St. Luke's Clinical Hospital
Saint Petersburg, Outside U.S./Canada, Russia
NCT Number: NCT07202923
The aim of the study is to evaluate the effect of preoperative taking alpha-blockers (tamsulosin or silodosin) on the success rate of ureteral access sheath (UAS) insertion and the degree of ureteral injury during RIRS in non-prestented patients.
The results showed that patients who received alpha-blockers had a higher rate of successful UAS insertion and a lower degree of ureteral injury compared to non-prestented patients. In addition, patients with a BMI greater than 25 kg/m² and those older than 59 years demonstrated a higher success rate of UAS insertion and lower degree of ureteral injury.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Saint Petersburg, Outside U.S./Canada, Russia
Study Title:
Effect of Preoperative Tamsulosin and Silodosin on Successful Insertion Ureteral Access Sheath and Reduce Ureteral Injury in Non-Prestented Patients During Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS). Assessment of factors for successful ureteral access sheath insertion. Randomized clinical trial.
Study Design:
Prospective, randomized, open-label, controlled trial with four parallel arms. Conducted from July 2021 to June 2024.
Study Center:
Department of Urology, St. Luke's Clinical Hospital, St. Petersburg, Russia
Study Population:
140 patients, divided into four equal groups of 35 people each: Group I (Tamsulosin): Non-prestented patients receiving 0.4 mg of Tamsulosin daily for 7 days before RIRS.
Group II (Silodosin): Non-prestented patients receiving 8 mg of Silodosin daily for 7 days before RIRS.
Group III: Prestented patients. Group IV: Control group (non-prestented patients)
Interventions:
All patients received antibiotic prophylaxis with third-generation cephalosporins 30 minutes before surgery.
RIRS was performed using disposable flexible ureteroscopes. The UAS diameter was 11/13 Fr. Thulium fiber laser was used for lithotripsy. Stone fragmentation was performed in dusting and fragmentation modes, with a total power not exceeding 20 W and a fiber thickness of 200 µm.
Statistical Analysis:
Data were analyzed using Shapiro-Wilk, Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis, and chi-square tests with Bonferroni correction (SPSS v26, JMP Pro 17). Statistical significance was set at p<0.05.
Key Findings:
Comparable baseline characteristics (p>0.05)
Significantly higher UAS success rates:
Tamsulosin: 31 (88.57%)
Silodosin: 32 (91.43%)
Prestented: 33 (94.29%)
Control: 62.86% (p=0.0008)
Preoperative taking Silodosin significantly reduced degree ureteral injury (p=0.0253).
Patients receiving alpha-blockers experienced less postoperative pain compared to the control group (p<0.0001) and less inflammatory changes in blood tests compared to prestented patients (WBC: p=0.0002; CRP: p<0.0001)
Patients with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m² and age ≥ 59 years had a higher success rate of UAS insertion (p<0,0001).
Patients with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m² and age ≥ 59 years have a lower degree of ureteral injury (p<0,0001).
Conclusions:
Preoperative taking of alpha-blockers (Tamsulosin or Silodosin) increases the success of UAS insertion.
Silodosin reduces the degree ureteral injury. Patients taking alpha-blockers less postoperative pain and inflammatory changes in blood tests.
A BMI ≥ 25 kg/m² and age ≥ 59 years increase the success of UAS insertion and reduce degree of ureteral injury
Clinical Implications:
This study provides evidence supporting the use of alpha-blockers, particularly silodosin, for passive ureteral dilation prior to RIRS in non-prestented patients, potentially reducing compications and improving patient outcomes.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: Intraoperative
Proportion of patients with successful UAS insertion
Time frame: Perioperative
Assessed using the PULS scale.Post-Ureteral Lesion Scale. Grade 0: No injury - intact ureter with no visible damage. Grade 1: Superficial mucosal injury - minor abrasions or erosions without disruption of the ureteral wall.
Grade 2: Partial thickness injury - damage involving part of the ureteral wall, without full-thickness perforation; may have localized bleeding.
Grade 3: Full-thickness ureteral injury - perforation of the ureteral wall with urine leakage, but the injury is limited in size.
Grade 4: Extensive ureteral damage - large perforation with significant tissue destruction.
Grade 5: Complete transection or avulsion - full disruption with loss of ureteral tissue, typically requiring complex reconstructive surgery.
Time frame: 6, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively
Patient-reported pain intensity. The Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VASP) is a widely used, validated tool for the subjective measurement of pain intensity. It consists of a straight line, typically 10 centimeters (100 millimeters) in length, anchored by two verbal descriptors: "no pain" at the zero end and "worst imaginable pain" at the opposite end.
Participants rate their current pain level by marking a point along the line that corresponds to their perception of pain intensity. The distance from the zero point to the mark (measured in millimeters or centimeters) quantifies the pain intensity on a continuous scale from 0 to 10 (or 0 to 100).
Time frame: Baseline and 24 hours postoperatively
Change in in blood Leukocyte count, 10⁹/L C- reactive protein , mg/l
Time frame: Until the completion of the study, on average 1 year
Multivariate analysis of factors influencing successful UAS insetion. BMI of the patient - kg/m² Age of the patient
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Complications graded by Clavien-Dindo classification
Time frame: Intraoperative (measured from start to end of procedure)
total operative time
St. Luke's Clinical Hospital, Russia
Other
Effect of Preoperative Tamsulosin and Silodosin on Successful Insertion Ureteral Access Sheath and Reduce Ureteral Injury in Non-Prestented Patients During Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS). Assessment of Factors for Successful Ureteral Access Sheath Insertion. Randomized Clinical Trial.
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04695951
Calculi, Female Urogenital Diseases
Managua, Nicaragua
View Trial DetailsNCT02214836
Calculi, Female Urogenital Diseases
Seattle, Washington, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07445646
Calculi, Female Urogenital Diseases
Zagazig, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07555535
Airway Management, Female Urogenital Diseases
Yenimahalle, Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details