Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
New York, 10029, United States
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT05933629
This is a hybrid type III implementation-effectiveness trial; this study design blends elements of implementation and clinical effectiveness research, with the primary aim of determining the utility of an implementation strategy and a secondary aim of assessing clinical outcomes associated with the implementation trial. Consistent with best practices for this type of design, the study team will conduct a randomized test of the effect of implementation strategy on effective delivery of the Online EmReg intervention in clinical practice. Specifically, the study team will compare Standard Training (a 3-hour on-demand training workshop) to Extended Training, (a 3-hour on-demand training workshop with 3 months of bi-weekly consultation). The research team's primary aim is to determine the optimal strategy to train clinicians in effectively delivering Online EmReg, and secondary aim is to assess patient improvement per clinician-administered DERS. Outcome measures will be assessed via self-report surveys, performance evaluations (via role-plays), and tracked clinician participation and fidelity. Study participation is expected to last up to 18 months.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
New York, 10029, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
A Web-based group intervention to improve emotion regulation in individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Online EmReg is a 3-hour on-demand training workshop
3 months of bi-weekly consultation sessions
Time frame: Up to 18 months
A 7-item Likert Scale (not at all confident (1) to fully confident (7)) adapted for use with EmReg to assess provider confidence in delivering core components of the Online EmReg intervention. Total scores range from 26 to 182. Higher values indicate a higher level of self-efficacy. Used in the literature to reliably predict implementation of evidence-based interventions.
Time frame: Post-3 hour EmReg training workshop
Assessed using a structured role play of EmReg groups in a simulated clinical setting. These role plays will be recorded and rated by a blinded evaluator. The evaluator will indicate the degrees to which the session goals were accomplished using a 15-item checklist. Each item will be rated a 0 (not introduced or covered), 1 (attempted/partially achieved), 2 (fully covered/achieved), or N/A (not applicable/relevant to session #). Participants can receive a total score of 0 to 30 on their performance-based role play. Higher values indicate higher achievement.
Time frame: Up to 18 months
Satisfaction with training will be assessed using the Training Satisfaction Rating Scale, a 12-item, 5-point Likert scale (higher scores = higher satisfaction). Total scores range from 12 to 60. Training engagement and consultation engagement (extended group only) will be tracked by study team.
Time frame: Up to 18 months
Provider's satisfaction with the intervention will be assessed using the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), a 4-item, 5-point Likert scale. Total scores can range from 4 to 20 with higher scores indicating greater acceptability.
Time frame: Up to 18 months
Feasibility of the intervention will be assessed using the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM), a 4-item, 5-point Likert scale. Total scores can range from 4 to 20 with higher scores indicating greater feasibility.
Time frame: Up to 18 months
Appropriateness of the intervention will be assessed using the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM), a 4-item, 5-point Likert scale. Total scores can range from 4 to 20 with higher scores indicating greater intervention appropriateness.
Time frame: Up to 18 months
The number of EmReg groups scheduled and completed by the clinician participants
Time frame: Up to 18 months
The time between completion of training and initial uptake will be tracked.
Time frame: Up to 18 months
Clinician participants will be given a 25-item multiple-choice test of knowledge of Online EmReg training content. Correct answers are coded as 1 and incorrect answers are coded as 0. Scores range from 0-25 with higher scores indicating greater knowledge of the intervention.
Time frame: Up to 18 months
Clinician participants will be asked to track the number of patients who receive treatment out of those who appear eligible.
Time frame: Up to 18 months
A 36-item questionnaire assessing capacity for emotion regulation. Each item is scored on a 5-point scale. Total scores range from 80 to 136. Out of the 36 items, 11 are reverse scored. Higher scores suggest greater problems with emotion regulation.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Annell Ovalles, MPH
CONTACT
Emily Blunt, BA
CONTACT
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Other
Community-based Implementation of an Emotion Regulation Intervention for Individuals With Traumatic Brain Injury
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03479606
Behavior, Brain Diseases
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01730261
Behavior, Brain Diseases
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07732374
Behavior, Brain Concussion
Boise, Idaho, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07455136
Brain Diseases, Brain Injuries
Sacramento, California, United States
View Trial Details