King Edward Medical University/Mayo Hospital
Lahore, Punjab Province, 54000, Pakistan
NCT Number: NCT05750875
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the efficacy of gabapentin with loratadine in reducing the severity of uremic pruritus in patients of chronic kidney disease and to compare the side effects of both drugs. The main questions it aims to answer are:
* Which drug (gabapentin versus loratadine) is more effective in reducing the severity of uremic pruritus? * Which drug (gabapentin versus loratadine) has fewer side effects?
Participants were divided into two groups.Group A received loratadine 10mg daily and group B received gabapentin 100mg daily. Both groups were given treatment for 4 weeks.
* Participants were asked to grade the severity of pruritus on a numerical rating scale and also answer the Dermatology Life Quality Index Questionnaire (DLQI) * Participants were also asked to report any side effects, if occurred.
Researchers compared both groups with regards to improvement in pruritus severity, DLQI score and side effects.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–70 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Lahore, Punjab Province, 54000, Pakistan
Informed written consent was taken from all the participants. Participants were asked to discontinue any topical or systemic antipruritic drugs, for least 1 week prior to the study. Demographic, clinical and laboratory data (complete blood count, renal function tests, liver function tests, serum electrolytes and ultrasound abdomen) was evaluated at baseline. Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) and stage of chronic kidney disease was calculated. Participants were randomly allocated to two groups. One group received loratadine 10mg daily and the other received gabapentin 100mg daily. Those participants undergoing hemodialysis received their respective dose after the dialysis session. Both groups were given treatment for 4 weeks. Participants were asked to grade the severity of pruritus on a numerical rating scale and also answer the Dermatology Life Quality Index Questionnaire.These proformas were filled once at the start of the study, at 2 weeks and then at the end of study i.e. 4 weeks. Participants were also asked to report any adverse events, if occurred.
The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25.0 was used to analyze the data. Qualitative data (like gender, dialysis status, etc.) was expressed in the form of frequency and percentages while quantitative data (like age, weight, serum creatinine levels, etc.) was represented as mean and standard deviations (Mean±SD). The reduction in scores of numerical rating scale and Dermatology Life Quality Index Questionnaire was calculated from baseline. Mean reduction in scores were compared between the two groups and independent sample t-test was applied. p-value <0.05 was considered as significant.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants were given loratadine 10mg, oral, daily, for 4 weeks
Participants were given gabapentin 100mg, oral, daily, for 4 weeks
Time frame: Four weeks
Reduction in pruritus score as measured on a numerical rating scale, numbered between '0' (corresponding to no itch) and '10' (the worst imaginable itch).
Time frame: Four weeks
Dermatology Life Quality Index Questionnaire score ranging from from 0 (no impairment of life quality) to 30 (maximum impairment).
Time frame: Four weeks
King Edward Medical University
Other
Comparison of the Efficacy of Gabapentin With Loratadine in the Treatment of Uremic Pruritus in Patients of Chronic Kidney Disease
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03617536
Chronic Disease, Chronic Kidney Diseases
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00442819
Female Urogenital Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Taichung, Taiwan
View Trial DetailsNCT06593392
Chronic Disease, Chronic Kidney Diseases
Chengdu, China
View Trial DetailsNCT04289038
Chronic Disease, Chronic Renal Insufficiency
Ankara, Eyalet/Yerleşke, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details