Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
Bethesda, Maryland, 20814, United States
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT07096271
This study is testing a program called Get Better Together, a relationship education program designed to help military couples effectively navigate life stressors as a team. The goal is to find out if attending Get Better Together improves mental health and relationship skills, and reduces problems like alcohol misuse, aggression, and suicide risk. Couples who join the study will be randomly placed into one of two groups. One group will attend Get Better Together at a weekend retreat. The other group will continue their usual activities and later receive access to an online relationship education program. All participants will complete surveys before the retreat and again 2, 4, and 6 months later.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Bethesda, Maryland, 20814, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Get Better Together is a couple-based, primary prevention program designed to reduce risk for suicidal thoughts and behaviors, problematic alcohol use, and intimate partner violence by addressing two transdiagnostic drivers: emotion dysregulation and relationship conflict. The intervention is an adaptation of the empirically supported Prevention and Relationship Enhancement Program (PREP), modified in collaboration with military stakeholders to meet the unique cultural and contextual needs of military couples.
The GBT curriculum includes approximately 10 hours of structured content presented using didactic instruction, video demonstrations, group discussions, and guided couple exercises. Skills focus on interpersonal emotion regulation (e.g., emotion identification, acceptance, reappraisal, and problem solving) and evidence-based communication strategies (e.g., structured communication strategies, conflict de-escalation).
Time frame: Baseline, 2-month, 4-month, and 6-month follow-up
Assessed using the Suicide Cognition Scale-Revised (SCS-R), a 16-item validated self-report measure capturing cognitive risk factors for suicidal behavior. Scores range from 0 to 64, with higher scores reflect greater risk.
Time frame: Baseline, 2-month, 4-month, and 6-month follow-up
Measured using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption (AUDIT-C), a 3-item measure designed to identify hazardous drinking. Scores range from 0 to 12, with higher scores reflect greater likelihood of drinking affecting one's health and safety.
Time frame: Baseline, 2-month, 4-month, and 6-month follow-up
Measured using the Revised Conflict Tactics Scale-Short Form (CTS2S), a 20-item measure assessing multiple types of relationship abuse. Dichotomous scores will indicate the presence of any form of abuse. Dichotomous subscale scores will indicate the presence of assault, injury, psychological aggression, or sexual coercion.
Time frame: Baseline, 2-month, 4-month, and 6-month follow-up
Measured using the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale - 18 Item (DERS-18), which assesses six dimensions of emotion dysregulation: awareness, clarity, nonacceptance, impulse, goals, and strategies. Total scores range from 18 to 90, with higher scores indicating more severe difficulties regulating one's emotions.
Time frame: Baseline, 2-month, 4-month, and 6-month follow-up
Evaluated using the Ineffective Arguing Inventory (IAI), an 8-item scale measuring perceived patterns of unresolved conflict and communication breakdown in romantic relationships. Total scores range from 8 to 40, with higher scores indicating a higher degree of ineffective communication.
Time frame: Baseline, 2-month, 4-month, and 6-month follow-up
Measured using the Dyadic Coping Inventory (DCI), an 37-item self-report measure assessing how couples communicate stress and cope together (supportive, delegated, negative, and joint coping). Total scores range from 37 to 185, with higher scores indicated higher levels of dyadic coping.
Time frame: Baseline, 2-month, 4-month, and 6-month follow-up
Assessed using the Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale (RDAS), a 14-item self-report measure evaluating relationship functioning across three domains: Dyadic Consensus, Dyadic Satisfaction, and Dyadic Cohesion. Items assess agreement on relationship issues, frequency of shared activities, and satisfaction with the relationship. Total scores range from 0 to 69, with higher scores indicating greater relationship satisfaction.
Time frame: Baseline, 2-month, 4-month, and 6-month follow-up
Measured using items adapted from the 2017 Workplace and Equal Opportunity Survey of Active Duty Members (Office of People Analytics, 2018), a DoD standardized survey tool. Items assess key indicators of readiness, including self intent to remain in the military. Items use Likert-type scales appropriate to each domain (e.g., "Very poorly prepared" to "Very well prepared"). The items are designed to be used independently rather than as a single composite scale.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine
Other
Better Together: A Relationship Enrichment Program Targeting Transdiagnostic Interpersonal Emotion Regulation Among Military Couples
Acronym: GBT RCT
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07100951
Anxiety Disorders, Attachment
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT05145868
Aberrant Motor Behavior in Dementia, Aggression
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05933629
Behavior, Brain Diseases
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06458920
Behavior, Emotion Regulation
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial Details