Qena University
Qina, Qena Governorate, 83511, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT07664384
The impact of anesthesia type on Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) outcomes remains a subject of ongoing debate. Several studies have compared general anesthesia (GA) and spinal anesthesia (SA) in endourological procedures, with conflicting results regarding operative time, complication rates, and stone-free outcomes. Importantly, the interaction between anesthesia type and stone characteristics-particularly stone size-has not been fully elucidated. Therefore, this study aims to conduct a retrospective comparative analysis of general versus spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing RIRS at Qena University Hospital, with particular emphasis on the effect of stone size stratification on perioperative outcomes.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Qina, Qena Governorate, 83511, Egypt
Urolithiasis is a common urological condition with a rising global incidence and prevalence, largely attributed to lifestyle, dietary factors, and metabolic disorders. The lifetime risk of developing urinary stones is estimated to be approximately 10-15%, with a high recurrence rate that imposes a significant burden on healthcare systems. Advances in minimally invasive techniques have revolutionized the management of renal calculi, with retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) emerging as a safe and effective modality for treating renal stones of varying sizes and locations.
RIRS, performed using flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy, has gained widespread acceptance due to its minimally invasive nature, reduced morbidity, and favorable stone-free rates. It is particularly advantageous for managing stones less than 2 cm, although its indications have expanded to include larger and more complex stones in selected cases. Despite these advantages, several factors influence the success and safety of RIRS, including stone size, location, density, surgeon experience, and perioperative management strategies.
Among perioperative factors, the choice of anesthesia plays a critical role in determining surgical conditions and patient outcomes. General anesthesia (GA) is traditionally preferred for RIRS as it provides optimal airway control, complete immobility, and controlled ventilation, thereby facilitating precise endoscopic manipulation. In contrast, spinal anesthesia (SA) has been proposed as an alternative due to its advantages such as reduced postoperative pain, lower incidence of nausea and vomiting, and avoidance of airway-related complications. However, concerns remain regarding its limitations, including patient movement, inadequate control of respiration, and hemodynamic instability.
By evaluating stone-free rates and perioperative complications across different stone size categories, this study seeks to provide evidence-based guidance for optimizing anesthesia selection in RIRS.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: after the first postoperative month.
Follow-up Ultrasound/Computed Tomography (US/CT) to assess stone-free status after the first postoperative month. Success was considered as residues of <2mm or absence of any stone fragments.
Time frame: Perioperative
Total opioid consumption in the whole postoperative period is recorded
Time frame: at 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours
pain is assessed uing Numerical Rating Scale where patients are asked to select a number from 0 to 10 to quantify their pain level where 0= no pain at all and 10= worst pain imaginable
Time frame: Perioperative
patients are asked to evaluate their satisfaction using a simple 4 point likert scale, where 4= Very Satisfied, 3= Satisfied, 2= Dissatisfied, 1= Very Dissatisfied
Time frame: Perioperative
the duration of stay in PACU (postanesthetic care unit) is recorded
South Valley University
Other
Comparative Study of General Versus Spinal Anesthesia in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: Impact of Stone Size on Perioperative Outcomes
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04856722
Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy, Female Urogenital Diseases
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT05269108
Calculi, Female Urogenital Diseases
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT06812884
Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery
Mersin, Turkey, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07202923
Female Urogenital Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Saint Petersburg, Outside U.S./Canada, Russia
View Trial Details