This randomized controlled trial compares the clinical benefits and effectiveness of a xenogenic collagen matrix (mucoderm, botiss, dental, Berlin, Germany) as a filler to the subperiosteal connective tissue graft (CTG).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Gingival Recession Gingival Diseases Mouth Diseases Periodontal Atrophy Periodontal Diseases Root Planing Stomatognathic Diseases

Age range

18 year–60 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Assiut University

Asyut, 71111111, Egypt

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • -The selected patients for this study are non-smokers, aged 18-60 years with multiple gingival recession (Miller class 1, or 2.) for more than two adjacent affected teeth with plaque score less than 25%

Exclusion criteria

  • -Patients with systemic complications, psychological problems, parafunctional habits, or patients presented with Mal-posed teeth, hypermobile teeth, teeth with Miller class 3 gingival recession were excluded from this study.

Treatment and study plan

Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix

Procedure

xenogeneic collagen matrix called mucoderm used for root coverage for treatment of gingival recession instead of harvesting from the patients connective tissue

Primary outcomes

  1. The zone of keratinized gingiva

    Time frame: 6 months after the surgery

    The distance from the tip of the papilla to the mucogingival junction minus the probing depth measured in mm using graduated periodontal probe.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Periodontal probing depth

    Time frame: 6 months after the surgery

    measured from the gingival margin to the depth of the gingival sulcus in six sites per tooth and measured in mm.

  2. Clinical attachment loss

    Time frame: 6 months after the surgery

    measured from the cementoenamel junction to the depth of the sulcus in six sites per tooth and measured in mm.

  3. Gingival recession

    Time frame: 6 months after the surgery

    The depth measured from the gingival margin to the cementoenamel junction in mm.

  4. Patient satisfaction of the esthetics

    Time frame: 6 months

    measured using the visual analog scale.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Assiut University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Root Coverage Using Tunneling Technique of Xenogenic Collagen Matrix vs. Autologous Connective Tissue as a Treatment of Miller Class Two Gingival Recession (RCT Study)

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Jul 19, 2021
Registry last updated
Jul 19, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.