Linezolid 600 mg
DrugOne 600mg tablet taken orally once daily (QD) in the morning during weeks 1-26
Other names: LZD
NCT Number: NCT05007821
The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy (how well the medicines work) and tolerability (whether participants stop treatment because of side effects from a drug) of an anti-TB treatment regimen that compared two doses of linezolid (LZD), combined with bedaquiline (BDQ), delamanid (DLM), and clofazimine (CFZ). This study also measured the level of LZD and BDQ in the participants' blood.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Gaborone CRS (Site ID: 12701), Gaborone, South-East District, Botswana
When the study was designed, there was currently no "standard of care" or single standardized treatment regimen recommended for everyone with drug resistant-tuberculosis (DR-TB). Current DR-TB treatments were not well tolerated and often had side effects. There was a need to identify drugs with enough anti-TB activity (treatment against TB) and good safety profiles that could improve outcomes in the treatment of DR-TB.
The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a new shorter course anti-TB treatment regimen that compared two dosing strategies of linezolid (LZD), combined with bedaquiline (BDQ), delamanid (DLM), and clofazimine (CFZ). As a secondary aim, the study assessed the safety (the level and type of side effects from a drug or treatment) of the combination of these drugs.
Everyone in the study took BDQ, DLM, and CFZ once a day for the entire treatment period. The difference between the two treatment groups in the study was in how participants took the fourth drug: LZD. Participants in group A took one dose of LZD once a day for the entire treatment period. Participants in group B took a higher dose of LZD once a day for 4 weeks and then took that higher dose of LZD just three times a week for the rest of the treatment period.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
One 600mg tablet taken orally once daily (QD) in the morning during weeks 1-26
Other names: LZD
Two 600mg tablets taken orally once daily (QD) in the morning during weeks 1-4
Other names: LZD
Two 600mg tablets taken orally three times per week (TIW; Mon-Wed-Fri) in the morning during weeks 5-26
Other names: LZD
Two 100mg tablets taken orally once daily in the morning during weeks 1-8
Other names: BDQ
One 100mg tablet taken orally once daily in the morning during weeks 9-26
Other names: BDQ
Six 50mg tablets taken orally once daily in the morning during weeks 1-26
Other names: DLM
Three 100mg capsules taken orally once daily in the morning during weeks 1-2
Other names: CFZ
One 100mg capsule taken orally once daily in the morning during weeks 3-26
Other names: CFZ
Time frame: Up to 26 weeks
Time of stable liquid culture conversion was the visit corresponding to the 1st of 2 consecutive MTB-neg cultures obtained at least 7 days apart without an intervening MTB-pos culture. Inability to produce sputum with or without induction was considered an MTB-neg culture. A participant was MTB-pos at a visit if at least 1 of the liquid cultures was MTB-pos. A participant was MTB-neg at a visit if both liquid cultures were MTB-neg or if 1 liquid culture was MTB-neg and the other was missing or indeterminate. If the 1st MTB-neg liquid culture was at week 26, then conversion was met. If a participant did not convert by week 26, they were censored at their last culture result. If a participant died (any cause except trauma), they were censored at week 26 (worst possible outcome). Within-arm Kaplan-Meier estimates of proportions at week 26 and the Cox proportional hazards regression model hazard ratio were calculated; between-arm differences were tested with the log rank test.
Time frame: Up to 26 weeks
Time of permanent discontinuation of at least one anti-TB drug due to side effects that did not lead to a protocol-required discontinuation, due to participant non-compliance with at least one anti-TB drug or study visits, or due to participant request was the corresponding date of discontinuation. If a participant did not permanently discontinue at least one anti-TB drug due to side effects that did not lead to a protocol-required discontinuation, due to participant non-compliance with at least one anti-TB drug or study visits, or due to participant request by week 26, they were censored at the date of permanent treatment discontinuation of all study drugs or, if still on study treatment, at week 26. Within-arm Kaplan-Meier estimates of proportions of participants with permanent discontinuation were calculated with 2-sided 95% confidence intervals using standard errors based on Greenwood's formula.
Time frame: At week 8
Time of stable liquid culture conversion was the visit corresponding to the 1st of 2 consecutive MTB-neg cultures obtained at least 7 days apart without an intervening MTB-pos culture. Inability to produce sputum with or without induction was considered an MTB-neg culture. A participant was MTB-pos at a visit if at least 1 of the liquid cultures was MTB-pos. A participant was MTB-neg at a visit if both liquid cultures were MTB-neg or if 1 liquid culture was MTB-neg and the other was missing or indeterminate. If a participant did not convert by week 8, they were censored at their last culture result. If a participant died (any cause except trauma), they were censored at week 26 (worst possible outcome). Within-arm Kaplan-Meier estimates of proportions of participants with stable liquid culture conversion were calculated with 2-sided 95% confidence intervals using standard errors based on Greenwood's formula.
