Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT07664384

General Versus Spinal Anesthesia in RIRS

The impact of anesthesia type on Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) outcomes remains a subject of ongoing debate. Several studies have compared general anesthesia (GA) and spinal anesthesia (SA) in endourological procedures, with conflicting results regarding operative time, complication rates, and stone-free outcomes. Importantly, the interaction between anesthesia type and stone characteristics-particularly stone size-has not been fully elucidated. Therefore, this study aims to conduct a retrospective comparative analysis of general versus spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing RIRS at Qena University Hospital, with particular emphasis on the effect of stone size stratification on perioperative outcomes.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Qena University

Qina, Qena Governorate, 83511, Egypt

About this study

Urolithiasis is a common urological condition with a rising global incidence and prevalence, largely attributed to lifestyle, dietary factors, and metabolic disorders. The lifetime risk of developing urinary stones is estimated to be approximately 10-15%, with a high recurrence rate that imposes a significant burden on healthcare systems. Advances in minimally invasive techniques have revolutionized the management of renal calculi, with retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) emerging as a safe and effective modality for treating renal stones of varying sizes and locations.

RIRS, performed using flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy, has gained widespread acceptance due to its minimally invasive nature, reduced morbidity, and favorable stone-free rates. It is particularly advantageous for managing stones less than 2 cm, although its indications have expanded to include larger and more complex stones in selected cases. Despite these advantages, several factors influence the success and safety of RIRS, including stone size, location, density, surgeon experience, and perioperative management strategies.

Among perioperative factors, the choice of anesthesia plays a critical role in determining surgical conditions and patient outcomes. General anesthesia (GA) is traditionally preferred for RIRS as it provides optimal airway control, complete immobility, and controlled ventilation, thereby facilitating precise endoscopic manipulation. In contrast, spinal anesthesia (SA) has been proposed as an alternative due to its advantages such as reduced postoperative pain, lower incidence of nausea and vomiting, and avoidance of airway-related complications. However, concerns remain regarding its limitations, including patient movement, inadequate control of respiration, and hemodynamic instability.

By evaluating stone-free rates and perioperative complications across different stone size categories, this study seeks to provide evidence-based guidance for optimizing anesthesia selection in RIRS.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients (≥18 years) scheduled for elective RIRS for renal stones <2 cm.
  • Written informed consent obtained.

Exclusion criteria

  • History of previous ureteral surgery or known ureteral stricture.
  • Multiple or bilateral renal stones requiring staged procedures.

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Stone Free Rate

    Time frame: after the first postoperative month.

    Follow-up Ultrasound/Computed Tomography (US/CT) to assess stone-free status after the first postoperative month. Success was considered as residues of <2mm or absence of any stone fragments.

  2. Total opioid consumption

    Time frame: Perioperative

    Total opioid consumption in the whole postoperative period is recorded

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain assessement

    Time frame: at 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours

    pain is assessed uing Numerical Rating Scale where patients are asked to select a number from 0 to 10 to quantify their pain level where 0= no pain at all and 10= worst pain imaginable

  2. Patient Satisfaction

    Time frame: Perioperative

    patients are asked to evaluate their satisfaction using a simple 4 point likert scale, where 4= Very Satisfied, 3= Satisfied, 2= Dissatisfied, 1= Very Dissatisfied

  3. PACU stay

    Time frame: Perioperative

    the duration of stay in PACU (postanesthetic care unit) is recorded

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

South Valley University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparative Study of General Versus Spinal Anesthesia in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: Impact of Stone Size on Perioperative Outcomes

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Jun 24, 2026
Registry last updated
Jul 21, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.