Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03044158

GeneXpert Performance Evaluation for Linkage to Tuberculosis Care

The investigators' overall objective is to assess the effectiveness, implementation and costs of a streamlined TB diagnostic evaluation strategy based around rapid, onsite molecular testing. The intervention strategy was developed based on theory-informed assessment of barriers to TB diagnostic evaluation at community health centers in Uganda and a process of engagement with local stakeholders. It includes: 1) Point-of-care molecular testing using GeneXpert as a replacement for sputum smear microscopy; 2) Re-structuring of clinic-level procedures to facilitate same-day TB diagnosis and treatment; and 3) Quarterly feedback of TB evaluation metrics to health center staff. The investigators' central hypothesis is that the intervention strategy will have high uptake and increase the number of patients diagnosed with and treated for active pulmonary TB. To test this hypothesis, the investigators will conduct a pragmatic cluster-randomized trial at community health centers that provide TB microscopy services in Uganda in partnership with the National TB Program (NTP). The investigators utilize an effectiveness-implementation hybrid design in which, concurrent with the clinical trial, the investigators will conduct nested mixed methods, health economic and modeling studies to assess 1) whether the intervention strategy modifies targeted barriers to TB diagnostic evaluation; 2) fidelity of implementation of the intervention components (i.e, the degree to which intervention components were implemented as intended vs. adapted across sites); and 3) cost-effectiveness and public health impact.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–100 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

St Francis Njeru Health Center III, Buikwe, Uganda

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Aim 1: To compare patient outcomes at health centers randomized to intervention vs. standard-of-care TB diagnostic evaluation strategies. The investigators will randomize 20 community health centers to continue standard TB evaluation (routine microscopy plus referral of patients for Xpert testing per existing processes of care) or to implement the intervention strategy (1. Onsite molecular testing; 2. Re-structuring clinic-level procedures to facilitate same-day TB diagnosis and treatment; and 3. Performance feedback). The investigators will compare reach and effectiveness based on the numbers and proportions of patients (N=5500) who complete TB testing, are found to have TB, and have treatment initiated within one week of specimen provision.

Aim 2: To identify processes and contextual factors that influence the effectiveness and fidelity of the intervention TB diagnostic evaluation strategy. The investigators will use quantitative process metrics to assess the adoption and maintenance over time of the core components of the intervention strategy. The investigators will also collect quantitative and qualitative data to describe the fidelity of implementation of each component and faithfulness to the conceptual model.

Aim 3: To compare the costs and epidemiological impact of intervention vs. standard-of-care TB diagnostic evaluation strategies. The investigators will model the incremental costs and cost-effectiveness of intervention relative to standard-of-care TB diagnostic evaluation from the health system and patient perspective. The investigators will then construct an epidemic model of the population-level impact of the intervention strategy on TB incidence and mortality.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Site-level: Use standard (multi-day) sputum smear microscopy as the primary method of TB diagnosis
  • Site-level: Participate in NTP-sponsored external quality assurance (EQA) for sputum smear microscopy
  • Site-level: Send samples to a district or regional hospital/health center for Xpert testing
  • Patient-level: Initiate evaluation for active TB at a study health center

Exclusion criteria

  • Site-level: Do not agree to be randomized to standard-of-care vs. intervention arms
  • Site-level: Perform sputum smear examination on <150 patients per year (based on 2015 data)
  • Site-level: Diagnose <15 smear-positive TB cases per year (based on 2015 data)
  • Patient-level: Have sputum collected for monitoring of response to anti-TB therapy
  • Patient-level: Have sputum collected as part of active, community-based case finding (e.g., contact tracing, community outreach campaign)
  • Patient-level: Referred to a study health center for TB treatment after a diagnosis is established elsewhere
  • Patient-level: Started on TB treatment for extra-pulmonary TB only

Treatment and study plan

GeneXpert I

Device

Onsite molecular testing with GeneXpert I as a replacement for microscopy

Other names: GeneXpert

Process re-design

Behavioral

Research and Uganda NTLP staff will engage health center staff in a discussion of how to re-organize clinical, laboratory and pharmacy services to enable same-day TB diagnosis and treatment.

Performance Feedback

Other

Feedback of TB diagnostic evaluation quality indicators to health center staff

Primary outcomes

  1. Number Treated for Microbiologically-confirmed TB Within 14 Days After Presentation to the Health Center for TB Evaluation

    Time frame: Within 14 days after presentation to the health center for tuberculosis evaluation

    Effectiveness outcome.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number Diagnosed With Microbiologically-confirmed TB

    Time frame: Within 14 days after presentation to the health center for tuberculosis evaluation

    Effectiveness outcome.

  2. Time to Microbiologically-confirmed TB

    Time frame: Within 6 months of presentation to the health center for tuberculosis evaluation

    Effectiveness outcome. Time-to-diagnosis if microbiologically-confirmed TB.

  3. Number Treated for TB

    Time frame: Within 14 days of presentation to the health center for tuberculosis evaluation

    Effectiveness outcome.

  4. Time-to-treatment of Microbiologically-confirmed TB

    Time frame: Days from initial health center visit to initiation of treatment if diagnosed, up to 6 months.

    Effectiveness outcome. Time-to-treatment if microbiologically-confirmed TB and treated.

  5. Number Who Died Within 6 Months

    Time frame: Within 6 months of presentation to the health center for tuberculosis evaluation

    Effectiveness outcome.

  6. Number of Patients Enrolled

    Time frame: Presentation to the health center for tuberculosis evaluation during the 16-month study time frame

    Effectiveness outcome.

  7. Number Tested for TB According to National Guidelines

    Time frame: Within 6 months of presentation to the health center for tuberculosis evaluation

    Effectiveness outcome.

  8. Number Suspected/Diagnosed With Rifampin-resistant TB

    Time frame: Within 6 months of presentation to the health center for tuberculosis evaluation

    Effectiveness outcome.

  9. Number Diagnosed and Treated for Microbiologically-confirmed TB

    Time frame: On the same-day of presentation to the health center for tuberculosis evaluation

    Effectiveness outcome.

  10. Number Diagnosed AND Treated for TB

    Time frame: On the same-day of presentation to the health center for tuberculosis evaluation

    Effectiveness outcome.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of California, San Francisco

Other

Collaborators

  • Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
  • London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
  • Makerere University
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
  • Yale University

Registry information

Official study title

GeneXpert Performance Evaluation for Linkage to Tuberculosis Care: The XPEL-TB Trial

Acronym: XPEL-TB

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2022
First posted
Feb 6, 2017
Registry last updated
Feb 18, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.