Time frame: At week 16
Time of stable liquid culture conversion was the visit corresponding to the 1st of 2 consecutive MTB-neg cultures obtained at least 7 days apart without an intervening MTB-pos culture. Inability to produce sputum with or without induction was considered an MTB-neg culture. A participant was MTB-pos at a visit if at least 1 of the liquid cultures was MTB-pos. A participant was MTB-neg at a visit if both liquid cultures were MTB-neg or if 1 liquid culture was MTB-neg and the other was missing or indeterminate. If a participant did not convert by week 16, they were censored at their last culture result. If a participant died (any cause except trauma), they were censored at week 26 (worst possible outcome). Within-arm Kaplan-Meier estimates of proportions of participants with stable liquid culture conversion were calculated with 2-sided 95% confidence intervals using standard errors based on Greenwood's formula.
Time frame: At week 26
Time of stable liquid culture conversion was the visit corresponding to the 1st of 2 consecutive MTB-neg cultures obtained at least 7 days apart without an intervening MTB-pos culture. Inability to produce sputum with or without induction was considered an MTB-neg culture. A participant was MTB-pos at a visit if at least 1 of the liquid cultures was MTB-pos. A participant was MTB-neg at a visit if both liquid cultures were MTB-neg or if 1 liquid culture was MTB-neg and the other was missing or indeterminate. If a participant did not convert by week 26, they were censored at their last culture result. If a participant died (any cause except trauma), they were censored at week 26 (worst possible outcome). Within-arm Kaplan-Meier estimates of proportions of participants with stable liquid culture conversion were calculated with 2-sided 95% confidence intervals using standard errors based on Greenwood's formula.
Time frame: At week 38
The study's primary completion date corresponded to the week 26 visit. Thus, data only through week 26 were analyzed. Data from the week 38 visit will be analyzed after the study completion date.
Time frame: Up to 26 weeks
Time of permanent discontinuation of LZD due to side effects that did not lead to a protocol-required discontinuation, due to participant non-compliance with LZD or study visits, or due to participant request was the corresponding date of discontinuation. If a participant did not permanently discontinue LZD due to side effects that did not lead to a protocol-required discontinuation, due to participant non-compliance with LZD or study visits, or due to participant request by week 26, they were censored at the date of permanent discontinuation of LZD or, if still on study treatment, at week 26. Within-arm Kaplan-Meier estimates of proportions of participants with permanent discontinuation were calculated with 2-sided 95% confidence intervals using standard errors based on Greenwood's formula.
Time frame: Up to 26 weeks
Time of temporary discontinuation of LZD for any reason was the corresponding date of first temporary discontinuation. If a participant did not temporarily discontinue LZD by week 26, they were censored at the date of permanent discontinuation of LZD or, if still on study treatment, at week 26. Within-arm Kaplan-Meier estimates of proportions of participants with temporary discontinuation of LZD were calculated with 2-sided 95% confidence intervals using standard errors based on Greenwood's formula.
Time frame: Up to 26 weeks
Time of LZD dose reduction was the corresponding date of the first LZD dose reduction. If a participant did not undergo a LZD dose reduction by week 26, they were censored at the date of permanent discontinuation of LZD or, if still on study treatment, at week 26. Within-arm Kaplan-Meier estimates of proportions of participants with LZD dose reduction were calculated with 2-sided 95% confidence intervals using standard errors based on Greenwood's formula.
Time frame: Up to 26 weeks
Time of treatment-related adverse event was the corresponding date of the averse event. If a participant did not experience a treatment-related adverse event, they were censored at the date of permanent treatment discontinuation of all study drugs or, if still on study treatment, at week 26. Within-arm Kaplan-Meier estimates of proportions of participants with treatment-related adverse event were calculated with 2-sided 95% confidence intervals using standard errors based on Greenwood's formula.
Time frame: At week 26
Unfavorable TB treatment outcome is defined as meeting one or more of the following: 1. Participants with confirmed microbiologic TB treatment failure; 2. Participants who fail to complete study treatment or require extension of study treatment beyond the study-prescribed treatment duration due to clinically inadequate response; 3. Participants who had a positive sputum MTB culture at their last study visit; 4. Participants who die from any cause during study treatment, except from violent or accidental cause; or 5. Participants failing to complete study treatment and not assessable at the end of the follow-up period. If a participant did not experience an unfavorable TB treatment outcome by week 26, they were censored at their last TB treatment outcome determination. Within-arm Kaplan-Meier estimates of proportions of participants with unfavorable TB treatment outcome were calculated with 2-sided 95% confidence intervals using standard errors based on Greenwood's formula.
