GeneXpert I
DeviceOnsite molecular testing with GeneXpert I as a replacement for microscopy
Other names: GeneXpert
NCT Number: NCT03044158
The investigators' overall objective is to assess the effectiveness, implementation and costs of a streamlined TB diagnostic evaluation strategy based around rapid, onsite molecular testing. The intervention strategy was developed based on theory-informed assessment of barriers to TB diagnostic evaluation at community health centers in Uganda and a process of engagement with local stakeholders. It includes: 1) Point-of-care molecular testing using GeneXpert as a replacement for sputum smear microscopy; 2) Re-structuring of clinic-level procedures to facilitate same-day TB diagnosis and treatment; and 3) Quarterly feedback of TB evaluation metrics to health center staff. The investigators' central hypothesis is that the intervention strategy will have high uptake and increase the number of patients diagnosed with and treated for active pulmonary TB. To test this hypothesis, the investigators will conduct a pragmatic cluster-randomized trial at community health centers that provide TB microscopy services in Uganda in partnership with the National TB Program (NTP). The investigators utilize an effectiveness-implementation hybrid design in which, concurrent with the clinical trial, the investigators will conduct nested mixed methods, health economic and modeling studies to assess 1) whether the intervention strategy modifies targeted barriers to TB diagnostic evaluation; 2) fidelity of implementation of the intervention components (i.e, the degree to which intervention components were implemented as intended vs. adapted across sites); and 3) cost-effectiveness and public health impact.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–100 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
St Francis Njeru Health Center III, Buikwe, Uganda
Aim 1: To compare patient outcomes at health centers randomized to intervention vs. standard-of-care TB diagnostic evaluation strategies. The investigators will randomize 20 community health centers to continue standard TB evaluation (routine microscopy plus referral of patients for Xpert testing per existing processes of care) or to implement the intervention strategy (1. Onsite molecular testing; 2. Re-structuring clinic-level procedures to facilitate same-day TB diagnosis and treatment; and 3. Performance feedback). The investigators will compare reach and effectiveness based on the numbers and proportions of patients (N=5500) who complete TB testing, are found to have TB, and have treatment initiated within one week of specimen provision.
Aim 2: To identify processes and contextual factors that influence the effectiveness and fidelity of the intervention TB diagnostic evaluation strategy. The investigators will use quantitative process metrics to assess the adoption and maintenance over time of the core components of the intervention strategy. The investigators will also collect quantitative and qualitative data to describe the fidelity of implementation of each component and faithfulness to the conceptual model.
Aim 3: To compare the costs and epidemiological impact of intervention vs. standard-of-care TB diagnostic evaluation strategies. The investigators will model the incremental costs and cost-effectiveness of intervention relative to standard-of-care TB diagnostic evaluation from the health system and patient perspective. The investigators will then construct an epidemic model of the population-level impact of the intervention strategy on TB incidence and mortality.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Onsite molecular testing with GeneXpert I as a replacement for microscopy
Other names: GeneXpert
Research and Uganda NTLP staff will engage health center staff in a discussion of how to re-organize clinical, laboratory and pharmacy services to enable same-day TB diagnosis and treatment.
Feedback of TB diagnostic evaluation quality indicators to health center staff
Time frame: Within 14 days after presentation to the health center for tuberculosis evaluation
Effectiveness outcome.
Time frame: Within 14 days after presentation to the health center for tuberculosis evaluation
Effectiveness outcome.
Time frame: Within 6 months of presentation to the health center for tuberculosis evaluation
Effectiveness outcome. Time-to-diagnosis if microbiologically-confirmed TB.
Time frame: Within 14 days of presentation to the health center for tuberculosis evaluation
Effectiveness outcome.
Time frame: Days from initial health center visit to initiation of treatment if diagnosed, up to 6 months.
Effectiveness outcome. Time-to-treatment if microbiologically-confirmed TB and treated.
Time frame: Within 6 months of presentation to the health center for tuberculosis evaluation
Effectiveness outcome.
Time frame: Presentation to the health center for tuberculosis evaluation during the 16-month study time frame
Effectiveness outcome.
Time frame: Within 6 months of presentation to the health center for tuberculosis evaluation
Effectiveness outcome.
Time frame: Within 6 months of presentation to the health center for tuberculosis evaluation
Effectiveness outcome.
Time frame: On the same-day of presentation to the health center for tuberculosis evaluation
Effectiveness outcome.
Time frame: On the same-day of presentation to the health center for tuberculosis evaluation
Effectiveness outcome.
University of California, San Francisco
Other
GeneXpert Performance Evaluation for Linkage to Tuberculosis Care: The XPEL-TB Trial
Acronym: XPEL-TB
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04968886
Actinomycetales Infections, Bacterial Infections
Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
View Trial DetailsNCT05007821
Actinomycetales Infections, Bacterial Infections
Gaborone, South-East District, Botswana
View Trial DetailsNCT04752592
Actinomycetales Infections, Bacterial Infections
Awasa, Ethiopia
View Trial DetailsNCT03512249
Actinomycetales Infections, Bacterial Infections
Bellville, Cape Town, South Africa
View Trial Details