Time frame: At week 38
The study's primary completion date corresponded to the week 26 visit. Thus, data only through week 26 were analyzed. Data from the week 38 visit will be analyzed after the study completion date.
Time frame: At week 72
The study's primary completion date corresponded to the week 26 visit. Thus, data only through week 26 were analyzed. Data from the week 72 visit will be analyzed after the study completion date.
Time frame: At week 4
Estimated based on concentrations from intensive PK sampling times at pre-dose, 1 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours, 8 hours, and 24 hours.
Time frame: At week 4
Estimated based on concentrations from intensive PK sampling times at pre-dose, 1 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours, 8 hours, and 24 hours.
Time frame: At week 4
Estimated based on concentrations from intensive PK sampling times at pre-dose, 1 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours, 8 hours, and 24 hours.
Time frame: At week 4
Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from plasma concentration-time profiles using noncompartmental methods (WinNonlin version 4.01, Pharsight Corp., Mountain View, CA). AUC24h (area under the curve from 0 to 24 hours) were determined using the linear-log trapezoidal rule.
Time frame: At week 4
Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from plasma concentration-time profiles using noncompartmental methods (WinNonlin version 4.01, Pharsight Corp., Mountain View, CA).
Time frame: At week 4
Estimated based on concentrations from intensive PK sampling times at pre-dose, 1 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours, 8 hours, and 24 hours.
Time frame: At week 4
Estimated based on concentrations from intensive PK sampling times at pre-dose, 1 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours, 8 hours, and 24 hours.
Time frame: At week 4
Estimated based on concentrations from intensive PK sampling times at pre-dose, 1 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours, 8 hours, and 24 hours.
Time frame: At week 4
Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from plasma concentration-time profiles using noncompartmental methods (WinNonlin version 4.01, Pharsight Corp., Mountain View, CA). AUC24h (area under the curve from 0 to 24 hours) were determined using the linear-log trapezoidal rule.
Time frame: At week 4
Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from plasma concentration-time profiles using noncompartmental methods (WinNonlin version 4.01, Pharsight Corp., Mountain View, CA).
Time frame: At week 4
Estimated based on concentrations from intensive PK sampling times at pre-dose, 1 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours, 8 hours, and 24 hours.
Time frame: At week 4
Estimated based on concentrations from intensive PK sampling times at pre-dose, 1 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours, 8 hours, and 24 hours.
Time frame: At week 4
Estimated based on concentrations from intensive PK sampling times at pre-dose, 1 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours, 8 hours, and 24 hours.
Time frame: At week 4
Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from plasma concentration-time profiles using noncompartmental methods (WinNonlin version 4.01, Pharsight Corp., Mountain View, CA). AUC24h (area under the curve from 0 to 24 hours) were determined using the linear-log trapezoidal rule.
Time frame: At week 4
Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from plasma concentration-time profiles using noncompartmental methods (WinNonlin version 4.01, Pharsight Corp., Mountain View, CA).
Time frame: Up to 26 weeks
At each visit, the site reported the number of directly observed therapy (DOT) doses since the last visit. The number of expected DOT doses was 182. The number of expected DOT doses was adjusted by removing the number of days during temporary holds due to adverse events. This avoided penalizing participants who missed DOT doses due to protocol-required treatment holds for adverse events. Participants who missed DOT doses for other reasons were penalized even if they made up the missed doses by the week 30 study visit as allowed by the protocol. The proportion of expected 182 DOT doses was calculated as the total number of DOT doses reported by the site divided by the adjusted number of expected DOT doses.
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Nih
A Phase II, Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety/Tolerability of Two Linezolid Dosing Strategies in Combination With a Short Course Regimen for the Treatment of Drug-Resistant Pulmonary Tuberculosis
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02715271
Actinomycetales Infections, Bacterial Infections
Tbilisi, Georgia
View Trial DetailsNCT04179500
Actinomycetales Infections, Bacterial Infections
Tbilisi, Georgia
View Trial DetailsNCT03338621
Actinomycetales Infections, Bacterial Infections
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
View Trial DetailsNCT03086486
Actinomycetales Infections, Bacterial Infections
Tbilisi, Georgia
View Trial Details